Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104420 (Fix doc example for `wrapping_abs`)
- #104499 (rustdoc JSON: Use `Function` everywhere and remove `Method`)
- #104500 (`rustc_ast`: remove `ref` patterns)
- #104511 (Mark functions created for `raw-dylib` on x86 with DllImport storage class)
- #104595 (Add `PolyExistentialPredicate` type alias)
- #104605 (deduplicate constant evaluation in cranelift backend)
- #104628 (Revert "Update CI to use Android NDK r25b")
- #104662 (Streamline deriving on packed structs.)
- #104667 (Revert formatting changes of a test)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Streamline deriving on packed structs.
The current approach to field accesses in derived code:
- Normal case: `&self.0`
- In a packed struct that derives `Copy`: `&{self.0}`
- In a packed struct that doesn't derive `Copy`: `let Self(ref x) = *self`
The `let` pattern used in the third case is equivalent to the simpler field access in the first case. This commit changes the third case to use a field access.
The commit also combines two boolean arguments (`is_packed` and `always_copy`) into a single field (`copy_fields`) earlier, to save passing both around.
r? ``@jackh726``
deduplicate constant evaluation in cranelift backend
The cranelift backend had two matches on `ConstantKind`, which can be avoided, and used this `eval_for_mir` that nothing else uses... this makes things more consistent with the (better-tested) LLVM backend.
I noticed this because cranelift was the only user of `eval_for_mir`. However `try_eval_for_mir` still has one other user in `eval`... the odd thing is that the interpreter has its own `eval_mir_constant` which seems to duplicate the same functionality and does not use `try_eval_for_mir`. No idea what is happening here.
r? ``@bjorn3``
Cc ``@lcnr``
Add `PolyExistentialPredicate` type alias
Wrapping `ExistentialPredicate`s in a binder is very common, and this alias already exists for the `PolyExistential{TraitRef,Projection}` types.
Mark functions created for `raw-dylib` on x86 with DllImport storage class
Fix for #104453
## Issue Details
On x86 Windows, LLVM uses 'L' as the prefix for any private global symbols (`PrivateGlobalPrefix`), so when the `raw-dylib` feature creates an undecorated function symbol that begins with an 'L' LLVM misinterprets that as a private global symbol that it created and so fails the compilation at a later stage since such a symbol must have a definition.
## Fix Details
Mark the function we are creating for `raw-dylib` with `DllImport` storage class (this was already being done for MSVC at a later point for `callee::get_fn` but not for GNU (due to "backwards compatibility")): this will cause LLVM to prefix the name with `__imp_` and so it won't mistake it for a private global symbol.
Support using `Self` or projections inside an RPIT/async fn
I reuse the same idea as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103449 to use variances to encode whether a lifetime parameter is captured by impl-trait.
The current implementation of async and RPIT replace all lifetimes from the parent generics by `'static`. This PR changes the scheme
```rust
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
fn foo<'b, T>() -> impl Into<Self> + 'b { ... }
}
opaque Foo::<'_a>::foo::<'_b, T>::opaque<'b>: Into<Foo<'_a>> + 'b;
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
// OLD
fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'static>::foo::<'static, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
^^^^^^^ the `Self` becomes `Foo<'static>`
// NEW
fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'a>::foo::<'b, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
^^ the `Self` stays `Foo<'a>`
}
```
There is the same issue with projections. In the example, substitute `Self` by `<T as Trait<'b>>::Assoc` in the sugared version, and `Foo<'_a>` by `<T as Trait<'_b>>::Assoc` in the desugared one.
This allows to support `Self` in impl-trait, since we do not replace lifetimes by `'static` any more. The same trick allows to use projections like `T::Assoc` where `Self` is allowed. The feature is gated behind a `impl_trait_projections` feature gate.
The implementation relies on 2 tweaking rules for opaques in 2 places:
- we only relate substs that correspond to captured lifetimes during TypeRelation;
- we only list captured lifetimes in choice region computation.
