by using an opaque type obligation to bubble up comparisons between opaque types and other types
Also uses proper obligation causes so that the body id works, because out of some reason nll uses body ids for logic instead of just diagnostics.
This means we stop supporting the case where a locally defined trait has only a single impl so we can always use that impl (see nested-tait-inference.rs).
by using an opaque type obligation to bubble up comparisons between opaque types and other types
Also uses proper obligation causes so that the body id works, because out of some reason nll uses body ids for logic instead of just diagnostics.
Return an indexmap in `all_local_trait_impls` query
The data structure previously used here required that `DefId` be `Ord`. As part of #90317, we do not want `DefId` to implement `Ord`.
debuginfo: Make sure that type names for closure and generator environments are unique in debuginfo.
Before this change, closure/generator environments coming from different instantiations of the same generic function were all assigned the same name even though they were distinct types with potentially different data layout. Now we append the generic arguments of the originating function to the type name.
This commit also emits `{closure_env#0}` as the name of these types in order to disambiguate them from the accompanying closure function (which keeps being called `{closure#0}`). Previously both were assigned the same name.
NOTE: Changing debuginfo names like this can break pretty printers and other debugger plugins. I think it's OK in this particular case because the names we are changing were ambiguous anyway. In general though it would be great to have a process for doing changes like these.
[explicit_counter_loop] suggests `.into_iter()`, despite that triggering [into_iter_on_ref] in some cases
I have modified `fn make_iterator_snippet` in clippy_lints/src/loops/utils.rs ,so this change has some little influence on another lint [manual_flatten] .
fixes#8155
---
changelog: Fix that [`explicit_counter_loop`] suggests `into_iter()` despite that triggering [`into_iter_on_ref`] in some cases
Previously, tidy-html5 (`tidy`) would complain about a few things in our
HTML. The main thing is that `<summary>` tags can't contain `<div>`s.
That's easily fixed by changing out the `<div>`s for `<span>`s with
`display: block`.
However, there's also a rule that `<span>`s can't contain heading
elements. `<span>` permits only "phrasing content"
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/span, and
`<h3>` (and friends) are "Flow content, heading content, palpable
content".
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/Heading_Elements
We have a wrapping `<div>` that goes around each `<h3>`/`<h4>`,
etc. We turn that into a `<section>` rather than a `<span>` because
`<section>` permits "flow content".
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/section
After this change we get only three warnings from tidy, run on
struct.String.html:
line 6 column 10790 - Warning: trimming empty <span>
line 1 column 1118 - Warning: <link> proprietary attribute "disabled"
line 1 column 1193 - Warning: <link> proprietary attribute "disabled"
The empty `<span>` is a known issue - there's a span in front of the
search box to work around a strange Safari issue.
The `<link>` attributes are the non-default stylesheets. We can probably
refactor theme application to avoid using this proprietary "disabled"
attribute.
Fix two incorrect "it's" (typos in comments)
Found one of these while reading the documentation online. The other came up because it's in the same file.
Add missing | between print options
The help text for the newly stabilized print option is missing a | between stack-protector-strategies and link-args.
Fix incorrect panic message in example
The panic message when calling the `connect()` should probably be a message about connection failure, not a message about binding address failure.
Document valid values of the char type
As discussed at #93392, the current documentation on what constitutes a valid char isn't very detailed and is partly on the MAX constant rather than the type itself.
This PR expands on that information, stating the actual numerical range, giving examples of what won't work, and also mentions how a `char` might be a valid USV but still not be a defined character (terminology checked against [Unicode 14.0, table 2-3](https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ch02.pdf#M9.61673.TableTitle.Table.22.Types.of.Code.Points)).
