`mut_range_bound` check for immediate break after mutation
closes#7532
`mut_range_bound` ignores mutation on range bounds that is placed immediately before break. Still warns if the break is not always reachable.
changelog: [`mut_range_bound`] ignore range bound mutations before immediate break
Suggest deriving traits if possible
This only applies to builtin derives as I don't think there is a
clean way to get the available derives in typeck.
Closes#85851
Remove `hir::GenericBound::Unsized`
Rather than "moving" the `?Sized` bounds to the param bounds, just also check where clauses in `astconv`. I also did some related cleanup here, but that's not strictly neccesary. Also going to do a perf run here.
r? `@estebank`
Fix handling of +whole-archive native link modifier.
This PR fixes a bug in `add_upstream_native_libraries` that led to the `+whole-archive` modifier being ignored when linking in native libs.
~~Note that the PR does not address the situation when `+whole-archive` is combined with `+bundle`.~~
`@wesleywiser's` commit adds validation code that turns combining `+whole-archive` with `+bundle` into an error.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88085.
r? `@petrochenkov`
cc `@wesleywiser` `@gcoakes`
BTreeMap/BTreeSet::from_iter: use bulk building to improve the performance
Bulk building is a common technique to increase the performance of building a fresh btree map. Instead of inserting items one-by-one, we sort all the items beforehand then create the BtreeMap in bulk.
Benchmark
```
./x.py bench library/alloc --test-args btree::map::from_iter
```
* Before
```
test btree::map::from_iter_rand_100 ... bench: 3,694 ns/iter (+/- 840)
test btree::map::from_iter_rand_10_000 ... bench: 1,033,446 ns/iter (+/- 192,950)
test btree::map::from_iter_seq_100 ... bench: 5,689 ns/iter (+/- 1,259)
test btree::map::from_iter_seq_10_000 ... bench: 861,033 ns/iter (+/- 118,815)
```
* After
```
test btree::map::from_iter_rand_100 ... bench: 3,033 ns/iter (+/- 707)
test btree::map::from_iter_rand_10_000 ... bench: 775,958 ns/iter (+/- 105,152)
test btree::map::from_iter_seq_100 ... bench: 2,969 ns/iter (+/- 336)
test btree::map::from_iter_seq_10_000 ... bench: 258,292 ns/iter (+/- 29,364)
```
Mmap the incremental data instead of reading it.
Instead of reading the full incremental state using `fs::read_file`, we memmap it using a private read-only file-backed map.
This allows the system to reclaim any memory we are not using, while ensuring we are not polluted by
outside modifications to the file.
Suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83036#issuecomment-800458082 by `@bjorn3`
Pin bootstrap checksums and add a tool to update it automatically
⚠️⚠️ This is just a proactive hardening we're performing on the build system, and it's not prompted by any known compromise. If you're aware of security issues being exploited please [check out our responsible disclosure page](https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/security). ⚠️⚠️
---
This PR aims to improve Rust's supply chain security by pinning the checksums of the bootstrap compiler downloaded by `x.py`, preventing a compromised `static.rust-lang.org` from affecting building the compiler. The checksums are stored in `src/stage0.json`, which replaces `src/stage0.txt`. This PR also adds a tool to automatically update the bootstrap compiler.
The changes in this PR were originally discussed in [Zulip](https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/stream/241545-t-release/topic/pinning.20stage0.20hashes.html).
## Potential attack
Before this PR, an attacker who wanted to compromise the bootstrap compiler would "just" need to:
1. Gain write access to `static.rust-lang.org`, either by compromising DNS or the underlying storage.
2. Upload compromised binaries and corresponding `.sha256` files to `static.rust-lang.org`.
There is no signature verification in `x.py` as we don't want the build system to depend on GPG. Also, since the checksums were not pinned inside the repository, they were downloaded from `static.rust-lang.org` too: this only protected from accidental changes in `static.rust-lang.org` that didn't change the `*.sha256` files. The attack would allow the attacker to compromise past and future invocations of `x.py`.
