1a1cd6e6db
This commit restricts what symbols can be used in a format string for
any option of the `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` attribute. We
previously allowed all the ad-hoc options supported by the internal
`#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` attribute. For the stable attribute we only
want to support generic parameter names and `{Self}` as parameters. For
any other parameter an warning is emitted and the parameter is replaced
by the literal parameter string, so for example `{integer}` turns into
`{integer}`. This follows the general design of attributes in the
`#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace, that any syntax "error" is treated
as warning and subsequently ignored.
61 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
61 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
trait_selection_adjust_signature_borrow = consider adjusting the signature so it borrows its {$len ->
|
|
[one] argument
|
|
*[other] arguments
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_adjust_signature_remove_borrow = consider adjusting the signature so it does not borrow its {$len ->
|
|
[one] argument
|
|
*[other] arguments
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_closure_fn_mut_label = closure is `FnMut` because it mutates the variable `{$place}` here
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_closure_fn_once_label = closure is `FnOnce` because it moves the variable `{$place}` out of its environment
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_closure_kind_mismatch = expected a closure that implements the `{$expected}` trait, but this closure only implements `{$found}`
|
|
.label = this closure implements `{$found}`, not `{$expected}`
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_closure_kind_requirement = the requirement to implement `{$expected}` derives from here
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_dump_vtable_entries = vtable entries for `{$trait_ref}`: {$entries}
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_empty_on_clause_in_rustc_on_unimplemented = empty `on`-clause in `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`
|
|
.label = empty on-clause here
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_ignored_diagnostic_option = `{$option_name}` is ignored due to previous definition of `{$option_name}`
|
|
.other_label = `{$option_name}` is first declared here
|
|
.label = `{$option_name}` is already declared here
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_inherent_projection_normalization_overflow = overflow evaluating associated type `{$ty}`
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_invalid_on_clause_in_rustc_on_unimplemented = invalid `on`-clause in `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`
|
|
.label = invalid on-clause here
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_malformed_on_unimplemented_attr = malformed `on_unimplemented` attribute
|
|
.help = only `message`, `note` and `label` are allowed as options
|
|
.label = invalid option found here
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_missing_options_for_on_unimplemented_attr = missing options for `on_unimplemented` attribute
|
|
.help = at least one of the `message`, `note` and `label` options are expected
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_negative_positive_conflict = found both positive and negative implementation of trait `{$trait_desc}`{$self_desc ->
|
|
[none] {""}
|
|
*[default] {" "}for type `{$self_desc}`
|
|
}:
|
|
.negative_implementation_here = negative implementation here
|
|
.negative_implementation_in_crate = negative implementation in crate `{$negative_impl_cname}`
|
|
.positive_implementation_here = positive implementation here
|
|
.positive_implementation_in_crate = positive implementation in crate `{$positive_impl_cname}`
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_no_value_in_rustc_on_unimplemented = this attribute must have a valid value
|
|
.label = expected value here
|
|
.note = eg `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(message="foo")]`
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_trait_has_no_impls = this trait has no implementations, consider adding one
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_ty_alias_overflow = in case this is a recursive type alias, consider using a struct, enum, or union instead
|
|
trait_selection_unable_to_construct_constant_value = unable to construct a constant value for the unevaluated constant {$unevaluated}
|
|
|
|
trait_selection_unknown_format_parameter_for_on_unimplemented_attr = there is no parameter `{$argument_name}` on trait `{$trait_name}`
|
|
.help = expect either a generic argument name or {"`{Self}`"} as format argument
|