Commit Graph

167 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuki Okushi
23479f716a
Rollup merge of #87501 - spastorino:remove-min-tait, r=oli-obk
Remove min_type_alias_impl_trait in favor of type_alias_impl_trait

r? ``@oli-obk``
2021-07-28 18:28:19 +09:00
bors
aea2e446f0 Auto merge of #86735 - jhpratt:rfc-3107, r=petrochenkov
Implement RFC 3107: `#[derive(Default)]` on enums with a `#[default]` attribute

This PR implements RFC 3107, which permits `#[derive(Default)]` on enums where a unit variant has a `#[default]` attribute. See comments for current status.
2021-07-28 05:59:30 +00:00
Jacob Pratt
7bf791d162
Stabilize const_fn_union 2021-07-27 16:03:33 -04:00
Jacob Pratt
36f02f3523
Stabilize const_fn_transmute 2021-07-27 16:03:09 -04:00
Jacob Pratt
c70147fd66
Permit deriving default on enums with #[default] 2021-07-27 15:47:47 -04:00
bors
fd853c00e2 Auto merge of #83484 - JulianKnodt:infer, r=oli-obk,lcnr
Add hir::GenericArg::Infer

In order to extend inference to consts, make an Infer type on hir::GenericArg.
2021-07-27 16:24:45 +00:00
Santiago Pastorino
9629d798ca
Remove min_type_alias_impl_trait feature 2021-07-27 12:33:14 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
66dbeb5f23
existential_type was removed in favor of type_alias_impl_trait 2021-07-27 12:33:13 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
5bff8429a0
Use type_alias_impl_trait instead of min in compiler and lib 2021-07-27 12:27:08 -03:00
bors
998cfe5aad Auto merge of #85305 - MarcusDunn:master, r=pnkfelix
Stabilize bindings_after_at

attempting to stabilze bindings_after_at [#65490](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65490), im pretty new to the whole thing so any pointers are greatly appreciated.
2021-07-27 05:53:31 +00:00
kadmin
8759f00c73 Actually infer args in visitors 2021-07-26 21:15:18 +00:00
Charles Lew
ab171c5279 Add internal attribute and tests. 2021-07-20 22:14:43 +08:00
Santiago Pastorino
e0745e8f5d
Improve impl_trait_in_bindings removed feature text 2021-07-19 09:20:15 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
e8c04b4386
Remove impl_trait_in_bindings feature flag 2021-07-18 09:30:11 -03:00
bors
74ef0c3e40 Auto merge of #87201 - GuillaumeGomez:rollup-4loi2q9, r=GuillaumeGomez
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #87107 (Loop over all opaque types instead of looking at just the first one with the same DefId)
 - #87158 (Suggest full enum variant for local modules)
 - #87174 (Stabilize `[T; N]::map()`)
 - #87179 (Mark `const_trait_impl` as active)
 - #87180 (feat(rustdoc): open sidebar menu when links inside it are focused)
 - #87188 (Add GUI test for auto-hide-trait-implementations setting)
 - #87200 (TAIT: Infer all inference variables in opaque type substitutions via InferCx)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-07-16 19:04:16 +00:00
Jack Huey
f1ab6f93e6 Make GATs no longer incomplete 2021-07-16 00:22:01 -04:00
Deadbeef
8841a426e5
Mark const_trait_impl as active 2021-07-16 11:54:00 +08:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
6c9ea1e8a9 expand: Support helper attributes for built-in derive macros 2021-07-13 21:59:22 +03:00
bors
ca99e3eb3a Auto merge of #86922 - joshtriplett:target-abi, r=oli-obk
target abi

Implement cfg(target_abi) (RFC 2992)

Add an `abi` field to `TargetOptions`, defaulting to "". Support using
`cfg(target_abi = "...")` for conditional compilation on that field.

Gated by `feature(cfg_target_abi)`.

Add a test for `target_abi`, and a test for the feature gate.

Add `target_abi` to tidy as a platform-specific cfg.

