Fix edits for `convert_named_struct_to_tuple_struct`
Two fixes:
- When replacing syntax nodes, macro files weren't taken into account. Edits were simply made for `node.syntax().text_range()`, which would be wrong range when `node` is inside a macro file.
- We do ancestor node traversal for every struct name reference to find record expressions/patterns to edit, but we didn't verify that expressions/patterns do actually refer to the struct we're operating on.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
Fixes#13780Fixes#14927
Previously we didn't verify that record expressions/patterns that were
found did actually point to the struct we're operating on. Moreover,
when that record expressions/patterns had missing child nodes, we would
continue traversing their ancestor nodes.
This removes an existing generic param from the `GenericParamList`. It
also considers to remove the extra colon & whitespace to the previous
sibling.
* change order to get all param types first and mark them as mutable
before the first edit happens
* add helper function to remove a generic parameter
* fix test output
This adds a new assist named "replace named generic with impl" to move
the generic param type from the generic param list into the function
signature.
```rust
fn new<T: ToString>(input: T) -> Self {}
```
becomes
```rust
fn new(input: impl ToString) -> Self {}
```
The first step is to determine if the assist can be applied, there has
to be a match between generic trait param & function paramter types.
* replace function parameter type(s) with impl
* add new `impl_trait_type` function to generate the new trait bounds with `impl` keyword for use in the
function signature
fix: assists no longer break indentation
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/14674
These are _ad hoc_ patches for a number of assists that can produce incorrectly indented code, namely:
- generate_derive
- add_missing_impl_members
- add_missing_default_members
Some general solution is required in future, as the same problem arises in many other assists, e.g.
- replace_derive_with...
- generate_default_from_enum...
- generate_default_from_new
- generate_delegate_methods
(the list is incomplete)
Restrict "sort items" assist for traits & impls
This restricts the "sort items alphabetically" assist when the selection is inside a `Impl` or `Trait` node & intersects with one of the associated items.
It re-orders the conditional checks of AST nodes in the `sort_items` function to check for more specific nodes first before checking `Trait` or `Impl` nodes. The `AssistContext` is passed into the `add_sort_methods_assist` function to check if the selection intersects with any inner items, e.g. associated const or type alias, function. In this case the assist does not apply.
Fixes: #14516
This fixes the applicability of the "sort items alphabetically" assist
when the selection is inside a `Trait` or `Impl`. It's now tested if the
selection is inside or overlaps with an inner node, e.g. associated
const or type alias, function.
minor: Fix some simple FIXMEs
Each FIXME fix has been split into its own commit, since they're all pretty independent changes.
(Forgot to open a PR for this a few days ago, oops)
internal: Implement Structured API for snippets
Fixes#11638 (including moving the cursor before the generated type parameter)
Adds `add_tabstop_{before,after}` for inserting tabstop snippets before & after nodes, and `add_placeholder_snippet` for wrapping nodes inside placeholder nodes.
Currently, the snippets are inserted into the syntax tree in `SourceChange::commit` so that snippet bits won't interfere with syntax lookups before completing a `SourceChange`.
It would be preferable if snippet rendering was deferred to after so that rendering can work directly with text ranges, but have left that for a future PR (it would also make it easier to finely specify which text edits have snippets in them).
Another possible snippet variation to support would be a group of placeholders (i.e. placeholders with the same tabstop number) so that a generated item and its uses can be renamed right as it's generated, which is something that is technically supported by the current snippet hack in VSCode, though it's not clear if that's a thing that is officially supported.
MIR episode 2
This PR adds:
1. `need-mut` and `unused-mut` diagnostics
2. `View mir` command which shows MIR for the body under cursor, useful for debugging
3. MIR lowering for or-patterns and for-loops
Handle trait alias definitions
Part of #2773
This PR adds a bunch of structs and enum variants for trait aliases. Trait aliases should be handled as an independent item because they are semantically distinct from traits.
I basically started by adding `TraitAlias{Id, Loc}` to `hir_def::item_tree` and iterated adding necessary stuffs until compiler stopped complaining what's missing. Let me know if there's still anything I need to add.
I'm opening up this PR for early review and stuff. I'm planning to add tests for IDE functionalities in this PR, but not type-related support, for which I put FIXME notes.
Beginning of MIR
This pull request introduces the initial implementation of MIR lowering and interpreting in Rust Analyzer.
The implementation of MIR has potential to bring several benefits:
- Executing a unit test without compiling it: This is my main goal. It can be useful for quickly testing code changes and print-debugging unit tests without the need for a full compilation (ideally in almost zero time, similar to languages like python and js). There is a probability that it goes nowhere, it might become slower than rustc, or it might need some unreasonable amount of memory, or we may fail to support a common pattern/function that make it unusable for most of the codes.
