Point only to the identifiers in the typo suggestions of shadowed names instead of the entire struct
Fixes#103358.
As discussed in the issue, the `Span` of the candidate `Ident` for a typo replacement is stored alongside its `Symbol` in `TypoSuggestion`. Then, the span of the identifier is what the "you might have meant to refer to" note is pointed at, rather than the entire struct definition.
Comments in #103111 and the issue both suggest that it is desirable to:
1. include names defined in the same crate as the typo,
2. ignore names defined elsewhere such as in `std`, _and_
3. include names introduced indirectly via `use`.
Since a name from another crate but introduced via `use` has non-local `def_id`, to achieve this, a suggestion is displayed if either the `def_id` of the suggested name is local, or the `span` of the suggested name is in the same file as the typo itself.
Some UI tests have also been modified to reflect this change.
r? `@cjgillot`
resolve: Revert "Set effective visibilities for imports more precisely"
In theory the change was correct, but in practice the use of import items in HIR is limited and hacky, and it expects that (effective) visibilities for all (up to) 3 IDs of the import are set to the value reflecting (effective) visibility of the whole syntactic `use` item rather than its individual components.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102352
r? `@oli-obk`
Fix the bug of next_point in source_map
There is a bug in `next_point`, the new span won't move to next position when be called in the first time.
For this reason, our current code is working like this:
1. When we really want to move to the next position, we called two times of `next_point`
2. Some code which use `next_point` actually done the same thing with `shrink_to_hi`
This fix make sure when `next_point` is called, span will move with the width at least 1, and also work correctly in the scenario of multiple bytes.
Ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103140#discussion_r997710998
r? `@davidtwco`
More dupe word typos
I only picked those changes (from the regex search) that I am pretty certain doesn't change meaning and is just a typo fix. Do correct me if any fix is undesirable and I can revert those. Thanks.
unify `IsPattern` and `IsImport` enum in `show_candidates`
Follow-up of #102876
A binding cannot appear in both pattern and import at the same time, so it makes sense to unify them
r? `@compiler-errors`
Check uniqueness of impl items by trait item when applicable.
When checking uniqueness of item names in impl blocks, we currently use the same definition of hygiene as for toplevel items. This means that a plain item and one generated by a macro 2.0 do not collide.
This hygiene rule does not match with how impl items resolve to associated trait items. As a consequence, we misdiagnose the trait impls.
This PR proposes to consider that trait impl items are uses of the corresponding trait items during resolution, instead of checking for duplicates later. An error is emitted when a trait impl item is used twice.
There should be no stable breakage, since macros 2.0 are still unstable.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
cc ``@RalfJung``
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71614.
Move lifetime resolution module to rustc_hir_analysis.
Now that lifetime resolution has been removed from it, this file has nothing to do in `rustc_resolve`. It's purpose is to compute Debruijn indices for lifetimes, so let's put it in type collection.
