[rustdoc] Calculate span information on demand instead of storing it ahead of time
This brings `size_of<clean::types::Span>()` down from over 100 bytes (!!) to only 12, the same as rustc. It brings `Item` down even more, from `784` to `680`.
~~TODO: I need to figure out how to do this for the JSON backend too. That uses `From` impls everywhere, which don't allow passing in the `Session` as an argument. `@P1n3appl3,` `@tmandry,` maybe one of you have ideas?~~ Figured it out, fortunately only two functions needed to be changed. I like the `convert_x()` format better than `From` everywhere but I'm open to feedback.
Helps with #79103
Rewrite update-all-references bash scripts in Rust
This replaces the `update-all-references` scripts with a single
cargo dev bless
command. It should behave mostly the same as the bash scripts. The major difference is, that it can be called from the project root and will always update the files in all of the test suites.
cc #5394
changelog: none
Create `rustc_type_ir`
Decided to start small 😄
This PR creates a `rustc_type_ir` crate as part of the WG-Traits plan to create a shared type library.
~~There already exists a `rustc_ty` crate, so I named the new crate `rustc_ty_library`. However I think it would make sense to rename the current `rustc_ty` to something else (e.g. `rustc_ty_passes`) to free the name for this new crate.~~
r? `@jackh726`
Fixes: #79569Fixes: #79566Fixes: #79565
For the first issue (#79569), I got hit a `debug_assert!()` before
encountering the reported error message (because I have `debug = true`
enabled in my config.toml).
The assertion showed me that some `SwitchInt`s can have more than one
target pointing to the same `BasicBlock`.
I had thought that was invalid, but since it seems to be possible, I'm
allowing this now.
I added a new test for this.
----
In the last two cases above, both tests (intentionally) fail to compile,
but the `InstrumentCoverage` pass is invoked anyway.
The MIR starts with an `Unreachable` `BasicBlock`, which I hadn't
encountered before. (I had assumed the `InstrumentCoverage` pass
would only be invoked with MIRs from successful compilations.)
I don't have test infrastructure set up to test coverage on files that
fail to compile, so I didn't add a new test.
Capture precise paths in THIR and MIR
This PR allows THIR and MIR to use the result of the new capture analysis to actually capture precise paths
To achieve we:
- Writeback min capture results to TypeckResults
- Move handling upvars to PlaceBuilder in mir_build
- Lower precise paths in THIR build by reading min_captures
- Search for ancestors in min_capture when trying to build a MIR place which starts off of an upvar
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/10
Partly implements: rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#18
Work that remains (not in this PR):
- [ ] [Known bugs when feature gate is enabled](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/projects/1?card_filter_query=label%3Abug)
- [ ] Use min_capure_map for
- [ ] Liveness analysis
- [ ] rustc_mir/interpret/validity.rs
- [ ] regionck
- [ ] rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#8
- [ ] remove closure_captures and upvar_capture_map
r? `@ghost`
Apply `doc(cfg)` from parent items while collecting trait impls
Because trait impls bypass the standard `clean` hierarchy they do not participate in the `propagate_doc_cfg` pass, so instead we need to pre-collect all possible `doc(cfg)` attributes that will apply to them when cleaning.
fixes#79201
📌 Pin Clippy to a nightly 📌
changelog: Pin Clippy to a specific nightly version (No more master/custom toolchain required to compile Clippy)
Addresses partially #5561. As proposed there in [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5561#issuecomment-623109095), this kicks off the process, to help us get acquainted with how the syncs should work, before working on improving the tooling.
Open questions:
* When performing a rustup, we will need to exclude the commits that were merged that same day, or else wait until that nightly is released. I did not update the documentation about this part, mainly because I'm not sure about how to do that.
* When should we perform the rustups now? My first idea is to do it at the same time we do the clippyups, to have a clear cadence and to avoid the two copies of the repo to diverge enough to make the process painful.
* Who does the rustups now? If we follow my previous idea and do both rustup and clippyup at the same time, it would be more work for `@flip1995` who currently does the clippyups. I would prefer to establish some kind of rotation to spead the work. Other ideas?
* I'm not sure if this affects the release process in any way.
* ???
`@rust-lang/clippy` thoughts?
r? `@flip1995`
CTFE: tweak abort-on-uninhabited message
Having an "aborted execution:" makes it more consistent with the `Abort` terminator saying "the program aborted execution". Right now, at least one of the two errors will look weird in Miri.
r? `@oli-obk`
Use `def_path_hash_to_def_id` when re-using a `RawDefId`
Fixes#79890
Previously, we just copied a `RawDefId` from the 'old' map to the 'new'
map. However, the `RawDefId` for a given `DefPathHash` may be different
in the current compilation session. Using `def_path_hash_to_def_id`
ensures that the `RawDefId` we use is valid in the current session.