- Constant evaluation: MIR allows for easier and more correct constant evaluation, on par with rustc. If r-a wants to fully support the type system, it needs full const eval, which means arbitrary code execution, which needs MIR or something similar.
- Supporting more diagnostics: MIR can be used to detect errors, most famously borrow checker and lifetime errors, but also mutability errors and uninitialized variables, which can be difficult/impossible to detect in HIR.
- Lowering closures: With MIR we can find out closure capture modes, which is useful in detecting if a closure implements the `FnMut` or `Fn` traits, and calculating its size and data layout.
But the current PR implements no diagnostics and doesn't support closures. About const eval, I removed the old const eval code and it now uses the mir interpreter. Everything that is supported in stable rustc is either implemented or is super easy to implement. About interpreting unit tests, I added an experimental config, disabled by default, that shows a `pass` or `fail` on hover of unit tests (ideally it should be a button similar to `Run test` button, but I didn't figured out how to add them). Currently, no real world test works, due to missing features including closures, heap allocation, `dyn Trait` and ... so at this point it is only useful for me selecting what to implement next.
The implementation of MIR is based on the design of rustc, the data structures are almost copy paste (so it should be easy to migrate it to a possible future stable-mir), but the lowering and interpreting code is from me.
Assist: desugar doc-comment
My need for this arose due to wanting to do feature dependent documentation and therefor convert parts of my doc-comments to attributes.
Not sure about the pub-making of the other handlers functions, but I didn't think it made much sense to reimplement them.
Add action to expand a declarative macro once, inline. Fixes#13598
This commit adds a new r-a method, `expandMacroInline`, which expands the macro that's currently selected. See #13598 for the most applicable issue; though I suspect it'll resolve part of #5949 and make #11888 significantly easier).
The macro works like this:
I have 2 questions before this PR can be merged:
1. **Should we rustfmt the output?** The advantage of doing this is neater code. The disadvantages are we'd have to format the whole expr/stmt/block (since there's no point just formatting one part, especially over multiple lines), and maybe it moves the code around more in weird ways. My suggestion here is to start off by not doing any formatting; and if it appears useful we can decide to do formatting in a later release.
2. **Is it worth solving the `$crate` hygiene issue now?** -- I think this PR is usable as of right now for some use-cases; but it is annoying that many common macros (i.e. `println!()`, `format!()`) can't be expanded further unless the user guesses the correct `$crate` value. The trouble with solving that issue is that I think it's complicated and imperfect. If we do solve it; we'd also need to either change the existing `expandMacro`/`expandMacroInline` commands; provide some option to allow/disallow `$crate` expanding; or come to some other compromise.
fix: generate async delegate methods
Fixes a bug where the generated async method doesn't await the result before returning it.
This is an example of what the output looked like:
```rust
struct Age<T>(T);
impl<T> Age<T> {
pub(crate) async fn age<J, 'a>(&'a mut self, ty: T, arg: J) -> T {
self.0
}
}
struct Person<T> {
age: Age<T>,
}
impl<T> Person<T> {
pub(crate) async fn age<J, 'a>(&'a mut self, ty: T, arg: J) -> T {
self.age.age(ty, arg) // .await is missing
}
}
```
The `.await` is missing, so the return type is `impl Future<Output = T>` instead of `T`
add wrapping/checked/saturating assist
This addresses #13452
I'm not sure about the structure of the code. I'm not sure if it needs to be 3 separate assists, and if that means it needs to be in 3 separate files as well.
Most of the logic is in `util.rs`, which feels funny to me, but there seems to be a pattern of 1 assist per file, and this seems better than duplicating the logic.
Let me know if anything needs changes 😁
fix a bunch of clippy lints
fixes a bunch of clippy lints for fun and profit
i'm aware of this repo's position on clippy. The changes are split into separate commits so they can be reviewed separately
This makes code more readale and concise,
moving all format arguments like `format!("{}", foo)`
into the more compact `format!("{foo}")` form.
The change was automatically created with, so there are far less change
of an accidental typo.
```
cargo clippy --fix -- -A clippy::all -W clippy::uninlined_format_args
```
Seems like these can be safely fixed. With one, I was particularly
surprised -- `Some(pats) => &**pats,` in body.rs?
```
cargo clippy --fix -- -A clippy::all -D clippy::explicit_auto_deref
```
I am not certain if this will improve performance,
but it seems having a .clone() without any need should be removed.
This was done with clippy, and manually reviewed:
```
cargo clippy --fix -- -A clippy::all -D clippy::redundant_clone
```
fix: make make_body respect comments in extract_function
Possible fix for #13621
### Points to help in review:
- Earlier we were only considering statements in a block expr and hence comments were being ignored, now we handle tokens hence making it aware of comments and then preserving them using `hacky_block_expr_with_comments`
Seems like I am not able to attach output video, github is glitching for it :(
feat: allow unwrap block in let initializers
Possible fix for #13679
### Points to help in review:
- I just added a parent case for let statements and it seems everything else was in place already, so turned out to be a small fix
fix: add fallback case in generated `PartialEq` impl
Partially fixes#13727.
