93f595fb2b
This is the second time I'm doing this... I'm starting to feel like stage1 ui-fulldeps tests were a mistake. Maybe I should have just put `#[cfg(bootstrap)]` there to let the bootstrap bumper fix it.
31 lines
1.6 KiB
Rust
31 lines
1.6 KiB
Rust
//@ compile-flags: -Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=yes
|
|
extern crate rustc_data_structures;
|
|
//~^ use of unstable library feature 'rustc_private'
|
|
//~| NOTE: issue #27812 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27812> for more information
|
|
//~| NOTE: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
|
extern crate rustc_macros;
|
|
//~^ use of unstable library feature 'rustc_private'
|
|
//~| NOTE: see issue #27812 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27812> for more information
|
|
//~| NOTE: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
|
extern crate rustc_query_system;
|
|
//~^ use of unstable library feature 'rustc_private'
|
|
//~| NOTE: see issue #27812 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27812> for more information
|
|
//~| NOTE: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
|
|
|
use rustc_macros::HashStable;
|
|
//~^ use of unstable library feature 'rustc_private'
|
|
//~| NOTE: see issue #27812 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27812> for more information
|
|
//~| NOTE: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
|
|
|
#[derive(HashStable)]
|
|
//~^ use of unstable library feature 'rustc_private'
|
|
//~| NOTE: in this expansion of #[derive(HashStable)]
|
|
//~| NOTE: in this expansion of #[derive(HashStable)]
|
|
//~| NOTE: in this expansion of #[derive(HashStable)]
|
|
//~| NOTE: in this expansion of #[derive(HashStable)]
|
|
//~| NOTE: see issue #27812 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27812> for more information
|
|
//~| NOTE: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
|
|
struct Test;
|
|
|
|
fn main() {}
|