781: Refactor to allow for multiple assists r=matklad a=eulerdisk
This is necessary to allow assist "providers" (which currently are simple free function) to produce multiple assists. I'm not sure this is the best possible refactoring tough.
Co-authored-by: Andrea Pretto <eulerdisk@gmail.com>
762: "Dumb" auto import assist r=matklad a=eulerdisk
This adds a new assist to "add xxx::yyy to the current file" when the cursor is on a PATH. It manages correctly nested imports,`self` keyword and creates new nested imports if necessary. [See the tests]
It doesn't use name resolution so in that sense is 'dumb', but I have plans to do that. That in the future will be useful to auto import trait names in autocompletion for example.
It can easily be extended to provide multiple actions to select in which scope to import. That's another thing I plan to do.
@matklad I copied some indentation code from `ide_light`, I don't know at the moment if/how you want to refactor that code. This assist was meant to be in `ide_light`.
Co-authored-by: Andrea Pretto <eulerdisk@gmail.com>
770: Fix introduce var duplicating newlines r=matklad a=vipentti
This fixes#713.
If the block before the statement we want to use introduce var on, had empty
lines these empty lines would also be added between the let-statement and
the current line where the new variable is used.
This fixes that by trimming excess newlines from the start of the indent chunk
and simply adding a single newline (when the chunk had newlines) between the
let-statement and the current statement. If there were no newlines this
matches the previous behaviour.
Co-authored-by: Ville Penttinen <villem.penttinen@gmail.com>
This fixes#713.
If the block before the statement we want to use introduce var on, had empty
lines these empty lines would also be added between the let-statement and
the current line where the new variable is used.
This fixes that by trimming excess newlines from the start of the indent chunk
and simply adding a single newline (when the chunk had newlines) between the
let-statement and the current statement. If there were no newlines this
matches the previous behaviour.
