These docs were very out of date and misleading. They even said that
they codegen'd the *AST*!
For some reason, the `rustc_codegen_ssa::base` docs were exactly
identical to the `rustc_codegen_llvm::base` docs. They didn't really
make sense, because they had LLVM-specific information even though
`rustc_codegen_ssa` is supposed to be somewhat generic. So I removed
them as they were misleading.
Turn helper method into a closure
`replace_prefix` is currently implemented as a method but has no real relation
to the struct it is implemented on. Turn it into a closure and move it into the
only method from which it is called.
`@rustbot` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
r? `@lcnr`
rustc_span: Provide a reserved identifier check for a specific edition
while keeping edition evaluation lazy because it may be expensive.
Needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80226.
Add module-level docs to rustc_middle::ty
I thought it would be nice to point out `Ty` and `TyCtxt` on the module page, and link out to the [rustc-dev-guide chapter](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/ty.html).
docs: Edit rustc_middle::ty::query::on_disk_cache
Expand abbreviations for "incremental compliation".
Also added the word "to" to the description of CacheEncoder.
Reduce memory consumption by sharing the previous dependency graph's
edges with the current graph when it is known to be valid to do so. It
is known to be valid whenever we mark a node green because all of its
dependencies were green. It is *not* known to be valid when we mark a
node green because we re-executed its query and its result was the same
as in the previous compilation session. In that case, the dependency set
might have changed (we don't try to determine whether or not it changed
and whether or not we can share).
Reduce memory consumption by taking advantage of red/green algorithm
properties to share the previous dependency graph's node data with the
current graph instead of storing node data redundantly. Red nodes can
share the `DepNode`, and green nodes can share the `DepNode` and
`Fingerprint`. Edges will be shared when possible in a later change.
Clarify constructor splitting in exhaustiveness checking
I reworked the explanation of the algorithm completely to make it properly account for the various extensions we've added. This includes constructor splitting, which was previously not clearly included in the algorithm. This makes wildcards less magical; I added some detailed examples; and this distinguishes clearly between constructors that only make sense in patterns (like ranges) and those that make sense for values (like `Some`). This reformulation had been floating around in my mind for a while, and I'm quite happy with how it turned out. Let me know how you feel about it.
I also factored out all three cases of splitting (wildcards, ranges and slices) into dedicated structs to encapsulate the complicated bits.
I measured no perf impact but I don't trust my local measurements for refactors since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79284.
r? `@varkor`
`@rustbot` modify labels: +A-exhaustiveness-checking
rustc_query_system: explicitly register reused dep nodes
Register nodes that we've reused from the previous session explicitly
with `OnDiskCache`. Previously, we relied on this happening as a side
effect of accessing the nodes in the `PreviousDepGraph`. For the sake of
performance and avoiding unintended side effects, register explictily.
`replace_prefix` is currently implemented as a method but has no real relation
to the struct it is implemented on. Turn it into a closure and move it into the
only method from which it is called.
