This is the kind of change that one is expected to need to make to
accommodate overloaded-`box`.
----
Note that this is not *all* of the changes necessary to accommodate
Issue 22181. It is merely the subset of those cases where there was
already a let-binding in place that made it easy to add the necesasry
type ascription.
(For unnamed intermediate `Box` values, one must go down a different
route; `Box::new` is the option that maximizes portability, but has
potential inefficiency depending on whether the call is inlined.)
----
There is one place worth note, `run-pass/coerce-match.rs`, where I
used an ugly form of `Box<_>` type ascription where I would have
preferred to use `Box::new` to accommodate overloaded-`box`. I
deliberately did not use `Box::new` here, because that is already done
in coerce-match-calls.rs.
----
Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
closure kind, thereby detecting what happens if there are
mismatches. Simply removing the `:` annotations caused most of these
tests to pass or produce other errors, because the inference would
convert the closure into a more appropriate kind. (The ability to
override the inference by using the expected type is an important
backdoor partly for this reason.)
This fixes the categorization of the upvars of procs (represented internally
as once fns) to consider usage to require a loan. In doing so, upvars are no
longer allowed to be moved out of repeatedly in loops and such.
Closes#10398Closes#12041Closes#12127