Update targets to use `target_abi`

All eabi targets have `target_abi = "eabi".`
All eabihf targets have `target_abi = "eabihf"`.
`armv6_unknown_freebsd` and `armv7_unknown_freebsd` have `target_abi = "eabihf"`.
All abi64 targets have `target_abi = "abi64"`.
All ilp32 targets have `target_abi = "ilp32"`.
All softfloat targets have `target_abi = "softfloat"`.
All *-uwp-windows-* targets have `target_abi = "uwp"`.
All spe targets have `target_abi = "spe"`.
All macabi targets have `target_abi = "macabi"`.
aarch64-apple-ios-sim has `target_abi = "sim"`.
`x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` has `target_abi = "fortanix"`.
`x86_64-unknown-linux-gnux32` has `target_abi = "x32"`.

Add FIXME entries for targets for which existing values need to change
once `cfg_target_abi` becomes stable. (All of them are tier 3 targets.)

Add a test for `target_abi` in `--print cfg`.
2021-07-13 12:25:10 +00:00
bors
394804bb23 Auto merge of #86857 - fee1-dead:add-attr, r=oli-obk
Add #[default_method_body_is_const]

`@rustbot` label F-const_trait_impl
2021-07-13 06:59:34 +00:00
Deadbeef
3660a4e972
Applied suggestions 2021-07-10 20:54:47 +08:00
Deadbeef
2db927d8d8
Add #[default_method_body_is_const] 2021-07-10 20:54:44 +08:00
Ralf Jung
5f0dd6db94 remove const_raw_ptr_to_usize_cast feature 2021-07-10 12:08:58 +02:00
Josh Triplett
84d6e8aed3 Implement cfg(target_abi) (RFC 2992)
Add an `abi` field to `TargetOptions`, defaulting to "". Support using
`cfg(target_abi = "...")` for conditional compilation on that field.

Gated by `feature(cfg_target_abi)`.

Add a test for `target_abi`, and a test for the feature gate.

Add `target_abi` to tidy as a platform-specific cfg.

This does not add an abi to any existing target.
2021-07-07 08:52:35 -07:00
Ryan Levick
7515bcf01a Change linked tracking issue for more qualified paths 2021-07-07 14:56:51 +02:00
Smitty
7a51cf1186 Panic on trying to find non-feature incompleteness 2021-06-28 18:37:54 -04:00
Smitty
11ebd80fe7 Make incomplete features part of delcaration
This prevents mistakes where the feature is in the list of incomplete
features but not actually a feature by making the incompleteness a part
of the declaration.
2021-06-28 14:39:20 -04:00
Smitty
1abb5bc992 Don't make rustc_insignificant_dtor feature gate
This isn't a feature gate, it's an attribute that is feature gated
behind the `rustc_attrs` attribute. Closes #85680.
2021-06-28 13:14:30 -04:00
Ryan Levick
6936349233 Add support for using qualified paths with structs in expression and pattern
position.
2021-06-10 13:18:41 +02:00
bors
f434217aab Auto merge of #79608 - alessandrod:bpf, r=nagisa
BPF target support

This adds `bpfel-unknown-none` and `bpfeb-unknown-none`, two new no_std targets that generate little and big endian BPF. The approach taken is very similar to the cuda target, where `TargetOptions::obj_is_bitcode` is enabled and code generation is done by the linker.

I added the targets to `dist-various-2`. There are [some tests](https://github.com/alessandrod/bpf-linker/tree/main/tests/assembly) in bpf-linker and I'm planning to add more. Those are currently not ran as part of rust CI.
2021-06-06 01:02:32 +00:00
marcusdunn
b908905b3d changeded bindings_after_at from active to accepted 2021-06-04 09:41:55 -07:00
marcusdunn
751ddb7eb2 updated the feature-gate listing 2021-06-04 09:41:55 -07:00
Joshua Nelson
15fec1fb80 Remove doc(include) 2021-06-04 08:05:54 -04:00
bors
153f22a906 Auto merge of #85331 - cjgillot:dirty-dancing, r=Aaron1011
Make rustc_dirty/clean annotations exhaustive by default

Fixes #45009
2021-06-01 23:02:52 +00:00
Alessandro Decina
0adb9331ff BPF: review fixes 2021-05-30 11:57:00 +10:00
Alessandro Decina
9cf2170a79 BPF: fix #[target_feature(enable = "alu32")] 2021-05-29 22:23:32 +10:00
Niko Matsakis
128d385e56 stabilize member constraints 2021-05-26 06:01:53 -04:00
12101111
a90ec5d492
remove native_link_modifiers from the list of incomplete features. 2021-05-24 00:36:55 +08:00
Ralf Jung
65cd051b4a stabilize const_fn_unsize 2021-05-22 10:35:49 +02:00
Jack Huey
3c99dcd82d
Rollup merge of #83366 - jyn514:stabilize-key-value-attrs, r=petrochenkov
Stabilize extended_key_value_attributes

Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44732. Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78835. Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82768 (by making it irrelevant).