## Mitigations introduced in this PR
This PR adds pinned checksums for all the bootstrap components in `src/stage0.json` instead of downloading the checksums from `static.rust-lang.org`. This changes the attack scenario to:
1. Gain write access to `static.rust-lang.org`, either by compromising DNS or the underlying storage.
2. Upload compromised binaries to `static.rust-lang.org`.
3. Land a (reviewed) change in the `rust-lang/rust` repository changing the pinned hashes.
Even with a successful attack, existing clones of the Rust repository won't be affected, and once the attack is detected reverting the pinned hashes changes should be enough to be protected from the attack. This also enables further mitigations to be implemented in following PRs, such as verifying signatures when pinning new checksums (removing the trust on first use aspect of this PR) and adding a check in CI making sure a PR updating the checksum has not been tampered with (see the future improvements section).
## Additional changes
There are additional changes implemented in this PR to enable the mitigation:
* The `src/stage0.txt` file has been replaced with `src/stage0.json`. The reasoning for the change is that there is existing tooling to read and manipulate JSON files compared to the custom format we were using before, and the slight challenge of manually editing JSON files (no comments, no trailing commas) are not a problem thanks to the new `bump-stage0`.
* A new tool has been added to the repository, `bump-stage0`. When invoked, the tool automatically calculates which release should be used as the bootstrap compiler given the current version and channel, gathers all the relevant checksums and updates `src/stage0.json`. The tool can be invoked by running:
```
./x.py run src/tools/bump-stage0
```
* Support for downloading releases from `https://dev-static.rust-lang.org` has been removed, as it's not possible to verify checksums there (it's customary to replace existing artifacts there if a rebuild is warranted). This will require a change to the release process to avoid bumping the bootstrap compiler on beta before the stable release.
## Future improvements
* Add signature verification as part of `bump-stage0`, which would require the attacker to also obtain the release signing keys in order to successfully compromise the bootstrap compiler. This would be fine to add now, as the burden of installing the tool to verify signatures would only be placed on whoever updates the bootstrap compiler, instead of everyone compiling Rust.
* Add a check on CI that ensures the checksums in `src/stage0.json` are the expected ones. If a PR changes the stage0 file CI should also run the `bump-stage0` tool and fail if the output in CI doesn't match the committed file. This prevents the PR author from tweaking the output of the tool manually, which would otherwise be close to impossible for a human to detect.
* Automate creating the PRs bumping the bootstrap compiler, by setting up a scheduled job in GitHub Actions that runs the tool and opens a PR.
* Investigate whether a similar mitigation can be done for "download from CI" components like the prebuilt LLVM.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Change scope of temporaries in match guards
Each pattern in a match arm has its own copy of the match guard in MIR, with its own temporary, so it has to be dropped before the the guards are joined to the single copy of the arm. This PR changes `then_else_break` to allow it to put the temporary in the innermost scope possible. This change isn't done for `if` expressions because that affects a large number of mir-opt tests and could more significantly affect performance.
closes#88649
r? `@oli-obk`
Remove SmallVector mention
SmallVector is long gone, as it's been first replaced
by OneVector in commit e5e6375352,
which then has been removed entirely in favour of SmallVec in
commit 130a32fa72.
Document when to use Windows' `symlink_dir` vs. `symlink_file`
It was previously unclear why there are two functions and when they should be used.
Fixes: #88635
Add tests for some const generics issues
closes#82956closes#84659closes#86530closes#86535
there is also a random test in here about array repeat expressions that I already had on this branch but it seems to fit the theme of this PR so kept it...
r? `@lcnr`
Improve structured tuple struct suggestion
Previously, the span was just for the constructor name, which meant it
would result in syntactically-invalid code when applied. Now, the span
is for the entire expression.
I also changed it to use `span_suggestion_verbose`, for two reasons:
1. Now that the suggestion span has been corrected, the output is a bit
cluttered and hard to read. Putting the suggestion its own window
creates more space.
2. It's easier to see what's being suggested, since now the version
after the suggestion is applied is shown.
r? `@davidtwco`
