Pin::new_unchecked: discuss pinning closure captures
Regardless of how the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102737 turns out, pinning closure captures is super subtle business and probably worth discussing separately.
Since `decl_macro`s and/or `Span::def_site()` is deemed quite unstable,
no public-facing macro that relies on it can hope to be, itself, stabilized.
We circumvent the issue by no longer relying on field privacy for safety and,
instead, relying on an unstable feature-gate to act as the gate keeper for
non users of the macro (thanks to `allow_internal_unstable`).
This is technically not correct (since a `nightly` user could technically enable
the feature and cause unsoundness with it); or, in other words, this makes the
feature-gate used to gate the access to the field be (technically unsound, and
in practice) `unsafe`. Hence it having `unsafe` in its name.
Back to the macro, we go back to `macro_rules!` / `mixed_site()`-span rules thanks
to declaring the `decl_macro` as `semitransparent`, which is a hack to basically have
`pub macro_rules!`
Co-Authored-By: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve link tooltips in alloc::fmt
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve link tooltips in alloc::{rc, sync}
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve link tooltips in alloc::string
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks in alloc::vec
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks in core::option
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve a few link tooltips in core::result
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks in core::{iter::{self, iterator}, stream::stream, poll}
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve a few link tooltips in std::{fs, path}
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks in std::{collections, time}
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks in and make formatting of `&str`-like types consistent in std::ffi::{c_str, os_str}
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve link tooltips in std::ffi
----------
Fix spacing for links inside code blocks, and improve a few link tooltips
in std::{io::{self, buffered::{bufreader, bufwriter}, cursor, util}, net::{self, addr}}
----------
Fix typo in link to `into` for `OsString` docs
----------
Remove tooltips that will probably become redundant in the future
----------
Apply suggestions from code review
Replacing `…std/primitive.reference.html` paths with just `reference`
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <github@jyn.dev>
----------
Also replace `…std/primitive.reference.html` paths with just `reference` in `core::pin`
The `Unpin` bound was originally added in #56939 following the
recommendation of @withoutboats in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55766#issue-378417538
That comment does not give explicit justification for why the bound
should be added. The relevant context was:
> [ ] Remove `impl<P> Unpin for Pin<P>`
>
> This impl is not justified by our standard justification for unpin
> impls: there is no pointer direction between `Pin<P>` and `P`. Its
> usefulness is covered by the impls for pointers themselves.
>
> This futures impl (link to the impl changed in this PR) will need to
> change to add a `P: Unpin` bound.
The decision to remove the unconditional impl of `Unpin for Pin` is
sound (these days there is just an auto-impl for when `P: Unpin`). But,
I think the decision to also add the `Unpin` bound for `impl Future` may
have been unnecessary. Or if that's not the case, I'd be very interested
to have the argument for why written down somewhere. The bound _appears_
to not be needed, since the presence of a `Pin<P>` should indicate that
it's safe to project to `Pin<&mut P::Target>` just like for
`Pin::as_mut`.
Make the following methods unstable const under the `const_pin` feature:
- `new`
- `new_unchecked`
- `into_inner`
- `into_inner_unchecked`
- `get_ref`
- `into_ref`
Also adds tests for these methods in a const context.
Tracking issue: #76654
Use Arc::clone and Rc::clone in documentation
This PR replaces uses of `x.clone()` by `Rc::clone(&x)` (or `Arc::clone(&x)`) to better match the documentation for those types.
@rustbot modify labels: T-doc
- Use intra-doc links for `std::io` in `std::fs`
- Use intra-doc links for File::read in unix/ext/fs.rs
- Remove explicit intra-doc links for `true` in `net/addr.rs`
- Use intra-doc links in alloc/src/sync.rs
- Use intra-doc links in src/ascii.rs
- Switch to intra-doc links in alloc/rc.rs
- Use intra-doc links in core/pin.rs
- Use intra-doc links in std/prelude
- Use shorter links in `std/fs.rs`
`io` is already in scope.
Reference lang items during AST lowering
Fixes#60607 and fixes#61019.
This PR introduces `QPath::LangItem` to the HIR and uses it in AST lowering instead of constructing a `hir::Path` from a slice of symbols:
- Credit for much of this work goes to @matthewjasper, I basically just [rebased their earlier work](a227c706b7 (diff-c0f791ead38d2d02916faaad0f56f41d)).
- ~~Changes to Clippy might not be correct, they compile but attempting to run tests through `./x.py` produced failures which appeared spurious, so I didn't run any clippy tests.~~
- Changes to save analysis might not be correct - tests pass but I don't have a lot of confidence in those changes being correct.
- I've used `GenericBounds::LangItemTrait` rather than changing `PolyTraitRef`, as suggested by @matthewjasper [in this comment](a227c706b7 (r40107992)) but I'd prefer that be left for a follow-up.
- I've split things into smaller commits fairly arbitrarily to make the diff easier to review, each commit should compile but might not pass tests until the final commit.
r? @oli-obk
cc @matthewjasper
