r? @graydon Also, notably, make rustpkgtest depend on the rustpkg executable (otherwise, tests that shell out to rustpgk might run when rustpkg doesn't exist).
This commit allows you to write:
extern mod x = "a/b/c";
which means rustc will search in the RUST_PATH for a package with
ID a/b/c, and bind it to the name `x` if it's found.
Incidentally, move get_relative_to from back::rpath into std::path
env! aborts compilation of the specified environment variable is not
defined and takes an optional second argument containing a custom
error message. option_env! creates an Option<&'static str> containing
the value of the environment variable.
There are no run-pass tests that check the behavior when the environment
variable is defined since the test framework doesn't support setting
environment variables at compile time as opposed to runtime. However,
both env! and option_env! are used inside of rustc itself, which should
act as a sufficient test.
Fixes#2248.
This is a fairly large rollup, but I've tested everything locally, and none of
it should be platform-specific.
r=alexcrichton (bdfdbdd)
r=brson (d803c18)
r=alexcrichton (a5041d0)
r=bstrie (317412a)
r=alexcrichton (135c85e)
r=thestinger (8805baa)
r=pcwalton (0661178)
r=cmr (9397fe0)
r=cmr (caa4135)
r=cmr (6a21d93)
r=cmr (4dc3379)
r=cmr (0aa5154)
r=cmr (18be261)
r=thestinger (f10be03)
env! aborts compilation of the specified environment variable is not
defined and takes an optional second argument containing a custom
error message. option_env! creates an Option<&'static str> containing
the value of the environment variable.
There are no run-pass tests that check the behavior when the environment
variable is defined since the test framework doesn't support setting
environment variables at compile time as opposed to runtime. However,
both env! and option_env! are used inside of rustc itself, which should
act as a sufficient test.
Close#2248
This is a reopening of #8182, although this removes any abuse of the compiler internals. Now it's just a pure syntax extension (hard coded what the attribute names are).
Some general clean-up relating to deriving:
- `TotalOrd` was too eager, and evaluated the `.cmp` call for every field, even if it could short-circuit earlier.
- the pointer types didn't have impls for `TotalOrd` or `TotalEq`.
- the Makefiles didn't reach deep enough into libsyntax for dependencies.
(Split out from https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/8258.)
- Made naming schemes consistent between Option, Result and Either
- Changed Options Add implementation to work like the maybe monad (return None if any of the inputs is None)
- Removed duplicate Option::get and renamed all related functions to use the term `unwrap` instead
Previously it would call:
f(sf1.cmp(&of1), f(sf2.cmp(&of2), ...))
(where s/of1 = 'self/other field 1', and f was
std::cmp::lexical_ordering)
This meant that every .cmp subcall got evaluated when calling a derived
TotalOrd.cmp.
This corrects this to use
let test = sf1.cmp(&of1);
if test == Equal {
let test = sf2.cmp(&of2);
if test == Equal {
// ...
} else {
test
}
} else {
test
}
This gives a lexical ordering by short-circuiting on the first comparison
that is not Equal.
This is preparation for removing `@fn`.
This does *not* use default methods yet, because I don't know
whether they work. If they do, a forthcoming PR will use them.
This also changes the precedence of `as`.
The pipes compiler produced data types that encoded efficient and safe
bounded message passing protocols between two endpoints. It was also
capable of producing unbounded protocols.
It was useful research but was arguably done before its proper time.
I am removing it for the following reasons:
* In practice we used it only for producing the `oneshot` protcol and
the unbounded `stream` protocol and all communication in Rust use those.
* The interface between the proto! macro and the standard library
has a large surface area and was difficult to maintain through
language and library changes.
* It is now written in an old dialect of Rust and generates code
which would likely be considered non-idiomatic.
* Both the compiler and the runtime are difficult to understand,
and likewise the relationship between the generated code and
the library is hard to understand. Debugging is difficult.
* The new scheduler implements `stream` and `oneshot` by hand
in a way that will be significantly easier to maintain.
This shouldn't be taken as an indication that 'channel protocols'
for Rust are not worth pursuing again in the future.
Concerned parties may include: @graydon, @pcwalton, @eholk, @bblum
The most likely candidates for closing are #7666, #3018, #3020, #7021, #7667, #7303, #3658, #3295.
The pipes compiler produced data types that encoded efficient and safe
bounded message passing protocols between two endpoints. It was also
capable of producing unbounded protocols.
It was useful research but was arguably done before its proper time.
I am removing it for the following reasons:
* In practice we used it only for producing the `oneshot` and `stream`
unbounded protocols and all communication in Rust use those.
* The interface between the proto! macro and the standard library
has a large surface area and was difficult to maintain through
language and library changes.
* It is now written in an old dialect of Rust and generates code
which would likely be considered non-idiomatic.
* Both the compiler and the runtime are difficult to understand,
and likewise the relationship between the generated code and
the library is hard to understand. Debugging is difficult.
* The new scheduler implements `stream` and `oneshot` by hand
in a way that will be significantly easier to maintain.
This shouldn't be taken as an indication that 'channel protocols'
for Rust are not worth pursuing again in the future.
Change the former repetition::
for 5.times { }
to::
do 5.times { }
.times() cannot be broken with `break` or `return` anymore; for those
cases, use a numerical range loop instead.
Assertions without a message get a generated message that consists of a
prefix plus the stringified expression that is being asserted. That
prefix is currently a unique string, while a static string would be
sufficient and needs less code.
Assertions without a message get a generated message that consists of a
prefix plus the stringified expression that is being asserted. That
prefix is currently a unique string, while a static string would be
sufficient and needs less code.