 # Stabilization report

 ## Summary

This stabilizes using macro expansion in key-value attributes, like so:

 ```rust
 #[doc = include_str!("my_doc.md")]
 struct S;

 #[path = concat!(env!("OUT_DIR"), "/generated.rs")]
 mod m;
 ```

See Petrochenkov's excellent blog post [on internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/macro-expansion-points-in-attributes/11455)
for alternatives that were considered and rejected ("why accept no more and no less?")

This has been available on nightly since 1.50 with no major issues.

## Notes

### Accepted syntax

The parser accepts arbitrary Rust expressions in this position, but any expression other than a macro invocation will ultimately lead to an error because it is not expected by the built-in expression forms (e.g., `#[doc]`).  Note that decorators and the like may be able to observe other expression forms.

### Expansion ordering

Expansion of macro expressions in "inert" attributes occurs after decorators have executed, analogously to macro expressions appearing in the function body or other parts of decorator input.

There is currently no way for decorators to accept macros in key-value position if macro expansion must be performed before the decorator executes (if the macro can simply be copied into the output for later expansion, that can work).

## Test cases

 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/attributes/key-value-expansion-on-mac.rs
 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/rustdoc/external-doc.rs

The feature has also been dogfooded extensively in the compiler and
standard library:

- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83329
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83230
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82641
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80534

## Implementation history

- Initial proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55414#issuecomment-554005412
- Experiment to see how much code it would break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67121
- Preliminary work to restrict expansion that would conflict with this
feature: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77271
- Initial implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78837
- Fix for an ICE: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80563

## Unresolved Questions

~~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83366#issuecomment-805180738 listed some concerns, but they have been resolved as of this final report.~~

 ## Additional Information

 There are two workarounds that have a similar effect for `#[doc]`
attributes on nightly. One is to emulate this behavior by using a limited version of this feature that was stabilized for historical reasons:

```rust
macro_rules! forward_inner_docs {
    ($e:expr => $i:item) => {
        #[doc = $e]
        $i
    };
}

forward_inner_docs!(include_str!("lib.rs") => struct S {});
```

This also works for other attributes (like `#[path = concat!(...)]`).
The other is to use `doc(include)`:

```rust
 #![feature(external_doc)]
 #[doc(include = "lib.rs")]
 struct S {}
```

The first works, but is non-trivial for people to discover, and
difficult to read and maintain. The second is a strange special-case for
a particular use of the macro. This generalizes it to work for any use
case, not just including files.

I plan to remove `doc(include)` when this is stabilized
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82539). The `forward_inner_docs`
workaround will still compile without warnings, but I expect it to be
used less once it's no longer necessary.
2021-05-18 22:35:54 -04:00
Ralf Jung
aa10380f3b
Rollup merge of #85251 - BoxyUwU:constparamdefaultsany%, r=lcnr
Make `const_generics_defaults` not an incomplete feature

r? `@lcnr`
2021-05-18 19:35:40 +02:00
Joshua Nelson
e48b6b4599 Stabilize extended_key_value_attributes
# Stabilization report

 ## Summary

This stabilizes using macro expansion in key-value attributes, like so:

 ```rust
 #[doc = include_str!("my_doc.md")]
 struct S;

 #[path = concat!(env!("OUT_DIR"), "/generated.rs")]
 mod m;
 ```

See the changes to the reference for details on what macros are allowed;
see Petrochenkov's excellent blog post [on internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/macro-expansion-points-in-attributes/11455)
for alternatives that were considered and rejected ("why accept no more
and no less?")

This has been available on nightly since 1.50 with no major issues.

 ## Notes

 ### Accepted syntax

The parser accepts arbitrary Rust expressions in this position, but any expression other than a macro invocation will ultimately lead to an error because it is not expected by the built-in expression forms (e.g., `#[doc]`).  Note that decorators and the like may be able to observe other expression forms.

