Remove the ability of the borrow checker to determine that repeated
dereferences of a Box<T> refer to the same memory object. This will
usually require one of two workarounds:
1) The interior of a Box<T> will sometimes need to be moved / borrowed
into a temporary before moving / borrowing individual derived paths.
2) A `ref x` pattern will have to be replaced with a `box ref x`
pattern.
Fixes#16094.
[breaking-change]
In order to prevent users from having to manually implement Hash and Ord for
bitflags types, this commit derives these traits automatically.
This breaks code that has manually implemented any of these traits for types
created by the bitflags! macro. Change this code by removing implementations
of these traits.
[breaking-change]
The correct terminology is Task-Local Data, or TLD. Task-Local Storage,
or TLS, is the old terminology that was abandoned because of the
confusion with Thread-Local Storage (TLS).
Like with libnative, when a green task failed to spawn it would leave the world
in a corrupt state where the local scheduler had been dropped as well as the
local task. Also like libnative, this patch sets up a "bomb" which when it goes
off will restore the state of the world.
Previously, the call to bookkeeping::increment() was never paired with a
decrement when the spawn failed (due to unwinding). This fixes the problem by
returning a "bomb" from increment() which will decrement on drop, and then
moving the bomb into the child task's procedure which will be dropped naturally.
When a new task fails to spawn, it triggers a task failure of the spawning task.
This ends up causing runtime aborts today because of the destructor bomb in the
Task structure. The bomb doesn't actually need to go off until *after* the task
has run at least once.
This now prevents a runtime abort when a native thread fails to spawn.
This adds support for `quote_arm!(cx, $pat => $expr)`, and `macro_rules!(($a:arm) => (...))`. It also fixes a bug in pretty printing, where this would generate invalid code:
```
match { 5i } {
1 => 2,
_ => 3,
}
```
It would generate this code:
```
match { 5i } {
1 => 2
_ => 3
}
```
Finally, it adds a couple helper methods to `ExtCtxt`.
When dealing with HTTP request or responses, many tokens are case-insensitive in the ASCII range but the bytes from the network are not necessarily valid UTF-8.
**[breaking-change]** Rather than adding new very similar traits, this re-uses the `std::ascii::OwnedStrAsciiExt` and `std::ascii::StrAsciiExt` traits, but rename to remove `Str` since that does not apply for bytes.
This PR also makes `std::ascii::ASCII_UPPER_MAP` and `std::ascii::ASCII_LOWER_MAP`, the lookup table all these methods are based on, public. In case there is something else related to ASCII case we haven’t thought of yet, that can be implemented outside of libstd without duplicating the tables.
Although this is a breaking change, I thought this could do without an RFC since the relevant traits are not in the prelude.
r? @alexcrichton
When rustc produces an rlib, it includes the contents of each static library required by the crate. Currently each static library is added individually, by extracting the library with `ar x` and adding the objects to the rlib using `ar r`. Each `ar r` has significant overhead - it appears to scan through the full contents of the rlib before adding the new files. This patch avoids most of the overhead by adding all library objects (and other rlib components) at once using a single `ar r`.
When building `librustc` (on Linux, using GNU ar), this patch gives a 60-80% reduction in linking time, from 90s to 10s one machine I tried and 25s to 8s on another. (Though `librustc` is a bit of a special case - it's a very large crate, so the rlib is large to begin with, and it also relies on a total of 45 static libraries due to the way LLVM is organized.) More reasonable crates such as `libstd` and `libcore` also get a small reduction in linking time (just from adding metadata, bitcode, and object code in one `ar` invocation instead of three), but this is not very noticeable since the time there is small to begin with (around 1s).
Closes#15296 (Update disclaimer to improve clarity and intent)
Closes#15804 (Don't ICE when dealing with the count expr for fixed array types in various places.)
Closes#15893 (lint: Improve ffi-unsafe enum lint warning)
Closes#16045 (Rename Integer divides to is_multiple_of.)
Closes#16055 (manual: update list of feature gates, add phase attribute)
Closes#16056 (Improve documentation of rounding functions)
Closes#16061 (Remove references to non-existant functions in the std::path documentation)
Closes#16062 (Fix documentation error in MutableVectorAllocating::move_from)
Closes#16063 (adding discuss.rust-lang to community)
Closes#16064 (rustc: Switch dsymutil status => output)
Closes#16066 (making raw source display better)
Closes#16079 (doc: add missing word)
Closes#16080 (Update LLVM to fix miscompilations due to wrongfully removed lifetime intrinsics)
Closes#16084 (Elide lifetimes around Arc<T>.)
Closes#16085 (Gedit/gtksourceview language spec: add raw strings)
Closes#16086 (Implement Hash for DList)
… and color (raw) strings as such in attributes.
This fixes cases where a string contains ] inside an attribute:
that ] used to incorrectly end the attribute coloring.
For large (many lines) doc comments, I’ve found preferable to use
`#![doc = r#"..."#]` to avoid prefixing every line with `//!`.
* Make the code fill up the full width of the page (no massive whitespace on the left)
* Move the code down to make it not intersect the logo
* Set a min-width and remove the max-width so that the code doesn't scroll internally, but instead scrolls the page, meaning horizontal scroll bars are always available
* Set overflow to actually overflow, just to be sure
Fixes#15891
It is being changed because the previous wording was ambiguous.
`a.divides(b)` implied `a % b == 0` but it sounds like the other way
around. `9.divides(&3) == true` but we might read that as
"does 9 divide 3?". It has been renamed to sidestep the ambiguity.
Work around the change by using `is_multiple_of` instead.
[breaking-change]
I think this is an improvement of the previous warning message, which
- like the comment that I removed implies - is in need of some
improvement.
I've opted to point the user in the right direction w.r.t how to fix the
problem, which I think is good form.
Not being familiar with the repr(...) attribute, I personally had to
check the lint rules myself to figure out what was wrong. Hopefully,
this will save he next person some time and headache.
Signed-off-by: Anton Lofgren <alofgren@op5.com>
