bootstrap: rust-docs is a default package
This will cause it to be built as part of `make dist`.
This is blocking betas and nightlies.
r? @alexcrichton
On cases of malformed format strings where a `{` hasn't been properly
escaped, like `println!("{");`, present a note explaining how to escape
the `{` char.
Group unused import warnings per import list
Given a file
``` rust
use std::collections::{BinaryHeap, BTreeMap, BTreeSet};
fn main() {}
```
Show a single warning, instead of three for each unused import:
``` nocode
warning: unused imports, #[warn(unused_imports)] on by default
--> file2.rs:1:24
|
1 | use std::collections::{BinaryHeap, BTreeMap, BTreeSet};
| ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^
```
Include support for lints pointing at `MultilineSpan`s, instead of just
`Span`s.
Fixes#16132.
This commit configures our `.travis.yml` to test the full suite of tests we have
on Buildbot right now. A whole mess of docker images are added to the `src/ci`
directory which represent all the build environments for each configuration.
Each of these environments is then configured in `.travis.yml` to run on the
auto branch.
Note that the full matrix of tests aren't intended to be run on all PRs.
Instead, we continue to run only one entry in the matrix, forcing all others to
finish quickly. Only the `auto` branch should run the full matrix of builds.
Also note that the infrastructure hasn't quite been allocated yet to the
rust-lang/rust repository, so everything is disabled for now except for the one
build that happens on PRs. Once that infrastructure is allocated though we can
enable this and let it fly!
Notable modifications from the current test suite today:
* Android tests are run in rustbuild instead of the makefiles, for whatever
reason I couldn't get the makefiles to work on Travis.
* A debuginfo test was updated to work with the current version of the Android
NDK.
* Some dependencies in `mk/tests.mk` were fixed to allow running tests in
parallel.
Show one error for duplicated type definitions
For the following code:
``` rustc
struct Bar;
struct Bar;
fn main () {
}
```
show
``` nocode
error[E0428]: a type named `Bar` has already been defined in this module
--> src/test/compile-fail/E0428.rs:12:1
|
11 | struct Bar;
| ----------- previous definition of `Bar` here
12 | struct Bar;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
instead of
``` nocode
error[E0428]: a type named `Bar` has already been defined in this module
--> src/test/compile-fail/E0428.rs:12:1
|
11 | struct Bar;
| ----------- previous definition of `Bar` here
12 | struct Bar;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0428]: a value named `Bar` has already been defined in this module
--> src/test/compile-fail/E0428.rs:12:1
|
11 | struct Bar;
| ----------- previous definition of `Bar` here
12 | struct Bar;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
Fixes#35767.
Don't spin expanding stmt macros.
If we can't make progress when parsing a macro expansion as a statement then we should just bail.
This alleviates the symptoms shown in e.g. #37113 and #37234 but it doesn't fix the problem that parsing invalid enum bodies (and others) leaves the parser in a crappy state.
I'm not sold on this strategy (checking `tokens_consumed`), so if anyone has a better idea, I'm all ears!
Make E0243/E0244 message consistent with E0107
E0243/E0233 prints `expected {}, found {}` on the span note, while E0107 prints it on the first line. This is confusing when both error occur simultaneously.
This PR makes E0243/E0233 print `expected {}, found {}` on the first line.