For simplicity, I encoded the "capturedness" of lifetimes as a variance, `Bivariant` vs `Invariant` for unused vs captured lifetimes. The `variances_of` query used to ICE for opaques.
Impl-trait that do not reference `Self` or projections will have their variances as:
- `o` (invariant) for each parent type or const;
- `*` (bivariant) for each parent lifetime --> will not participate in borrowck;
- `o` (invariant) for each own lifetime.
Impl-trait that does reference `Self` and/or projections will have some parent lifetimes marked as `o` (as the example above), and participate in type relation and borrowck. In the example above, `variances_of(opaque) = ['_a: o, '_b: *, T: o, 'b: o]`.
r? types
cc `@compiler-errors` , as you asked about the issue with `Self` and projections.
The current approach to field accesses in derived code:
- Normal case: `&self.0`
- In a packed struct that derives `Copy`: `&{self.0}`
- In a packed struct that doesn't derive `Copy`: `let Self(ref x) = *self`
The `let` pattern used in the third case is equivalent to the simpler
field access in the first case. This commit changes the third case to
use a field access.
The commit also combines two boolean arguments (`is_packed` and
`always_copy`) into a single field (`copy_fields`) earlier, to save
passing both around.
Pass 128-bit C-style enum enumerator values to LLVM
Pass the full 128 bits of C-style enum enumerators through to LLVM. This means that debuginfo for C-style repr128 enums is now emitted correctly for DWARF platforms (as compared to not being correctly emitted on any platform).
Tracking issue: #56071
Add a detailed note for missing comma typo w/ FRU syntax
Thanks to `@pierwill` for working on this with me!
Fixes#104373, perhaps `@alice-i-cecile` can comment on the new error for the example provided on that issue -- feedback is welcome.
```
error[E0063]: missing field `defaulted` in initializer of `Outer`
--> $DIR/multi-line-fru-suggestion.rs:14:5
|
LL | Outer {
| ^^^^^ missing `defaulted`
|
note: this expression may have been misinterpreted as a `..` range expression
--> $DIR/multi-line-fru-suggestion.rs:16:16
|
LL | inner: Inner {
| ________________^
LL | | a: 1,
LL | | b: 2,
LL | | }
| |_________^ this expression does not end in a comma...
LL | ..Default::default()
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ... so this is interpreted as a `..` range expression, instead of functional record update syntax
help: to set the remaining fields from `Default::default()`, separate the last named field with a comma
|
LL | },
| +
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0063`.
```
Check fat pointer metadata compatibility modulo regions
Regions don't really mean anything anyways during hir typeck.
If this `erase_regions` makes anyone nervous, it's probably equally valid to just equate the types using a type relation, but regardless we should _not_ be using strict type equality while region variables are present.
Fixes#103384
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103901 (Add tracking issue for `const_arguments_as_str`)
- #104112 (rustdoc: Add copy to the description of repeat)
- #104435 (`VecDeque::resize` should re-use the buffer in the passed-in element)
- #104467 (Fix substraction with overflow in `wrong_number_of_generic_args.rs`)
- #104608 (Cleanup macro matching recovery)
- #104626 (Fix doctest errors related to rustc_middle)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Cleanup macro matching recovery
The retry has been implemented already in #104335. Also removes a `HACK` comment that's not really needed anymore because the "don't recover during macro matching" isn't really a hack but correct behavior.
Fix substraction with overflow in `wrong_number_of_generic_args.rs`
Fixes#104287
This issue happens in the `suggest_moving_args_from_assoc_fn_to_trait_for_qualified_path` function, which seems to run before the error checking facilities can catch an invalid use of generic arguments. Thus we get a subtraction with overflow because the code implicitly assumes that the source program makes sense (or is this assumption not true even if the program is correct?).
try_normalize_after_erasing_regions: promote an assertion to always run
In https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2433 this assertion has been seen to trigger, so it might be worth actually checking this? Regressing debug assertions are very easy to miss until much later, and then they become quite hard to debug.
Rarranging the substration and equality check into an addition and an equality
check is sufficient.
Algebra is cool, isn't it?
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
