% The Rust Testing Guide # Quick start To create test functions, add a `#[test]` attribute like this: ~~~test_harness fn return_two() -> int { 2 } #[test] fn return_two_test() { let x = return_two(); assert!(x == 2); } ~~~ To run these tests, compile with `rustc --test` and run the resulting binary: ~~~console $ rustc --test foo.rs $ ./foo running 1 test test return_two_test ... ok test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured ~~~ `rustc foo.rs` will *not* compile the tests, since `#[test]` implies `#[cfg(test)]`. The `--test` flag to `rustc` implies `--cfg test`. # Unit testing in Rust Rust has built in support for simple unit testing. Functions can be marked as unit tests using the `test` attribute. ~~~test_harness #[test] fn return_none_if_empty() { // ... test code ... } ~~~ A test function's signature must have no arguments and no return value. To run the tests in a crate, it must be compiled with the `--test` flag: `rustc myprogram.rs --test -o myprogram-tests`. Running the resulting executable will run all the tests in the crate. A test is considered successful if its function returns; if the task running the test fails, through a call to `fail!`, a failed `assert`, or some other (`assert_eq`, ...) means, then the test fails. When compiling a crate with the `--test` flag `--cfg test` is also implied, so that tests can be conditionally compiled. ~~~test_harness #[cfg(test)] mod tests { #[test] fn return_none_if_empty() { // ... test code ... } } ~~~ Additionally `#[test]` items behave as if they also have the `#[cfg(test)]` attribute, and will not be compiled when the `--test` flag is not used. Tests that should not be run can be annotated with the `ignore` attribute. The existence of these tests will be noted in the test runner output, but the test will not be run. Tests can also be ignored by configuration so, for example, to ignore a test on windows you can write `#[ignore(cfg(target_os = "win32"))]`. Tests that are intended to fail can be annotated with the `should_fail` attribute. The test will be run, and if it causes its task to fail then the test will be counted as successful; otherwise it will be counted as a failure. For example: ~~~test_harness #[test] #[should_fail] fn test_out_of_bounds_failure() { let v: &[int] = []; v[0]; } ~~~ A test runner built with the `--test` flag supports a limited set of arguments to control which tests are run: - the first free argument passed to a test runner is interpreted as a regular expression ([syntax reference](regex/index.html#syntax)) and is used to narrow down the set of tests being run. Note: a plain string is a valid regular expression that matches itself. - the `--ignored` flag tells the test runner to run only tests with the `ignore` attribute. ## Parallelism By default, tests are run in parallel, which can make interpreting failure output difficult. In these cases you can set the `RUST_TEST_TASKS` environment variable to 1 to make the tests run sequentially. ## Examples ### Typical test run ~~~console $ mytests running 30 tests running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok running driver::tests::mytest2 ... ignored ... snip ... running driver::tests::mytest30 ... ok result: ok. 28 passed; 0 failed; 2 ignored ~~~ ### Test run with failures ~~~console $ mytests running 30 tests running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok running driver::tests::mytest2 ... ignored ... snip ... running driver::tests::mytest30 ... FAILED result: FAILED. 27 passed; 1 failed; 2 ignored ~~~ ### Running ignored tests ~~~console $ mytests --ignored running 2 tests running driver::tests::mytest2 ... failed running driver::tests::mytest10 ... ok result: FAILED. 1 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored ~~~ ### Running a subset of tests Using a plain string: ~~~console $ mytests mytest23 running 1 tests running driver::tests::mytest23 ... ok result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored ~~~ Using some regular expression features: ~~~console $ mytests 'mytest[145]' running 13 tests running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok running driver::tests::mytest4 ... ok running driver::tests::mytest5 ... ok running driver::tests::mytest10 ... ignored ... snip ... running driver::tests::mytest19 ... ok result: ok. 13 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored ~~~ # Microbenchmarking The test runner also understands a simple form of benchmark execution. Benchmark functions are marked with the `#[bench]` attribute, rather than `#[test]`, and have a different form and meaning. They are compiled along with `#[test]` functions when a crate is compiled with `--test`, but they are not run by default. To run the benchmark component of your testsuite, pass `--bench` to the compiled test runner. The type signature of a benchmark function differs from a unit test: it takes a mutable reference to type `test::Bencher`. Inside the benchmark function, any time-variable or "setup" code should execute first, followed by a call to `iter` on the benchmark harness, passing a closure that contains the portion of the benchmark you wish to actually measure the per-iteration speed of. For benchmarks relating to processing/generating data, one can set the `bytes` field to the number of bytes