Emit specific warning to clarify that `#[no_mangle]` should not be applied on foreign statics or functions
Foreign statics and foreign functions should not have `#[no_mangle]` applied, as it does nothing to the name and has some extra hidden behavior that is normally unwanted. There was an existing warning for this, but it says the attribute is only allowed on "statics or functions", which to the user can be confusing.
This PR adds a specific version of the unused `#[no_mangle]` warning that explains that the target is a *foreign* static or function and that they do not need the attribute.
Fixes#78989
rustc_target: `TyAndLayout::field` should never error.
This refactor (making `TyAndLayout::field` return `TyAndLayout` without any `Result` around it) is based on a simple observation, regarding `TyAndLayout::field`:
If `cx.layout_of(ty)` succeeds (for some `cx` and `ty`), then `.field(cx, i)` on the resulting `TyAndLayout` should *always* succeed in computing `cx.layout_of(field_ty)` (where `field_ty` is the type of the `i`th field of `ty`).
The reason for this is that no matter which field is chosen, `cx.layout_of(field_ty)` *will have already been computed*, as part of computing `cx.layout_of(ty)`, as we cannot determine the layout of *any* type without considering the layouts of *all* of its fields.
And so it should be fine to turn any errors into ICEs, since they likely indicate a `cx` mismatch, or some other edge case that is due to a compiler bug (as opposed to ever being an user-facing error).
<hr/>
Each commit should probably be reviewed separately, though note that there's some `where` clauses (in `rustc_target::abi::call::*`) that change in most commits.
cc `@nagisa` `@oli-obk`
Improve detection of generics on lang items
Adds detection for the required generics for all lang items. Many lang items require an exact or minimum amount of generic arguments and if they don't exist, the compiler will ICE. This does not add any additional validation about bounds on generics or any other lang item restrictions.
Fixes one of the ICEs in #87573
cc `@FabianWolff`
Improve liveness analysis for generators
Liveness analysis for generators assumes that execution always continues
normally after a yield point, not accounting for the fact that generator
could be dropped before completion.
If generators captures any variables by reference, those variables could
be used within a generator, or when the generator completes, but also
after each yield point in the case the generator is dropped.
Account for the case when generator is dropped after yielding, but
before running to the completion. This effectively considers all
variables captured by reference to be used after a yield point.
Fixes#84292.
Liveness analysis for generators assumes that execution always continues
normally after a yield point, not accounting for the fact that generator
could be dropped before completion.
If generators captures any variables by reference, those variables could
be used within a generator, or when the generator completes, but also
after each yield point in the case the generator is dropped.
Account for the case when generator is dropped after yielding, but
before running to the completion. This effectively considers all
variables captured by reference to be used after a yield point.
Remove `Session.used_attrs` and move logic to `CheckAttrVisitor`
Instead of updating global state to mark attributes as used,
we now explicitly emit a warning when an attribute is used in
an unsupported position. As a side effect, we are to emit more
detailed warning messages (instead of just a generic "unused" message).
`Session.check_name` is removed, since its only purpose was to mark
the attribute as used. All of the callers are modified to use
`Attribute.has_name`
Additionally, `AttributeType::AssumedUsed` is removed - an 'assumed
used' attribute is implemented by simply not performing any checks
in `CheckAttrVisitor` for a particular attribute.
We no longer emit unused attribute warnings for the `#[rustc_dummy]`
attribute - it's an internal attribute used for tests, so it doesn't
mark sense to treat it as 'unused'.
With this commit, a large source of global untracked state is removed.
Warn about unreachable code following an expression with an uninhabited type
This pull request fixes#85071. The issue is that liveness analysis currently is "smarter" than reachability analysis when it comes to detecting uninhabited types: Unreachable code is detected during type checking, where full type information is not yet available. Therefore, the check for type inhabitedness is quite crude:
fc81ad22c4/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs (L202-L205)
i.e. it only checks for `!`, but not other, non-trivially uninhabited types, such as empty enums, structs containing an uninhabited type, etc. By contrast, liveness analysis, which runs after type checking, can benefit from the more sophisticated `tcx.is_ty_uninhabited_from()`:
fc81ad22c4/compiler/rustc_passes/src/liveness.rs (L981)fc81ad22c4/compiler/rustc_passes/src/liveness.rs (L996)
This can lead to confusing warnings when a variable is reported as unused, but the use of the variable is not reported as unreachable. For instance:
```rust
enum Foo {}
fn f() -> Foo {todo!()}
fn main() {
let x = f();
let _ = x;
}
```
currently leads to
```
warning: unused variable: `x`
--> t1.rs:5:9
|
5 | let x = f();
| ^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_x`
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
warning: 1 warning emitted
```
which is confusing, because `x` _appears_ to be used in line 6. With my changes, I get:
```
warning: unreachable expression
--> t1.rs:6:13
|
5 | let x = f();
| --- any code following this expression is unreachable
6 | let _ = x;
| ^ unreachable expression
|
= note: `#[warn(unreachable_code)]` on by default
note: this expression has type `Foo`, which is uninhabited
--> t1.rs:5:13
|
5 | let x = f();
| ^^^
warning: unused variable: `x`
--> t1.rs:5:9
|
5 | let x = f();
| ^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_x`
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
warning: 2 warnings emitted
```
My implementation is slightly inelegant because unreachable code warnings can now be issued in two different places (during type checking and during liveness analysis), but I think it is the solution with the least amount of unnecessary code duplication, given that the new warning integrates nicely with liveness analysis, where unreachable code is already implicitly detected for the purpose of finding unused variables.
