use rustc::lint::*; use syntax::ast::*; use rustc::middle::ty; use utils::{snippet, span_lint}; #[allow(missing_copy_implementations)] pub struct EtaPass; declare_lint!(pub REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, Warn, "using redundant closures, i.e. `|a| foo(a)` (which can be written as just `foo`)"); impl LintPass for EtaPass { fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray { lint_array!(REDUNDANT_CLOSURE) } fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &Context, expr: &Expr) { match expr.node { ExprCall(_, ref args) | ExprMethodCall(_, _, ref args) => { for arg in args { check_closure(cx, arg) } }, _ => (), } } } fn is_adjusted(cx: &Context, e: &Expr) -> bool { cx.tcx.tables.borrow().adjustments.get(&e.id).is_some() } fn check_closure(cx: &Context, expr: &Expr) { if let ExprClosure(_, ref decl, ref blk) = expr.node { if !blk.stmts.is_empty() { // || {foo(); bar()}; can't be reduced here return; } if let Some(ref ex) = blk.expr { if let ExprCall(ref caller, ref args) = ex.node { if args.len() != decl.inputs.len() { // Not the same number of arguments, there // is no way the closure is the same as the function return; } if args.iter().any(|arg| is_adjusted(cx, arg)) { // Are the arguments type-adjusted? Then we need the closure return; } let fn_ty = cx.tcx.expr_ty(caller); if let ty::TyBareFn(_, fn_ty) = fn_ty.sty { // Is it an unsafe function? They don't implement the closure traits if fn_ty.unsafety == Unsafety::Unsafe { return; } } for (ref a1, ref a2) in decl.inputs.iter().zip(args) { if let PatIdent(_, ident, _) = a1.pat.node { // XXXManishearth Should I be checking the binding mode here? if let ExprPath(None, ref p) = a2.node { if p.segments.len() != 1 { // If it's a proper path, it can't be a local variable return; } if p.segments[0].identifier != ident.node { // The two idents should be the same return } } else { return } } else { return } } span_lint(cx, REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, expr.span, &format!( "redundant closure found. Consider using `{}` in its place", snippet(cx, caller.span, ".."))); } } } }