//! Provider for the `implied_outlives_bounds` query. //! Do not call this query directory. See [`rustc::traits::query::implied_outlives_bounds`]. use rustc::hir; use rustc::infer::InferCtxt; use rustc::infer::canonical::{self, Canonical}; use rustc::traits::{TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt}; use rustc::traits::query::outlives_bounds::OutlivesBound; use rustc::traits::query::{CanonicalTyGoal, Fallible, NoSolution}; use rustc::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable}; use rustc::ty::outlives::Component; use rustc::ty::query::Providers; use rustc::ty::wf; use smallvec::{SmallVec, smallvec}; use syntax::source_map::DUMMY_SP; use rustc::traits::FulfillmentContext; crate fn provide(p: &mut Providers<'_>) { *p = Providers { implied_outlives_bounds, ..*p }; } fn implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>( tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, goal: CanonicalTyGoal<'tcx>, ) -> Result< &'tcx Canonical<'tcx, canonical::QueryResponse<'tcx, Vec>>>, NoSolution, > { tcx.infer_ctxt() .enter_canonical_trait_query(&goal, |infcx, _fulfill_cx, key| { let (param_env, ty) = key.into_parts(); compute_implied_outlives_bounds(&infcx, param_env, ty) }) } fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>( infcx: &InferCtxt<'_, 'tcx>, param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, ty: Ty<'tcx>, ) -> Fallible>> { let tcx = infcx.tcx; // Sometimes when we ask what it takes for T: WF, we get back that // U: WF is required; in that case, we push U onto this stack and // process it next. Currently (at least) these resulting // predicates are always guaranteed to be a subset of the original // type, so we need not fear non-termination. let mut wf_types = vec![ty]; let mut implied_bounds = vec![]; let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new(); while let Some(ty) = wf_types.pop() { // Compute the obligations for `ty` to be well-formed. If `ty` is // an unresolved inference variable, just substituted an empty set // -- because the return type here is going to be things we *add* // to the environment, it's always ok for this set to be smaller // than the ultimate set. (Note: normally there won't be // unresolved inference variables here anyway, but there might be // during typeck under some circumstances.) let obligations = wf::obligations(infcx, param_env, hir::DUMMY_HIR_ID, ty, DUMMY_SP).unwrap_or(vec![]); // N.B., all of these predicates *ought* to be easily proven // true. In fact, their correctness is (mostly) implied by // other parts of the program. However, in #42552, we had // an annoying scenario where: // // - Some `T::Foo` gets normalized, resulting in a // variable `_1` and a `T: Trait` constraint // (not sure why it couldn't immediately get // solved). This result of `_1` got cached. // - These obligations were dropped on the floor here, // rather than being registered. // - Then later we would get a request to normalize // `T::Foo` which would result in `_1` being used from // the cache, but hence without the `T: Trait` // constraint. As a result, `_1` never gets resolved, // and we get an ICE (in dropck). // // Therefore, we register any predicates involving // inference variables. We restrict ourselves to those // involving inference variables both for efficiency and // to avoids duplicate errors that otherwise show up. fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations( infcx, obligations .iter() .filter(|o| o.predicate.has_infer_types()) .cloned(), ); // From the full set of obligations, just filter down to the // region relationships. implied_bounds.extend(obligations.into_iter().flat_map(|obligation| { assert!(!obligation.has_escaping_bound_vars()); match obligation.predicate { ty::Predicate::Trait(..) | ty::Predicate::Subtype(..) | ty::Predicate::Projection(..) | ty::Predicate::ClosureKind(..) | ty::Predicate::ObjectSafe(..) | ty::Predicate::ConstEvaluatable(..) => vec![], ty::Predicate::WellFormed(subty) => { wf_types.push(subty); vec![] } ty::Predicate::RegionOutlives(ref data) => match data.no_bound_vars() { None => vec![], Some(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r_a, r_b)) => { vec![OutlivesBound::RegionSubRegion(r_b, r_a)] } }, ty::Predicate::TypeOutlives(ref data) => match data.no_bound_vars() { None => vec![], Some(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty_a, r_b)) => { let ty_a = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(&ty_a); let mut components = smallvec![]; tcx.push_outlives_components(ty_a, &mut components); implied_bounds_from_components(r_b, components) } }, } })); } // Ensure that those obligations that we had to solve // get solved *here*. match fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx) { Ok(()) => Ok(implied_bounds), Err(_) => Err(NoSolution), } } /// When we have an implied bound that `T: 'a`, we can further break /// this down to determine what relationships would have to hold for /// `T: 'a` to hold. We get to assume that the caller has validated /// those relationships. fn implied_bounds_from_components( sub_region: ty::Region<'tcx>, sup_components: SmallVec<[Component<'tcx>; 4]>, ) -> Vec> { sup_components .into_iter() .filter_map(|component| { match component { Component::Region(r) => Some(OutlivesBound::RegionSubRegion(sub_region, r)), Component::Param(p) => Some(OutlivesBound::RegionSubParam(sub_region, p)), Component::Projection(p) => Some(OutlivesBound::RegionSubProjection(sub_region, p)), Component::EscapingProjection(_) => // If the projection has escaping regions, don't // try to infer any implied bounds even for its // free components. This is conservative, because // the caller will still have to prove that those // free components outlive `sub_region`. But the // idea is that the WAY that the caller proves // that may change in the future and we want to // give ourselves room to get smarter here. None, Component::UnresolvedInferenceVariable(..) => None, } }) .collect() }