Instead of updating global state to mark attributes as used,
we now explicitly emit a warning when an attribute is used in
an unsupported position. As a side effect, we are to emit more
detailed warning messages (instead of just a generic "unused" message).
`Session.check_name` is removed, since its only purpose was to mark
the attribute as used. All of the callers are modified to use
`Attribute.has_name`
Additionally, `AttributeType::AssumedUsed` is removed - an 'assumed
used' attribute is implemented by simply not performing any checks
in `CheckAttrVisitor` for a particular attribute.
We no longer emit unused attribute warnings for the `#[rustc_dummy]`
attribute - it's an internal attribute used for tests, so it doesn't
mark sense to treat it as 'unused'.
With this commit, a large source of global untracked state is removed.
Add future-incompat lint for `doc(primitive)`
## What is `doc(primitive)`?
`doc(primitive)` is an attribute recognized by rustdoc which adds documentation for the built-in primitive types, such as `usize` and `()`. It has been stable since Rust 1.0.
## Why change anything?
`doc(primitive)` is useless for anyone outside the standard library. Since rustdoc provides no way to combine the documentation on two different primitive items, you can only replace the docs, and since the standard library already provides extensive documentation there is no reason to do so.
While fixing rustdoc's handling of primitive items (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87073) I discovered that even rustdoc's existing handling of primitive items was broken if you had more than two crates using it (it would pick randomly between them). That meant both:
- Keeping rustdoc's existing treatment was nigh-impossible, because it was random.
- doc(primitive) was even more useless than it would otherwise be.
The only use-case for this outside the standard library is for no-std libraries which want to link to primitives (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73423) which is being fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87073.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87073 makes various breaking changes to `doc(primitive)` (breaking in the sense that they change the semantics, not in that they cause code to fail to compile). It's not possible to avoid these and still fix rustdoc's issues.
## What can we do about it?
As shown by the crater run (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87050#issuecomment-886166706), no one is actually using doc(primitive), there wasn't a single true regression in the whole run. We can either:
1. Feature gate it completely, breaking anyone who crater missed. They can easily fix the breakage just by removing the attribute.
2. add it to the `INVALID_DOC_ATTRIBUTES` future-incompat lint, and at the same time make it a no-op unless you add a feature gate. That would mean rustdoc has to look at the features of dependent crates, because it needs to know where primitives are defined in order to link to them.
3. add it to `INVALID_DOC_ATTRIBUTES`, but still use it to determine where primitives come from
4. do nothing; the behavior will silently change in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87073.
My preference is for 2, but I would also be happy with 1 or 3. I don't think we should silently change the behavior.
This PR currently implements 3.
Move naked function ABI check to its own lint
This check was previously categorized under the lint named
`UNSUPPORTED_NAKED_FUNCTIONS`. That lint is future incompatible and will
be turned into an error in a future release. However, as defined in the
Constrained Naked Functions RFC, this check should only be a warning.
This is because it is possible for a naked function to be implemented in
such a way that it does not break even the undefined ABI. For example, a
`jmp` to a `const`.
Therefore, this patch defines a new lint named
`UNDEFINED_NAKED_FUNCTION_ABI` which contains just this single check.
Unlike `UNSUPPORTED_NAKED_FUNCTIONS`, `UNDEFINED_NAKED_FUNCTION_ABI`
will not be converted to an error in the future.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
In most calling conventions, accessing function parameters may require
stack access. However, naked functions have no assembly prelude to set
up stack access. This is why naked functions may only contain a single
`asm!()` block. All parameter access is done inside the `asm!()` block,
so we cannot validate the liveness of the input parameters. Therefore,
we should disable the lint for naked functions.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
This check was previously categorized under the lint named
`UNSUPPORTED_NAKED_FUNCTIONS`. That lint is future incompatible and will
be turned into an error in a future release. However, as defined in the
Constrained Naked Functions RFC, this check should only be a warning.
This is because it is possible for a naked function to be implemented in
such a way that it does not break even the undefined ABI. For example, a
`jmp` to a `const`.
Therefore, this patch defines a new lint named
`UNDEFINED_NAKED_FUNCTION_ABI` which contains just this single check.
Unlike `UNSUPPORTED_NAKED_FUNCTIONS`, `UNDEFINED_NAKED_FUNCTION_ABI`
will not be converted to an error in the future.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
rustc: Replace `HirId`s with `LocalDefId`s in `AccessLevels` tables
and passes using those tables - primarily privacy checking, stability checking and dead code checking.
All these passes work with definitions rather than with arbitrary HIR nodes.
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@lambinoo` (#87487)
rfc3052 followup: Remove authors field from Cargo manifests
Since RFC 3052 soft deprecated the authors field, hiding it from
crates.io, docs.rs, and making Cargo not add it by default, and it is
not generally up to date/useful information for contributors, we may as well
remove it from crates in this repo.
Since RFC 3052 soft deprecated the authors field anyway, hiding it from
crates.io, docs.rs, and making Cargo not add it by default, and it is
not generally up to date/useful information, we should remove it from
crates in this repo.