Code:
``` rust
struct Foo<'a, 'b> {
s: &'a str,
t: &'b str,
}
type Bar<T, U> = Foo<T, U>;
```
rustc output (before):
```
error[E0107]: wrong number of lifetime parameters: expected 2, found 0
--> test.rs:6:18
|
6 | type Bar<T, U> = Foo<T, U>;
| ^^^^^^^^^ expected 2 lifetime parameters
error[E0244]: wrong number of type arguments
--> test.rs:6:18
|
6 | type Bar<T, U> = Foo<T, U>;
| ^^^^^^^^^ expected no type arguments, found 2
```
rustc output (after):
```
error[E0107]: wrong number of lifetime parameters: expected 2, found 0
--> /tmp/test.rs:6:18
|
6 | type Bar<T, U> = Foo<T, U>;
| ^^^^^^^^^ expected 2 lifetime parameters
error[E0244]: wrong number of type arguments: expected 0, found 2
--> /tmp/test.rs:6:18
|
6 | type Bar<T, U> = Foo<T, U>;
| ^^^^^^^^^ expected no type arguments
```
std: Update compiler-rt for more ABI fixes
This update of compiler-rt includes rust-lang/compiler-rt#26 which provides a
targeted fix to the powisf2 intrinsics to keep #37559 fixed but also address
the new issue of #37630. I've also [written up my thoughts][1] on why it appears
that this is the correct fix for now (hoepfully at least).
Closes#37630
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-rt/pull/26#issuecomment-259751998
This teaches `format_args!` how to interpret format printf- and
shell-style format directives. This is used in cases where there are
unused formatting arguments, and the reason for that *might* be because
the programmer is trying to use the wrong kind of formatting string.
This was prompted by an issue encountered by simulacrum on the #rust IRC
channel. In short: although `println!` told them that they weren't using
all of the conversion arguments, the problem was in using printf-syle
directives rather than ones `println!` would undertand.
Where possible, `format_args!` will tell the programmer what they should
use instead. For example, it will suggest replacing `%05d` with `{:0>5}`,
or `%2$.*3$s` with `{1:.3$}`. Even if it cannot suggest a replacement,
it will explicitly note that Rust does not support that style of directive,
and direct the user to the `std::fmt` documentation.
While the commit message on this one sounds terrible, it's really not so
bad. The issue is that our test runner _expects_ a `fn main() {}` in
code blocks that it'll test, but this code really shouldn't have them.
If it did, then clicking the "play" link in the docs would result in
play.rust-lang.org not treating this code as a test example to be run.
Don't provide hint to add lifetime on impl items that implement a trait.
```rust
use std::str::FromStr;
pub struct Foo<'a> {
field: &'a str,
}
impl<'a> FromStr for Foo<'a> {
type Err = ();
fn from_str(path: &str) -> Result<Self, ()> {
Ok(Foo { field: path })
}
}
```
would give the following hint:
```nocode
help: consider using an explicit lifetime parameter as shown: fn from_str(path: &'a str) -> Result<Self, ()>
--> <anon>:9:5
|
9 | fn from_str(path: &str) -> Result<Self, ()> {
| ^
```
which is never correct, since then there will be a lifetime mismatch
between the impl and the trait.
Remove this hint for impl items that implement a trait.
Discussed in #37546 the libs team reached the conclusion that a default zero
duration seems like a reasonable implementation of the `Default` trait.
Closes#37546
proc_macro_plugin: Wrap nonexistent filename in <>
I'm not sure how big of an issue this can become in practice, but `FileMap`s made from something that's not a file are supposed to wrap the file name in `<>`.
For an example fix, see kevinmehall/rust-peg@332fd4dbae. There, it caused cargo to always recompile a crate using rust-peg, even when nothing was changed, because cargo sees that the dummy file doesn't exist.
Fix regression involving custom derives on items with `$crate`
The regression was introduced in #37213.
I believe we cannot make the improvements from #37213 work with the current custom derive setup (c.f. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37637#issuecomment-258959145) -- we'll have to wait for `TokenStream`'s API to improve.
Fixes#37637.
r? @nrc
This update of compiler-rt includes rust-lang/compiler-rt#26 which provides a
targeted fix to the powisf2 intrinsics to keep #37559 fixed but also address
the new issue of #37630. I've also [written up my thoughts][1] on why it appears
that this is the correct fix for now (hoepfully at least).
Closes#37630
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-rt/pull/26#issuecomment-259751998
Without these changes, play.rust-lang.org (as of today) would wrap
our examples in `fn main() {}`. This prevents the user from being able
to easily run the tests.
