1) Moved 'while' section below 'loop', 'break', and 'continue'; 2) Added information to 'while' and 'for' loops that they interact with 'break' and 'continue' and may have a lifetime label. 3) Clarified labeling syntax on the infinite loops.
skolemize_late_bound_regions essentially copies the entire type (most of the times it shouldn't, but it does), and match_impl runs millions of times.
Times compiling rustc, tested with
$ make -j4 rustc-stage1
$ ( time RUSTFLAGS=-Z time-passes make -j4 rustc-stage2 ) # need LLVM time for calibration
Before:
real 21m44.960s
user 29m38.812s
sys 0m14.944s
After:
real 19m31.445s
user 26m47.260s
sys 0m14.952s
Making this is a 10% performance improvement.
LLVM passes took 867 seconds before, 862 seconds after.
This required fixing the `pretty-rpass-full` tests to have the same `$$(CSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))` dependencies as the `rpass-full` and `cfail-full` tests. It also required fixing the `run-make/simd-ffi` test to use unique names for its output files.
These functions were intended to be introduced as `#[stable]` as a stable API
was deprecated in favor of them, but they just erroneously forgot the stability
attributes.
Combine the two links, [-] and [+], at top-right corner of the page, to use a single and the same one, so that:
- one less link to be created/displayed
- be consistent with other [-]/[+] links in the same page
- people can easily toggle docs without moving their mouse pointer
I also added tooltips/titles to these links.
Instead of rustc-1.0.0-beta-$triple.tar.gz, betas will be named
rustc-beta-$triple.tar.gz. This will give betas a stable download
URL, prevent old artifacts from accumulating in the dist server's
root directory, and not require the website to be updated every
beta.
As a tradeoff, it will be harder to download previous betas because
they will need to be located in the archives.
I'm still unsure about whether this is the right choice.
cc @alexcrichton @steveklabnik
The run-pass and pretty run-pass tests could run concurrently, and if they
do, they need to keep their output segregated.
This change might be overkill. We need the suffix for the `pretty` mode,
but we might not need it otherwise. The `debuginfo-lldb` and
`debuginfo-gdb` modes look like they could also need it, but the current
`tests.mk` file happens not to enable both lldb and gdb at the same time,
for incidental reasons.
The problem is that rustdoc searches for external crates using the host
triple, not the target triple. It's actually unclear to me whether this is
correct behavior or not, but it is necessary to get cross-compiled tests
working.
These tests fail, in general, for cross-compilation, because they require
the rustc crates to exist for the target, and they don't. We can't compile
them for the target unless we also compile LLVM for the target (we don't).
Android is a subset of cross-compilation.
The other fulldeps tests, on the other hand, work fine for
cross-compilation, and in fact, are verifying that rustc correctly searches
for a host plugin crate, not a target plugin crate.
The current code attempts to define the
PRETTY_DEPS$(1)_H_$(3)_pretty-rpass-full variable, which does not work,
because $(1) and $(3) are not inside a function. Moreover, there is a test
(run-pass-fulldeps/compiler-calls.rs) that uses rustc_driver, which is not
an indirect dependency of librustc or libsyntax. Listing all the
dependencies will be hard to maintain, but there's a better way to do
this...
As with the rpass-full and cfail-full tests, add dependencies using the
$$(CSREQ$(1)_T_$(3)_H_$(3)) variable, which includes the complete set of
host and target crates, built for a particular stage and host. We use
T_$(3), not T_$(2), because we only build LLVM for host triples (not
target triples), so we can only build rustc_llvm for host triples. The
fulldeps tests that use plugins need host rustc crates, whereas fulldeps
tests that link against rustc and run should be skipped for
cross-compilation (such as Android).
Fixes#22021
This PR uses the inline error suggestions introduced in #24242 to modify a few existing `help` messages. The new errors look like this:
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:25 error: expected a path on the left-hand side of `+`,
not `&'static Copy` [E0178]
foobar.rs:5 let x: &'static Copy + 'static;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:35 help: try adding parentheses (per RFC 438):
foobar.rs: let x: &'static (Copy + 'static);
foobar.rs:2:13: 2:23 error: cast to unsized type: `&_` as `core::marker::Copy`
foobar.rs:2 let x = &1 as Copy;
^~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:2:19: 2:23 help: try casting to a reference instead:
foobar.rs: let x = &1 as &Copy;
foobar.rs:7:24: 7:25 error: expected expression, found `;`
foobar.rs:7 let x = box (1 + 1);
^
foobar.rs:7:13: 7:16 help: try using `box()` instead:
foobar.rs: let x = box() (1 + 1);
This also modifies compiletest to give the ability to directly test suggestions given by error messages.
1. Use next_back for last.
2. Use slices for computing nth. It might be possible to use the same
code for both the mut/const case but I don't know how that will play
with compiler optimizations.
`ToCStr` was removed with `old_io` and the current method `as_os_str`
is inherent to `Path`, meaning there is no suitable trait bound that
could be used here.
Two more chapters of TRPL. The `type` one is pretty straightforward, but I wasn't really sure what to put for unsized types. I just explained the very basics, and the special bounds syntax. Thoughts on what else should go here?
r? @alexcrichton
