When a module is declared, but no matching file exists, rustc gives
an error like 'help: name the file either foo.rs or foo/mod.rs inside
the directory "src/bar"'. However, at on windows, the backslash was
double-escaped when naming the directory.
It did this because the string was printed in debug mode ( "{:?}" ) to
surround it with quotes. However, it should just be printed like any
other directory in an error message and surrounded by escaped quotes,
rather than relying on the debug print to add quotes ( "\"{}\"" ).
Update Cargo
This includes https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/5255 which fixed regression in `cargo rustdoc` command.
If beta branches before this is merged, we'll need to backport as well
Remove universes from `ty::ParamEnv`
This change was never meant to land. #48407 takes an alternate approach. However, that PR is now blocked on some issues with canonicalization, and rebasing these reverts gets harder each time, so let's just get this bit out of the way now.
r? @nikomatsakis
Check for known but incorrect attributes
fixes#43988
- Change nested_visit_map so it will recursively check functions
- Add visit_stmt and visit_expr for impl Visitor for CheckAttrVisitor and check for incorrect
inline and repr attributes on staements and expressions
- Add regression test for issue #43988
vec::SpecFromElem provides an optimization to use calloc to fill a Vec
when the element given to fill the Vec is represented by 0.
For floats, the test for that currently used is `x == 0. &&
x.is_sign_positive()`. When compiled in a standalone function, rustc
generates the following assembly:
```
xorps xmm1, xmm1
ucomisd xmm0, xmm1
setnp al
sete cl
and cl, al
movq rax, xmm0
test rax, rax
setns al
and al, cl
ret
```
A simpler test telling us whether the value is represented by 0, is
`x.to_bits() == 0`, which rustc compiles to:
```
movq rax, xmm0
test rax, rax
sete al
ret
```
Not that the test is hot in any way, but it also makes it clearer what
the intent in the rust code is.
This fixes building the compiler docs because stage1-rustc\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\doc is used twice which
doesn't work if we still have a handle from the first time.
Fix collapse toggle insertions on impl with docs
Just went through this one randomly... When an impl has docs, the collapse toggle isn't generated. This fixes it.
r? @QuietMisdreavus
Enable target_feature on any LLVM 6+
In `LLVMRustHasFeature()`, rather than using `MCInfo->getFeatureTable()`
that is specific to Rust's LLVM fork, we can use this in LLVM 6:
/// Check whether the subtarget features are enabled/disabled as per
/// the provided string, ignoring all other features.
bool checkFeatures(StringRef FS) const;
Now rustc using external LLVM can also have `target_feature`.
r? @alexcrichton
[incremental] Don't panic if decoding the cache fails
If the cached data can't be loaded from disk, just issue a warning to
the user so they know why compilation is taking longer than usual but
don't fail the entire compilation since we can recover by ignorning the
on disk cache.
In the same way, if the disk cache can't be deserialized (because it has
been corrupted for some reason), report the issue as a warning and
continue without failing the compilation. `Decodable::decode()` tends to
panic with various errors like "entered unreachable code" or "index out
of range" if the input data is corrupted. Work around this by catching
panics from the `decode()` calls and continuing without the cached data.
Fixes#48847
Stabilize match_default_bindings
This includes a submodule update to rustfmt
in order to allow a stable feature declaration.
r? @nikomatsakis
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42640
Many of the tests this PR touches are merely testing the current lack of desired future behavior around https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44849 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44848 (cc @tschottdorf). I noticed the bullets for those items were checked on the tracking issue-- I've unchecked them, as they don't appear to have been completed and I don't see any comments indicating that we don't want to pursue them further. Still, I think it's fine to stabilize the current behavior, as I think expanding it in the future should be backwards-compatible.
Introduce a TargetTriple enum to support absolute target paths
This PR replaces target triple strings with a `TargetTriple` enum, which represents either a target triple or a path to a JSON target file. The path variant is used if the `--target` argument has a `.json` extension, else the target triple variant is used.
The motivation of this PR is support for absolute target paths to avoid the need for setting the `RUST_TARGET_PATH` environment variable (see rust-lang/cargo#4905 for more information). For places where some kind of triple is needed (e.g. in the sysroot folder), we use the file name (without extension).
For compatibility, we keep the old behavior of searching for a file named `$(target_triple).json` in `RUST_TARGET_PATH` for non-official target triples.
If the cached data can't be loaded from disk, just issue a warning to
the user so they know why compilation is taking longer than usual but
don't fail the entire compilation since we can recover by ignorning the
on disk cache.
In the same way, if the disk cache can't be deserialized (because it has
been corrupted for some reason), report the issue as a warning and
continue without failing the compilation. `Decodable::decode()` tends to
panic with various errors like "entered unreachable code" or "index out
of range" if the input data is corrupted. Work around this by catching
panics from the `decode()` calls when joining the thread and continuing
without the cached data.
Fixes#48847
An old fix for moves-in-guards had a hack for adjacent all-const match arms.
The hack was explained in a comment, which you can see here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/22580/files#diff-402a0fa4b3c6755c5650027c6d4cf1efR497
But hack was incomplete (and thus unsound), as pointed out here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47295#issuecomment-357108458
Plus, it is likely to be at least tricky to reimplement this hack in
the new NLL borrowck.
So rather than try to preserve the hack, we want to try to just remove
it outright. (At least to see the results of a crater run.)
[breaking-change]
This is a breaking-change, but our hope is that no one is actually
relying on such an extreme special case. (We hypothesize the hack was
originally added to accommodate a file in our own test suite, not code
in the wild.)