When generating `PartialEq` implementations for enums, the original code can already generate the following fallback case:
```rs
_ => std::mem::discriminant(self) == std::mem::discriminant(other),
```
However, it has been suppressed in the following example for no good reason:
```rs
enum Either<T, U> {
Left(T),
Right(U),
}
impl<T, U> PartialEq for Either<T, U> {
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
match (self, other) {
(Self::Left(l0), Self::Left(r0)) => l0 == r0,
(Self::Right(l0), Self::Right(r0)) => l0 == r0,
// _ => std::mem::discriminant(self) == std::mem::discriminant(other),
// ^ this completes the match arms!
}
}
}
```
This PR has removed that suppression logic.
~~Of course, the PR could have suppressed the fallback case generation for single-variant enums instead, but I believe that this case is quite rare and should be caught by `#[warn(unreachable_patterns)]` anyway.~~
After this fix, when the enum has >1 variants, the following fallback arm will be generated :
* `_ => false,` if we've already gone through every case where the variants of `self` and `other` match;
* The original one (as stated above) in other cases.
---
Note: The code example is still wrong after the fix due to incorrect trait bounds.
Add assist to generate trait impl's
resolves#13553
This pull request adds a `generate_trait_impl` assist, which generates trait impl's for a type. It is almost the same as the one to generate impl's and I also reduced the trigger range to only outside the `RecordFieldList`. Also moved all the tests into separate test functions. A few of the old tests seemed redundant, so I didn't port them.
fix: format expression parsing edge-cases
- Handle positional arguments with formatting options (i.e. `{:b}`). Previously copied `:b` as an argument, producing broken code.
- Handle indexed positional arguments (`{0}`) ([reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/#positional-parameters)). Previously copied over `0` as an argument.
Note: the assist also breaks when named arguments are used (`"{name}$0", name = 2 + 2` is converted to `"{}"$0, name`. I'm working on fix for that as well.
Feat: extracted method from trait impl is placed in existing impl
**Before**
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183872883-3b0eafd2-d1dc-440e-9e66-38e3372f8b64.mp4
**After**
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183875769-87f34c7d-52f0-4dfc-9766-f591ee738ebb.mp4
Previously, when triggering a method extraction from within an impl trait block, then this would always create a new impl block for
the struct, even if there already is one. Now, if there is already an existing trait-less impl block, then it'll put the extracted method in there.
**Caveats**:
- It currently requires the target impl block to be non-empty. This limitation is because the current architecture takes a `node_to_insert_after` as reference for where to insert the extracted function. An empty impl block doesn't have such a reference node, since it's empty. It seems that supporting this requires a much larger and more complex change.
- This is my first contribution in rust, so apologies for any beginner mistakes.
internal: Migrate `ide_assists::utils` and `ide_assists::handlers` to use format arg captures (part 1)
This not only serves as making future migration to mutable syntax trees easier, it also finds out what needs to be migrated in the first place.
~~Aside from the first commit, subsequent commits are structured to only deal with one file/handler at a time.~~
This is the first of 3 PRs, migrating:
Utils:
- `gen_trait_fn_body`
- `render_snippet`
- `ReferenceConversion`
- `convert_type`
- `getter`
Handlers:
- `add_explicit_type`
- `add_return_type`
- `add_turbo_fish`
- `apply_demorgan`
- `auto_import`
- `convert_comment_block`
- `convert_integer_literal`
- `convert_into_to_from`
- `convert_iter_for_each_to_for`
- `convert_let_else_to_match`
- `convert_tuple_struct_to_named_struct`
- `convert_two_arm_bool_match_to_matches_macro`
- `destructure_tuple_binding`
- `extract_function`
- `extract_module`
- `extract_struct_from_enum_variant`
- `extract_type_alias`
- `extract_variable`
- `fix_visibility`
feat: add config for inserting must_use in `generate_enum_as_method`
Should fix#13312
Didn't add a test because I was not sure on how to add test for a specific configuration option, tried to look for the usages for other `AssistConfig` variants but couldn't find any in `tests`. If there is a way to test this, do point me towards it.
I tried to extract the formatting string as a common `template_string` and only have if-else for that, but it didn't compile :(
Also it seems these tests are failing:
```
test config::tests::generate_config_documentation ... FAILED
test config::tests::generate_package_json_config ... FAILED
```
Can you also point me to how to correct these 😅 ( I guess there is some command to automatically generate these? )