 ### Expansion ordering

Expansion of macro expressions in "inert" attributes occurs after decorators have executed, analogously to macro expressions appearing in the function body or other parts of decorator input.

There is currently no way for decorators to accept macros in key-value position if macro expansion must be performed before the decorator executes (if the macro can simply be copied into the output for later expansion, that can work).

 ## Test cases

 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/attributes/key-value-expansion-on-mac.rs
 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/rustdoc/external-doc.rs

The feature has also been dogfooded extensively in the compiler and
standard library:

- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83329
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83230
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82641
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80534

 ## Implementation history

- Initial proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55414#issuecomment-554005412
- Experiment to see how much code it would break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67121
- Preliminary work to restrict expansion that would conflict with this
feature: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77271
- Initial implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78837
- Fix for an ICE: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80563

 ## Unresolved Questions

~~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83366#issuecomment-805180738 listed some concerns, but they have been resolved as of this final report.~~

 ## Additional Information

 There are two workarounds that have a similar effect for `#[doc]`
attributes on nightly. One is to emulate this behavior by using a limited version of this feature that was stabilized for historical reasons:

```rust
macro_rules! forward_inner_docs {
    ($e:expr => $i:item) => {
        #[doc = $e]
        $i
    };
}

forward_inner_docs!(include_str!("lib.rs") => struct S {});
```

This also works for other attributes (like `#[path = concat!(...)]`).
The other is to use `doc(include)`:

```rust
 #![feature(external_doc)]
 #[doc(include = "lib.rs")]
 struct S {}
```

The first works, but is non-trivial for people to discover, and
difficult to read and maintain. The second is a strange special-case for
a particular use of the macro. This generalizes it to work for any use
case, not just including files.

I plan to remove `doc(include)` when this is stabilized. The
`forward_inner_docs` workaround will still compile without warnings, but
I expect it to be used less once it's no longer necessary.
2021-05-18 01:01:36 -04:00
bors
9964284fed Auto merge of #84571 - jedel1043:issue-49804-impl, r=petrochenkov
Parse unnamed fields of struct and union type

Added the `unnamed_fields` feature gate.

This is a prototype of [RFC 2102](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804), so any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

r? `@petrochenkov`
2021-05-17 12:15:26 +00:00
Jonas Schievink
014e8d46f8 Add tracking issue 2021-05-16 21:57:40 +02:00
jedel1043
059b68dd67 Implement Anonymous{Struct, Union} in the AST
Add unnamed_fields feature gate and gate unnamed fields on parsing
2021-05-16 09:49:16 -05:00
Camille GILLOT
fc069d3241 Remove remains of rustc_dirty. 2021-05-16 10:16:31 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
bd16825767 Allow async {} expressions in const contexts 2021-05-16 02:06:40 +02:00
Dhruv Jauhar
a7e1cec621 add new attribute rustc_insignificant_dtor and a query to check if a type has a significant drop 2021-05-14 22:57:33 -04:00
bors
6d395a1c29 Auto merge of #85186 - nikomatsakis:issue-83538-polluted-cache, r=jackh726
have on_completion record subcycles

have on_completion record subcycles

Rework `on_completion` method so that it removes all
provisional cache entries that are "below" a completed
node (while leaving those entries that are not below
the node).

This corrects an imprecise result that could in turn lead
to an incremental compilation failure. Under the old
scheme, if you had:

* A depends on...
   * B depends on A
   * C depends on...
       * D depends on C
 * T: 'static

then the provisional results for A, B, C, and D would all
be entangled. Thus, if A was `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`
(because of that final condition), then the result for C and
D would also be demoted to "ok modulo regions".

In reality, though, the result for C depends only on C and itself,
and is not dependent on regions. If we happen to evaluate the
cycle starting from C, we would never reach A, and hence the
result would be "ok".

Under the new scheme, the provisional results for C and D
are moved to the permanent cache immediately and are not affected
by the result of A.

Fixes #83538

r? `@Aaron1011`
2021-05-13 19:36:46 +00:00
Ellen
7e952ec039 completion uwu 2021-05-13 11:37:32 +01:00