rust/tests/ui/borrowck/issue-64453.stderr
Ralf Jung a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00

26 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

error[E0015]: cannot call non-const fn `format` in statics
--> $DIR/issue-64453.rs:4:31
|
LL | static settings_dir: String = format!("");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: calls in statics are limited to constant functions, tuple structs and tuple variants
= note: consider wrapping this expression in `std::sync::LazyLock::new(|| ...)`
= note: this error originates in the macro `format` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error[E0507]: cannot move out of static item `settings_dir`
--> $DIR/issue-64453.rs:13:37
|
LL | let settings_data = from_string(settings_dir);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ move occurs because `settings_dir` has type `String`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | let settings_data = from_string(settings_dir.clone());
| ++++++++
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0015, E0507.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0015`.