Suggest `.into()` when all other coercion suggestions fail
Also removes some bogus suggestions because we now short-circuit when offering coercion suggestions(instead of, for example, suggesting every one that could possibly apply)
Fixes#102415
`Res::SelfTy` currently has two `Option`s. When the second one is `Some`
the first one is never consulted. So we can split it into two variants,
`Res::SelfTyParam` and `Res::SelfTyAlias`, reducing the size of `Res`
from 24 bytes to 12. This then shrinks `hir::Path` and
`hir::PathSegment`, which are the HIR types that take up the most space.
Neither require nor imply lifetime bounds on opaque type for well formedness
The actual hidden type can live arbitrarily longer than any individual lifetime and arbitrarily shorter than all but one of the lifetimes.
fixes#86218fixes#84305
This is a **breaking change** but it is a necessary soundness fix
implied_bounds: deal with inference vars
fixes#101951
while computing implied bounds for `<<T as ConstructionFirm>::Builder as BuilderFn<'_>>::Output` normalization replaces a projection with an inference var (adding a `Projection` obligation). Until we prove that obligation, this inference var remains unknown, which caused us to miss an implied bound necessary to prove that the unnormalized projection from the trait method signature is wf.
r? types
fix a ui test
use `into`
fix clippy ui test
fix a run-make-fulldeps test
implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`
use `OwnerId` for more queries
change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
Introduce mir::Unevaluated
Previously the distinction between unevaluated constants in the type-system and in mir was not explicit and a little confusing. Probably better to introduce its own type for that.
r? `@lcnr`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100734 (Split out async_fn_in_trait into a separate feature)
- #101664 (Note if mismatched types have a similar name)
- #101815 (Migrated the rustc_passes annotation without effect diagnostic infrastructure)
- #102042 (Distribute rust-docs-json via rustup.)
- #102066 (rustdoc: remove unnecessary `max-width` on headers)
- #102095 (Deduplicate two functions that would soon have been three)
- #102104 (Set 'exec-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0' in const-eval-select tests)
- #102112 (Allow full relro on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Note if mismatched types have a similar name
If users get a type error between similarly named types, it will point out that these are actually different types, and where they were defined.
Const unification is already infallible, remove the error handling logic
r? `@lcnr`
is this expected to be used in the future? Right now it is dead code.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101598 (Update rustc's information on Android's sanitizers)
- #102036 (Remove use of `io::ErrorKind::Other` in std)
- #102037 (Make cycle errors recoverable)
- #102069 (Skip `Equate` relation in `handle_opaque_type`)
- #102076 (rustc_transmute: fix big-endian discriminants)
- #102107 (Add missing space between notable trait tooltip and where clause)
- #102119 (Fix a typo “pararmeter” in error message)
- #102131 (Added which number is computed in compute_float.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make cycle errors recoverable
In particular, this allows rustdoc to recover from cycle errors when normalizing associated types for documentation.
In the past, ```@jackh726``` has said we need to be careful about overflow errors: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91430#issuecomment-983997013
> Off the top of my head, we definitely should be careful about treating overflow errors the same as
"not implemented for some reason" errors. Otherwise, you could end up with behavior that is
different depending on recursion depth. But, that might be context-dependent.
But cycle errors should be safe to unconditionally report; they don't depend on the recursion depth, they will always be an error whenever they're encountered.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81091.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@matthewjasper```
Normalize opaques w/ bound vars
First, we reenable normalization of opaque types with escaping late bound regions to fix rust-lang/miri#2433. This essentially reverts #89285.
Second, we mitigate the perf regression found in #88862 by simplifying the way that we relate (sub and eq) GeneratorWitness types.
This relies on the fact that we construct these GeneratorWitness types somewhat particularly (with all free regions found in the witness types replaced with late bound regions) -- but those bound regions really should be treated as existential regions, not universal ones. Those two facts leads me to believe that we do not need to use the full `higher_ranked_sub` machinery to relate two generator witnesses. I'm pretty confident that this is correct, but I'm glad to discuss this further.
Move and rename `SessionDiagnostic` & `SessionSubdiagnostic` traits and macros
After PR #101434, we want to:
- [x] Move `SessionDiagnostic` to `rustc_errors`.
- [x] Add `emit_` methods that accept `impl SessionDiagnostic` to `Handler`.
- [x] _(optional)_ Rename trait `SessionDiagnostic` to `DiagnosticHandler`.
- [x] _(optional)_ Rename macro `SessionDiagnostic` to `DiagnosticHandler`.
- [x] Update Rustc Dev Guide and Docs to reflect these changes. https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1460
Now I am having build issues getting the compiler to build when trying to rename the macro.
<details>
<summary>See diagnostics errors and context when building.</summary>
```
error: diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
--> compiler/rustc_attr/src/session_diagnostics.rs:13:10
|
13 | #[derive(DiagnosticHandler)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ in this derive macro expansion
|
::: /Users/jhonny/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/synstructure-0.12.6/src/macros.rs:94:9
|
94 | / pub fn $derives(
95 | | i: $crate::macros::TokenStream
96 | | ) -> $crate::macros::TokenStream {
| |________________________________________- in this expansion of `#[derive(DiagnosticHandler)]`
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> compiler/rustc_attr/src/lib.rs:10:9
|
10 | #![deny(rustc::diagnostic_outside_of_impl)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
And also this one:
```
error: diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
--> compiler/rustc_attr/src/session_diagnostics.rs:213:32
|
213 | let mut diag = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
> **Note**
> Can't find where this message is coming from, because you can see in [this experimental branch](https://github.com/JhonnyBillM/rust/tree/experimental/trying-to-rename-session-diagnostic-macro) that I updated all errors and diags to say:
> error: diagnostics should only be created in **`DiagnosticHandler`**/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
> and not:
> error: diagnostics should only be created in **`SessionDiagnostic`**/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
</details>
I tried building the compiler in different ways (playing with the stages etc), but nothing worked.
## Question
**Do we need to build or do something different when renaming a macro and identifiers?**
For context, see experimental commit f2193a98b4 where the macro and symbols are renamed, but it doesn't compile.
FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs
UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic
[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`
FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way
DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method
FIX - broken test
FIX - Rebase conflict
UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
In particular, this allows rustdoc to recover from cycle errors when normalizing associated types for documentation.
In the past, `@jackh726` has said we need to be careful about overflow errors:
> Off the top of my head, we definitely should be careful about treating overflow errors the same as
"not implemented for some reason" errors. Otherwise, you could end up with behavior that is
different depending on recursion depth. But, that might be context-dependent.
But cycle errors should be safe to unconditionally report; they don't depend on the recursion depth, they will always be an error whenever they're encountered.
