Matthias Krüger
3b6593a0b4
Rollup merge of #107103 - compiler-errors:new-solver-evaluate_obligation, r=lcnr ...
Use new solver in `evaluate_obligation` query (when new solver is enabled)
(only when `-Ztrait-solver=next`, of course)
... Does this make sense? It seems to me like it should be reasonable, but maybe there's some reason why this is a bad idea.
r? ``@lcnr``
Needs a perf run because I guess this `solver == TraitSolver::Next` check is on a hot path.
2023-01-28 05:20:16 +01:00
2023-01-22 23:41:39 -05:00
2023-01-28 00:23:12 +09:00
2023-01-27 11:43:38 +01:00
2023-01-19 13:52:15 +01:00
2023-01-27 08:53:39 +01:00
2023-01-26 20:28:31 -07:00
2023-01-27 08:53:39 +01:00
2023-01-27 15:02:44 +00:00
2023-01-25 01:46:19 -05:00
2023-01-27 17:49:56 +00:00
2023-01-27 18:58:44 +00:00
2023-01-27 18:59:32 +00:00
2023-01-26 15:02:21 +01:00
2023-01-23 10:35:21 +00:00
2023-01-27 10:59:51 +01:00
2023-01-26 15:02:20 +01:00
2023-01-20 04:52:28 +00:00
2023-01-25 17:01:41 +05:30
2023-01-27 18:56:32 +00:00
2023-01-28 05:20:16 +01:00
2023-01-28 05:20:16 +01:00
2023-01-19 15:25:33 +00:00
2023-01-27 22:01:25 +00:00
2023-01-27 20:10:06 +00:00
2023-01-27 18:58:44 +00:00
2023-01-22 06:53:36 +00:00
2023-01-21 23:20:58 -05:00
2023-01-17 23:17:51 -08:00
2023-01-27 19:00:26 +00:00
2023-01-27 22:01:12 +00:00
2023-01-27 22:01:12 +00:00
2023-01-27 22:01:12 +00:00
2023-01-26 20:28:31 -07:00
2023-01-26 06:15:24 +01:00
2023-01-27 08:53:39 +01:00
2023-01-26 20:33:27 -07:00
2023-01-27 18:58:44 +00:00
2023-01-25 08:58:27 -05:00
2023-01-27 18:57:34 +00:00
2023-01-26 12:44:47 +00:00
2023-01-27 18:58:44 +00:00
2023-01-26 06:15:27 +01:00
2023-01-28 05:20:16 +01:00
2023-01-27 18:58:44 +00:00
2023-01-18 10:22:21 -08:00
2023-01-27 22:01:25 +00:00
2023-01-27 19:00:26 +00:00
3b6593a0b4