// Test some cases where or-patterns may ostensibly be allowed but are in fact not. // This is not a semantic test. We only test parsing. #![feature(or_patterns)] //~^ WARN the feature `or_patterns` is incomplete and may cause the compiler to crash fn main() {} // Test the `pat` macro fragment parser: macro_rules! accept_pat { ($p:pat) => {} } accept_pat!(p | q); //~ ERROR no rules expected the token `|` accept_pat!(| p | q); //~ ERROR no rules expected the token `|` // Non-macro tests: enum E { A, B } use E::*; fn no_top_level_or_patterns() { // We do *not* allow or-patterns at the top level of lambdas... let _ = |A | B: E| (); //~ ERROR binary operation `|` cannot be applied to type `E` // -------- This looks like an or-pattern but is in fact `|A| (B: E | ())`. // ...and for now neither do we allow or-patterns at the top level of functions. fn fun1(A | B: E) {} //~ ERROR an or-pattern parameter must be wrapped in parenthesis fn fun2(| A | B: E) {} //~^ ERROR a leading `|` is not allowed in a parameter pattern //~| ERROR an or-pattern parameter must be wrapped in parenthesis } // We also do not allow a leading `|` when not in a top level position: fn no_leading_inner() { struct TS(E); struct NS { f: E } let ( | A | B) = E::A; //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let ( | A | B,) = (E::B,); //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let [ | A | B ] = [E::A]; //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let TS( | A | B ); //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let NS { f: | A | B }; //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let ( || A | B) = E::A; //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let [ || A | B ] = [E::A]; //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let TS( || A | B ); //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let NS { f: || A | B }; //~ ERROR a leading `|` is only allowed in a top-level pattern let recovery_witness: String = 0; //~ ERROR mismatched types }