3a79af7e27
10491: Support nested type on replace if let with match r=k-nasa a=k-nasa ## Why close: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8690 Now, Replacing if-let with match cant't output exhaustive patterns code. This was because the `else` conversion used specific types (ex. Option, Result) instead of wildcards. I thought it was more of a problem to generate non-exhaustive patterns than the benefits of using the concrete one. How about using wildcards in `else`? Is this change policy acceptable? ## What - using wildcards on `make_else_arm` - Change test cases Co-authored-by: k-nasa <htilcs1115@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
base_db | ||
cfg | ||
flycheck | ||
hir | ||
hir_def | ||
hir_expand | ||
hir_ty | ||
ide | ||
ide_assists | ||
ide_completion | ||
ide_db | ||
ide_diagnostics | ||
ide_ssr | ||
limit | ||
mbe | ||
parser | ||
paths | ||
proc_macro_api | ||
proc_macro_srv | ||
proc_macro_test | ||
profile | ||
project_model | ||
rust-analyzer | ||
sourcegen | ||
stdx | ||
syntax | ||
test_utils | ||
text_edit | ||
toolchain | ||
tt | ||
vfs | ||
vfs-notify |