The example code in the Channels subsection of the rust book give warnings about
unused result which must be used, #[warn(unused_must_use)] on by default
Added a small pattern match to resolve those warnings.
This commit is the standard API stabilization commit for the 1.6 release cycle.
The list of issues and APIs below have all been through their cycle-long FCP and
the libs team decisions are listed below
Stabilized APIs
* `Read::read_exact`
* `ErrorKind::UnexpectedEof` (renamed from `UnexpectedEOF`)
* libcore -- this was a bit of a nuanced stabilization, the crate itself is now
marked as `#[stable]` and the methods appearing via traits for primitives like
`char` and `str` are now also marked as stable. Note that the extension traits
themeselves are marked as unstable as they're imported via the prelude. The
`try!` macro was also moved from the standard library into libcore to have the
same interface. Otherwise the functions all have copied stability from the
standard library now.
* `fs::DirBuilder`
* `fs::DirBuilder::new`
* `fs::DirBuilder::recursive`
* `fs::DirBuilder::create`
* `os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt`
* `os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt::mode`
* `vec::Drain`
* `vec::Vec::drain`
* `string::Drain`
* `string::String::drain`
* `vec_deque::Drain`
* `vec_deque::VecDeque::drain`
* `collections::hash_map::Drain`
* `collections::hash_map::HashMap::drain`
* `collections::hash_set::Drain`
* `collections::hash_set::HashSet::drain`
* `collections::binary_heap::Drain`
* `collections::binary_heap::BinaryHeap::drain`
* `Vec::extend_from_slice` (renamed from `push_all`)
* `Mutex::get_mut`
* `Mutex::into_inner`
* `RwLock::get_mut`
* `RwLock::into_inner`
* `Iterator::min_by_key` (renamed from `min_by`)
* `Iterator::max_by_key` (renamed from `max_by`)
Deprecated APIs
* `ErrorKind::UnexpectedEOF` (renamed to `UnexpectedEof`)
* `OsString::from_bytes`
* `OsStr::to_cstring`
* `OsStr::to_bytes`
* `fs::walk_dir` and `fs::WalkDir`
* `path::Components::peek`
* `slice::bytes::MutableByteVector`
* `slice::bytes::copy_memory`
* `Vec::push_all` (renamed to `extend_from_slice`)
* `Duration::span`
* `IpAddr`
* `SocketAddr::ip`
* `Read::tee`
* `io::Tee`
* `Write::broadcast`
* `io::Broadcast`
* `Iterator::min_by` (renamed to `min_by_key`)
* `Iterator::max_by` (renamed to `max_by_key`)
* `net::lookup_addr`
New APIs (still unstable)
* `<[T]>::sort_by_key` (added to mirror `min_by_key`)
Closes#27585Closes#27704Closes#27707Closes#27710Closes#27711Closes#27727Closes#27740Closes#27744Closes#27799Closes#27801
cc #27801 (doesn't close as `Chars` is still unstable)
Closes#28968
This commit is the standard API stabilization commit for the 1.6 release cycle.
The list of issues and APIs below have all been through their cycle-long FCP and
the libs team decisions are listed below
Stabilized APIs
* `Read::read_exact`
* `ErrorKind::UnexpectedEof` (renamed from `UnexpectedEOF`)
* libcore -- this was a bit of a nuanced stabilization, the crate itself is now
marked as `#[stable]` and the methods appearing via traits for primitives like
`char` and `str` are now also marked as stable. Note that the extension traits
themeselves are marked as unstable as they're imported via the prelude. The
`try!` macro was also moved from the standard library into libcore to have the
same interface. Otherwise the functions all have copied stability from the
standard library now.
