Fix overlap detection of `usize`/`isize` range patterns
`usize` and `isize` are a bit of a special case in the match usefulness algorithm, because the range of values they contain depends on the platform. Specifically, we don't want `0..usize::MAX` to count as an exhaustive match (see also [`precise_pointer_size_matching`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56354)). The way this was initially implemented is by treating those ranges like float ranges, i.e. with limited cleverness. This means we didn't catch the following as unreachable:
```rust
match 0usize {
0..10 => {},
10..20 => {},
5..15 => {}, // oops, should be detected as unreachable
_ => {},
}
```
This PRs fixes this oversight. Now the only difference between `usize` and `u64` range patterns is in what ranges count as exhaustive.
r? `@varkor`
`@rustbot` label +A-exhaustiveness-checking
- Remove the difference between `parent_item` and `current_item`; these
should never have been different.
- Remove `current_item` from `resolve` and `variant_field` so that
`Self` is only substituted in one place at the very start.
- Resolve the current item as a `DefId`, not a `HirId`. This is what
actually fixed the bug.
Hacks:
- `clean` uses `TypedefItem` when it _really_ should be
`AssociatedTypeItem`. I tried fixing this without success and hacked
around it instead (see comments)
- This stringifies DefIds, then resolves them a second time. This is
really silly and rustdoc should just use DefIds throughout. Fixing
this is a larger task than I want to take on right now.
Bump dependencies invalidly assuming memory layout of SocketAddr
Bumps net2, socket2 and miow.
Helps unblock #78802
Done as separate PR since frequent lockfile collisions is a thing... And since the main PR can't be merged until large parts of the ecosystem uses the newer crates only, so we have to start somewhere.
Update tests to remove old numeric constants
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
Don't run `resolve_vars_if_possible` in `normalize_erasing_regions`
Neither `@eddyb` nor I could figure out what this was for. I changed it to `assert_eq!(normalized_value, infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(&normalized_value));` and it passed the UI test suite.
<details><summary>
Outdated, I figured out the issue - `needs_infer()` needs to come _after_ erasing the lifetimes
</summary>
Strangely, if I change it to `assert!(!normalized_value.needs_infer())` it panics almost immediately:
```
query stack during panic:
#0 [normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions] normalizing `<str::IsWhitespace as str::pattern::Pattern>::Searcher`
#1 [needs_drop_raw] computing whether `str::iter::Split<str::IsWhitespace>` needs drop
#2 [mir_built] building MIR for `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#3 [unsafety_check_result] unsafety-checking `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#4 [mir_const] processing MIR for `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#5 [mir_promoted] processing `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#6 [mir_borrowck] borrow-checking `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#7 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate
end of query stack
```
I'm not entirely sure what's going on - maybe the two disagree?
</details>
For context, this came up while reviewing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77467/ (cc `@lcnr).`
Possibly this needs a crater run?
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@matthewjasper`
Support repr(simd) on ADTs containing a single array field
This is a squash and rebase of `@gnzlbg's` #63531
I've never actually written code in the compiler before so just fumbled my way around until it would build 😅
I imagine there'll be some work we need to do in `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too for this now, but might need some input from `@bjorn3` to know what that is.
cc `@rust-lang/project-portable-simd`
-----
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
Remove doctree::Macro and distinguish between `macro_rules!` and `pub macro`
This is a part of #78082, removing doctree::Macro. Uses the changes in #79372Fixes#76761
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
add enable-full-tools to freebsd builds to prevent occasional link er…
On FreeBSD, there is sometimes an issue where linking a rust program will fail due to rust not finding a linker, even though lld is included in the base system. This seems to mostly affect bare metal/cross compilation things, such as wasm builds and arm/riscv bare metal work (eg. when trying to compile [this](https://github.com/quantumscraps/scraps)). On Linux and other operating systems, full tools are enabled for builds of rust, so there are no linking issues. This pr should enable fully functional builds on FreeBSD, assuming rust builds correctly with these options.
Extend doc keyword feature by allowing any ident
Part of #51315.
As suggested by ``@danielhenrymantilla`` in [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51315#issuecomment-733879934), this PR extends `#[doc(keyword = "...")]` to allow any ident to be used as keyword. The final goal is to allow (proc-)macro crates' owners to write documentation of the keywords they might introduce.
r? ``@jyn514``
Improve rustdoc JS tests error output
It's pretty common when starting to add new tests for rustdoc-js to have issues to understand the errors. With this, it should make things a bit simpler. So now, in case of an error, it displays:
```
---- [js-doc-test] rustdoc-js/basic.rs stdout ----
error: rustdoc-js test failed!
failed to decode compiler output as json: line: {
output: Checking "basic" ... FAILED
==> Result not found in 'others': '{"path":"basic","name":"Fo"}'
Diff of first error:
{
"path": "basic",
- "name": "Fo",
+ "name": "Foo",
}
thread '[js-doc-test] rustdoc-js/basic.rs' panicked at 'explicit panic', src/tools/compiletest/src/json.rs:126:21
```
I think it was ``@camelid`` who asked about it a few days ago?
r? ``@jyn514``
BTreeMap: try to enhance various comments
All in internal documentation, propagating the "key-value pair" notation from public documentation.
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Rename "stability" CSS class to "item-info" and combine `document_stability` with `document_short`
Follow-up of #79300
The point of this PR is to make the CSS class more accurate since it's not only about stability anymore.
r? ``@jyn514``
Require allocator to be static for boxed `Pin`-API
Allocators has to retain their validity until the instance and all of its clones are dropped. When pinning a value, it must live forever, thus, the allocator requires a `'static` lifetime for pinning a value. [Example from reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/jymzdw/the_story_continues_vec_now_supports_custom/gd7qak2?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3):
```rust
let alloc = MyAlloc(/* ... */);
let pinned = Box::pin_in(42, alloc);
mem::forget(pinned); // Now `value` must live forever
// Otherwise `Pin`'s invariants are violated, storage invalidated
// before Drop was called.
// borrow of `memory` can end here, there is no value keeping it.
drop(alloc); // Oh, value doesn't live forever.
```
Enhance `redundant_pattern_matching` to also lint on `std::net::IpAddr`
Follow-up to #6339
r? `@ebroto`
(note: also contains a small cleanup of the other ui tests)
changelog: Enhance [`redundant_pattern_matching`] to also lint on `std::net::IpAddr`