consumed/produced in each iteration; this will used to show the throughput of the benchmark. This must be the amount used in each iteration, *not* the total amount. For example: ~~~test_harness extern crate test; use test::Bencher; #[bench] fn bench_sum_1024_ints(b: &mut Bencher) { let v = Vec::from_fn(1024, |n| n); b.iter(|| v.iter().fold(0, |old, new| old + *new)); } #[bench] fn initialise_a_vector(b: &mut Bencher) { b.iter(|| Vec::from_elem(1024, 0u64)); b.bytes = 1024 * 8; } ~~~ The benchmark runner will calibrate measurement of the benchmark function to run the `iter` block "enough" times to get a reliable measure of the per-iteration speed. Advice on writing benchmarks: - Move setup code outside the `iter` loop; only put the part you want to measure inside - Make the code do "the same thing" on each iteration; do not accumulate or change state - Make the outer function idempotent too; the benchmark runner is likely to run it many times - Make the inner `iter` loop short and fast so benchmark runs are fast and the calibrator can adjust the run-length at fine resolution - Make the code in the `iter` loop do something simple, to assist in pinpointing performance improvements (or regressions) To run benchmarks, pass the `--bench` flag to the compiled test-runner. Benchmarks are compiled-in but not executed by default. ~~~console $ rustc mytests.rs -O --test $ mytests --bench running 2 tests test bench_sum_1024_ints ... bench: 709 ns/iter (+/- 82) test initialise_a_vector ... bench: 424 ns/iter (+/- 99) = 19320 MB/s test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 2 measured ~~~ ## Benchmarks and the optimizer Benchmarks compiled with optimizations activated can be dramatically changed by the optimizer so that the benchmark is no longer benchmarking what one expects. For example, the compiler might recognize that some calculation has no external effects and remove it entirely. ~~~test_harness extern crate test; use test::Bencher; #[bench] fn bench_xor_1000_ints(b: &mut Bencher) { b.iter(|| { range(0, 1000).fold(0, |old, new| old ^ new); }); } ~~~ gives the following results ~~~console running 1 test test bench_xor_1000_ints ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0) test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 1 measured ~~~ The benchmarking runner offers two ways to avoid this. Either, the closure that the `iter` method receives can return an arbitrary value which forces the optimizer to consider the result used and ensures it cannot remove the computation entirely. This could be done for the example above by adjusting the `bh.iter` call to ~~~ # struct X; impl X { fn iter(&self, _: || -> T) {} } let b = X; b.iter(|| { // note lack of `;` (could also use an explicit `return`). range(0, 1000).fold(0, |old, new| old ^ new) }); ~~~ Or, the other option is to call the generic `test::black_box` function, which is an opaque "black box" to the optimizer and so forces it to consider any argument as used. ~~~ extern crate test; # fn main() { # struct X; impl X { fn iter(&self, _: || -> T) {} } let b = X; b.iter(|| { test::black_box(range(0, 1000).fold(0, |old, new| old ^ new)); }); # } ~~~ Neither of these read or modify the value, and are very cheap for small values. Larger values can be passed indirectly to reduce overhead (e.g. `black_box(&huge_struct)`). Performing either of the above changes gives the following benchmarking results ~~~console running 1 test test bench_xor_1000_ints ... bench: 375 ns/iter (+/- 148) test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 1 measured ~~~ However, the optimizer can still modify a testcase in an undesirable manner even when using either of the above. Benchmarks can be checked by hand by looking at the output of the compiler using the `--emit=ir` (for LLVM IR), `--emit=asm` (for assembly) or compiling normally and using any method for examining object code. ## Saving and ratcheting metrics When running benchmarks or other tests, the test runner can record per-test "metrics". Each metric is a scalar `f64` value, plus a noise value which represents uncertainty in the measurement. By default, all `#[bench]` benchmarks are recorded as metrics, which can be saved as JSON in an external file for further reporting. In addition, the test runner supports _ratcheting_ against a metrics file. Ratcheting is like saving metrics, except that after each run, if the output file already exists the results of the current run are compared against the contents of the existing file, and any regression _causes the testsuite to fail_. If the comparison passes -- if all metrics stayed the same (within noise) or improved -- then the metrics file is overwritten with the new values. In this way, a metrics file in your workspace can be used to ensure your work does not regress performance. Test runners take 3 options that are relevant to metrics: - `--save-metrics=` will save the metrics from a test run to `file.json` - `--ratchet-metrics=` will ratchet the metrics against the `file.json` - `--ratchet-noise-percent=N` will override the noise measurements in `file.json`, and consider a metric change less than `N%` to be noise. This can be helpful if you are testing in a noisy environment where the benchmark calibration loop cannot acquire a clear enough signal.