* The `#![no_std]` attribute
* `fs::DirBuilder`
* `fs::DirBuilder::new`
* `fs::DirBuilder::recursive`
* `fs::DirBuilder::create`
* `os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt`
* `os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt::mode`
* `vec::Drain`
* `vec::Vec::drain`
* `string::Drain`
* `string::String::drain`
* `vec_deque::Drain`
* `vec_deque::VecDeque::drain`
* `collections::hash_map::Drain`
* `collections::hash_map::HashMap::drain`
* `collections::hash_set::Drain`
* `collections::hash_set::HashSet::drain`
* `collections::binary_heap::Drain`
* `collections::binary_heap::BinaryHeap::drain`
* `Vec::extend_from_slice` (renamed from `push_all`)
* `Mutex::get_mut`
* `Mutex::into_inner`
* `RwLock::get_mut`
* `RwLock::into_inner`
* `Iterator::min_by_key` (renamed from `min_by`)
* `Iterator::max_by_key` (renamed from `max_by`)
Deprecated APIs
* `ErrorKind::UnexpectedEOF` (renamed to `UnexpectedEof`)
* `OsString::from_bytes`
* `OsStr::to_cstring`
* `OsStr::to_bytes`
* `fs::walk_dir` and `fs::WalkDir`
* `path::Components::peek`
* `slice::bytes::MutableByteVector`
* `slice::bytes::copy_memory`
* `Vec::push_all` (renamed to `extend_from_slice`)
* `Duration::span`
* `IpAddr`
* `SocketAddr::ip`
* `Read::tee`
* `io::Tee`
* `Write::broadcast`
* `io::Broadcast`
* `Iterator::min_by` (renamed to `min_by_key`)
* `Iterator::max_by` (renamed to `max_by_key`)
* `net::lookup_addr`
New APIs (still unstable)
* `<[T]>::sort_by_key` (added to mirror `min_by_key`)
Closes#27585Closes#27704Closes#27707Closes#27710Closes#27711Closes#27727Closes#27740Closes#27744Closes#27799Closes#27801
cc #27801 (doesn't close as `Chars` is still unstable)
Closes#28968
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/16 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701
- Added syntax support for attributes on expressions and all syntax nodes in statement position.
- Extended `#[cfg]` folder to allow removal of statements, and
of expressions in optional positions like expression lists and trailing
block expressions.
- Extended lint checker to recognize lint levels on expressions and
locals.
- As per RFC, attributes are not yet accepted on `if` expressions.
Examples:
```rust
let x = y;
{
...
}
assert_eq!((1, #[cfg(unset)] 2, 3), (1, 3));
let FOO = 0;
```
Implementation wise, there are a few rough corners and open questions:
- The parser work ended up a bit ugly.
- The pretty printer change was based mostly on guessing.
- Similar to the `if` case, there are some places in the grammar where a new `Expr` node starts,
but where it seemed weird to accept attributes and hence the parser doesn't. This includes:
- const expressions in patterns
- in the middle of an postfix operator chain (that is, after `.`, before indexing, before calls)
- on range expressions, since `#[attr] x .. y` parses as `(#[attr] x) .. y`, which is inconsistent with
`#[attr] .. y` which would parse as `#[attr] (.. y)`
- Attributes are added as additional `Option<Box<Vec<Attribute>>>` fields in expressions and locals.
- Memory impact has not been measured yet.
- A cfg-away trailing expression in a block does not currently promote the previous `StmtExpr` in a block to a new trailing expr. That is to say, this won't work:
```rust
let x = {
#[cfg(foo)]
Foo { data: x }
#[cfg(not(foo))]
Foo { data: y }
};
```
- One-element tuples can have their inner expression removed to become Unit, but just Parenthesis can't. Eg, `(#[cfg(unset)] x,) == ()` but `(#[cfg(unset)] x) == error`. This seemed reasonable to me since tuples and unit are type constructors, but could probably be argued either way.
- Attributes on macro nodes are currently unconditionally dropped during macro expansion, which seemed fine since macro disappear at that point?
- Attributes on `ast::ExprParens` will be prepend-ed to the inner expression in the hir folder.
- The work on pretty printer tests for this did trigger, but not fix errors regarding macros:
- expression `foo![]` prints as `foo!()`
- expression `foo!{}` prints as `foo!()`
- statement `foo![];` prints as `foo!();`
- statement `foo!{};` prints as `foo!();`
- statement `foo!{}` triggers a `None` unwrap ICE.
Replace the old link pointing to an out-of-date gist with a
link to the lazy_static crate on crates.io.
We also don't need to state the author, as the crates.io page
shows the authors and owners.
I think this fixes#30137. I basically just repeated some details that were scattered around other places in this document, and emphasized that you probably don't want an `extern crate` or `mod` statement to end up inside a function.
