//! This LintPass catches both string addition and string addition + assignment //! //! Note that since we have two lints where one subsumes the other, we try to //! disable the subsumed lint unless it has a higher level use rustc::lint::*; use rustc_front::hir::*; use syntax::codemap::Spanned; use eq_op::is_exp_equal; use utils::{match_type, span_lint, walk_ptrs_ty, get_parent_expr}; use utils::STRING_PATH; /// **What it does:** This lint matches code of the form `x = x + y` (without `let`!). It is `Allow` by default. /// /// **Why is this bad?** Because this expression needs another copy as opposed to `x.push_str(y)` (in practice LLVM will usually elide it, though). Despite [llogiq](https://github.com/llogiq)'s reservations, this lint also is `allow` by default, as some people opine that it's more readable. /// /// **Known problems:** None. Well apart from the lint being `allow` by default. :smile: /// /// **Example:** /// /// ``` /// let mut x = "Hello".to_owned(); /// x = x + ", World"; /// ``` declare_lint! { pub STRING_ADD_ASSIGN, Allow, "using `x = x + ..` where x is a `String`; suggests using `push_str()` instead" } /// **What it does:** The `string_add` lint matches all instances of `x + _` where `x` is of type `String`, but only if [`string_add_assign`](#string_add_assign) does *not* match. It is `Allow` by default. /// /// **Why is this bad?** It's not bad in and of itself. However, this particular `Add` implementation is asymmetric (the other operand need not be `String`, but `x` does), while addition as mathematically defined is symmetric, also the `String::push_str(_)` function is a perfectly good replacement. Therefore some dislike it and wish not to have it in their code. /// /// That said, other people think that String addition, having a long tradition in other languages is actually fine, which is why we decided to make this particular lint `allow` by default. /// /// **Known problems:** None /// /// **Example:** /// /// ``` /// let x = "Hello".to_owned(); /// x + ", World" /// ``` declare_lint! { pub STRING_ADD, Allow, "using `x + ..` where x is a `String`; suggests using `push_str()` instead" } #[derive(Copy, Clone)] pub struct StringAdd; impl LintPass for StringAdd { fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray { lint_array!(STRING_ADD, STRING_ADD_ASSIGN) } } impl LateLintPass for StringAdd { fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext, e: &Expr) { if let ExprBinary(Spanned{ node: BiAdd, .. }, ref left, _) = e.node { if is_string(cx, left) { if let Allow = cx.current_level(STRING_ADD_ASSIGN) { // the string_add_assign is allow, so no duplicates } else { let parent = get_parent_expr(cx, e); if let Some(ref p) = parent { if let ExprAssign(ref target, _) = p.node { // avoid duplicate matches if is_exp_equal(cx, target, left) { return; } } } } span_lint(cx, STRING_ADD, e.span, "you added something to a string. \ Consider using `String::push_str()` instead"); } } else if let ExprAssign(ref target, ref src) = e.node { if is_string(cx, target) && is_add(cx, src, target) { span_lint(cx, STRING_ADD_ASSIGN, e.span, "you assigned the result of adding something to this string. \ Consider using `String::push_str()` instead"); } } } } fn is_string(cx: &LateContext, e: &Expr) -> bool { match_type(cx, walk_ptrs_ty(cx.tcx.expr_ty(e)), &STRING_PATH) } fn is_add(cx: &LateContext, src: &Expr, target: &Expr) -> bool { match src.node { ExprBinary(Spanned{ node: BiAdd, .. }, ref left, _) => is_exp_equal(cx, target, left), ExprBlock(ref block) => block.stmts.is_empty() && block.expr.as_ref().map_or(false, |expr| is_add(cx, expr, target)), _ => false } }