ed61c139c2
feed resolver_for_lowering instead of storing it in a field r? `@cjgillot` opening this as * a discussion for `no_hash` + `feedable` queries. I think we'll want those, but I don't quite understand why they are rejected beyond a double check of the stable hashes for situations where the query is fed but also read from incremental caches. * and a discussion on removing all untracked fields from TyCtxt and setting it up so that they are fed queries instead
For more information about how rustc works, see the rustc dev guide.