// unit-test: DataflowConstProp // EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_BIT_WIDTH #![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics, rustc_attrs)] use std::intrinsics::mir::*; #[derive(Copy, Clone)] enum E { V1(i32), V2(i32) } // EMIT_MIR enum.simple.DataflowConstProp.diff // CHECK-LABEL: fn simple( fn simple() { // CHECK: debug e => [[e:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug x => [[x:_.*]]; // CHECK: [[e]] = const E::V1(0_i32); let e = E::V1(0); // CHECK: switchInt(const 0_isize) -> [0: bb[[target_bb:[0-9]+]], 1: bb1, otherwise: bb2]; // CHECK: bb[[target_bb]]: { // CHECK: [[x]] = const 0_i32; let x = match e { E::V1(x1) => x1, E::V2(x2) => x2 }; } // EMIT_MIR enum.constant.DataflowConstProp.diff // CHECK-LABEL: fn constant( fn constant() { // CHECK: debug e => [[e:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug x => [[x:_.*]]; const C: E = E::V1(0); // CHECK: [[e]] = const _; let e = C; // CHECK: switchInt(const 0_isize) -> [0: bb[[target_bb:[0-9]+]], 1: bb1, otherwise: bb2]; // CHECK: bb[[target_bb]]: { // CHECK: [[x]] = const 0_i32; let x = match e { E::V1(x1) => x1, E::V2(x2) => x2 }; } // EMIT_MIR enum.statics.DataflowConstProp.diff // CHECK-LABEL: fn statics( fn statics() { // CHECK: debug e1 => [[e1:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug x1 => [[x1:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug e2 => [[e2:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug x2 => [[x2:_.*]]; static C: E = E::V1(0); // CHECK: [[e1]] = const E::V1(0_i32); let e1 = C; // CHECK: switchInt(const 0_isize) -> [0: bb[[target_bb1:[0-9]+]], 1: bb1, otherwise: bb2]; // CHECK: bb[[target_bb]]: { // CHECK: [[x1]] = const 0_i32; let x1 = match e1 { E::V1(x11) => x11, E::V2(x12) => x12 }; static RC: &E = &E::V2(4); // CHECK: [[t:_.*]] = const {alloc2: &&E}; // CHECK: [[e2]] = (*[[t]]); let e2 = RC; // CHECK: switchInt(move _{{[0-9]+}}) -> [0: bb{{[0-9]+}}, 1: bb{{[0-9]+}}, otherwise: bb{{[0-9]+}}]; // FIXME: add checks for x2. Currently, their MIRs are not symmetric in the two // switch branches. // One is `_9 = &(*_12) and another is `_9 = _11`. It is different from what we can // get by printing MIR directly. It is better to check if there are any bugs in the // MIR passes around this stage. let x2 = match e2 { E::V1(x21) => x21, E::V2(x22) => x22 }; } #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start(1)] #[rustc_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed] struct NonZeroUsize(usize); // EMIT_MIR enum.mutate_discriminant.DataflowConstProp.diff // CHECK-LABEL: fn mutate_discriminant( #[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "post-cleanup")] fn mutate_discriminant() -> u8 { mir!( let x: Option; { SetDiscriminant(x, 1); // This assignment overwrites the niche in which the discriminant is stored. place!(Field(Field(Variant(x, 1), 0), 0)) = 0_usize; // So we cannot know the value of this discriminant. // CHECK: [[a:_.*]] = discriminant(_{{[0-9]*}}); let a = Discriminant(x); // CHECK: switchInt([[a]]) -> [0: bb{{[0-9]+}}, otherwise: bb{{[0-9]+}}]; match a { 0 => bb1, _ => bad, } } bb1 = { RET = 1; Return() } bad = { RET = 2; Unreachable() } ) } // EMIT_MIR enum.multiple.DataflowConstProp.diff // CHECK-LABEL: fn multiple( fn multiple(x: bool, i: u8) { // CHECK: debug x => [[x:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug e => [[e:_.*]]; // CHECK: debug x2 => [[x2:_.*]]; let e = if x { // CHECK: [[e]] = Option::::Some(move _{{[0-9]+}}); Some(i) } else { // CHECK: [[e]] = Option::::None; None }; // The dataflow state must have: // discriminant(e) => Top // (e as Some).0 => Top // CHECK: [[x2]] = const 0_u8; // CHECK: [[x2]] = _{{[0-9]+}} let x2 = match e { Some(i) => i, None => 0 }; // Therefore, `x2` should be `Top` here, and no replacement shall happen. let y = x2; } fn main() { simple(); constant(); statics(); mutate_discriminant(); multiple(false, 5); }