use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_sugg; use clippy_utils::source::snippet_with_applicability; use clippy_utils::ty::is_type_lang_item; use if_chain::if_chain; use rustc_errors::Applicability; use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind, LangItem}; use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext}; use rustc_middle::{lint::in_external_macro, ty::TyS}; use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint}; declare_clippy_lint! { /// **What it does:** Checks for redundant slicing expressions which use the full range, and /// do not change the type. /// /// **Why is this bad?** It unnecessarily adds complexity to the expression. /// /// **Known problems:** If the type being sliced has an implementation of `Index` /// that actually changes anything then it can't be removed. However, this would be surprising /// to people reading the code and should have a note with it. /// /// **Example:** /// /// ```ignore /// fn get_slice(x: &[u32]) -> &[u32] { /// &x[..] /// } /// ``` /// Use instead: /// ```ignore /// fn get_slice(x: &[u32]) -> &[u32] { /// x /// } /// ``` pub REDUNDANT_SLICING, complexity, "redundant slicing of the whole range of a type" } declare_lint_pass!(RedundantSlicing => [REDUNDANT_SLICING]); impl LateLintPass<'_> for RedundantSlicing { fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) { if in_external_macro(cx.sess(), expr.span) { return; } if_chain! { if let ExprKind::AddrOf(_, _, addressee) = expr.kind; if let ExprKind::Index(indexed, range) = addressee.kind; if is_type_lang_item(cx, cx.typeck_results().expr_ty_adjusted(range), LangItem::RangeFull); if TyS::same_type(cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(expr), cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(indexed)); then { let mut app = Applicability::MachineApplicable; let hint = snippet_with_applicability(cx, indexed.span, "..", &mut app).into_owned(); span_lint_and_sugg( cx, REDUNDANT_SLICING, expr.span, "redundant slicing of the whole range", "use the original slice instead", hint, app, ); } } } }