14e72e7ffa
Previous Stacked Borrows diagnostics were missing a lot of information about the state of the interpreter, and it was difficult to add additional state because it was threaded through all the intervening function signatures. This change factors a lot of the arguments which used to be passed individually to many stacked borrows functions into a single `DiagnosticCx`, which is built in `Stacks::for_each`, and since it wraps a handle to `AllocHistory`, we can now handle more nuanced things like heterogeneous borrow of `!Freeze` types.
29 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
29 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <TAG> for SharedReadOnly permission at ALLOC[0x4], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location
|
|
--> RUSTLIB/core/src/slice/mod.rs:LL:CC
|
|
|
|
|
LL | unsafe { &*index.get_unchecked(self) }
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
| |
|
|
| trying to retag from <TAG> for SharedReadOnly permission at ALLOC[0x4], but that tag does not exist in the borrow stack for this location
|
|
| this error occurs as part of retag at ALLOC[0x4..0x8]
|
|
|
|
|
= help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
|
|
= help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
|
|
help: <TAG> would have been created here, but this is a zero-size retag ([0x0..0x0]) so the tag in question does not exist anywhere
|
|
--> $DIR/zst_slice.rs:LL:CC
|
|
|
|
|
LL | assert_eq!(*s.get_unchecked(1), 2);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
= note: backtrace:
|
|
= note: inside `core::slice::<impl [i32]>::get_unchecked::<usize>` at RUSTLIB/core/src/slice/mod.rs:LL:CC
|
|
note: inside `main` at $DIR/zst_slice.rs:LL:CC
|
|
--> $DIR/zst_slice.rs:LL:CC
|
|
|
|
|
LL | assert_eq!(*s.get_unchecked(1), 2);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to previous error
|
|
|