The documentation shows this:
[dependencies]
rand="0.3.0"
and says it allows any version compatible with 0.3.0, but then it says, "If we wanted to use only 0.3.0 exactly, we could use `=0.3.0`." That is very easy to misunderstand, so hopefully this PR will help others not to be as confused as me. :-)
I think this fixes#30137. I basically just repeated some details that were scattered around other places in this document, and emphasized that you probably don't want an `extern crate` or `mod` statement to end up inside a function.
* `const`: Add reference to raw pointers
* Change `expr!(...)` etc. examples to use `ident` instead.
*Technically*, it should be `pat`, but that's not how it works in
practice.
* `|`: add reference to closure syntax.
* Closure syntax entry.
* Indexing and slicing entries.
The `f` argument will reference the actual value in the `d` box, not the box in the `bar`'s stack frame.
I am just learning Rust, so I don't know how to explain this well, but just from `f`'s type it is clear that it will be a pointer to an `i32`, not a pointer to a pointer. Some `println!("{:p}", ...)`'s can easily confirm this.
I would actually suggest to remove/simplify this part of the example. This is a subtle issue that can easily confuse people at the early stages of familiarizing with the language. (As I got confused by it. :))
At this point of the book, reader have likely use `cargo new --bin`,
likely 2 times, once if they are lazy. This remind them of the `cargo`
syntax.
I was myself unsure whether it was `cargo create`, `cargo new`, and
whether it would initialize in current working directory or needed a
target.
--
Otherwise thanks, I've been writing rust for a few hours, and likes it so far.
At this point of the book, reader have likely use `cargo new --bin`,
likely 2 times, once if they are lazy. This remind them of the `cargo`
syntax.
I was myself unsure whether it was `cargo create`, `cargo new`, and
whether it would initialize in current working directory or needed a
target.
The book was located under 'src/doc/trpl' because originally, it was
going to be hosted under that URL. Late in the game, before 1.0, we
decided that /book was a better one, so we changed the output, but
not the input. This causes confusion for no good reason. So we'll change
the source directory to look like the output directory, like for every
other thing in src/doc.
Fixes#29853Fixes#29852
While these points are true, we're not going for 100% accuracy here,
this is introductory material. Changing these things would be more
confusing, but it is important to note that we're presenting an
abstraction here.
r? @huonw
I noticed the nomicon was not listed!
I also removed links to racer and rustfmt since they were not *doc-specific* links, just links to tools, as well as pointed the cargo link directly at the docs.
Removed all the community stuff. There are lots of other places to find this now, including the website.
With pending website changes this page will continue to be pared back, reflecting only what's in-tree, not general Rust docs.
r? @steveklabnik
Fixes#29853Fixes#29852
While these points are true, we're not going for 100% accuracy here,
this is introductory material. Changing these things would be more
confusing, but it is important to note that we're presenting an
abstraction here.
- Check privacy sanity in all blocks, not only function bodies
- Check all fields, not only named
- Check all impl items, not only methods
- Check default impls
- Move the sanity check in the beginning of privacy checking, so others could rely on it
Technically it's a [breaking-change], but I expect no breakage because, well, it's *sane* privacy visitor, if code is broken it must be insane by definition!
The struct_variant feature was accepted and is no longer feature gated.
See #19122, #19124
§6.1.6 Enumerations shows an example of a struct-like enum variant.
In src/doc/trpl/error-handling.md, in this section:
It mentions three steps, to "convert this to proper error handling", the last one being:
3. Handle the error in main.
However, it is not shown. This pull request adds a code example showing how `main`'s call to `search` should use case analysis. I am still very much new to learning Rust, so this may not be idiomatic. Happy to make changes with guidance.
The struct_variant feature was accepted and is no longer feature gated.
See #19122, #19124
§6.1.6 Enumerations shows an example of a struct-like enum variant.
Originally, this was my 30 minute introduction, and we eventually made
it the opener to the book. But as #25918 has shown, the example I use
here has some issues. The good news is that Rust makes heap allocation
syntatically expensive, but the bad news is that that means showing
equivalent programs from Rust and other languages is difficult. After
thinking about it, I'm not sure this section is pulling its weight, and
since it has problems, I'd rather just pull it than try to re-write it
right now. I think the book is fine without it.
FIxes#25918
Originally, this was my 30 minute introduction, and we eventually made
it the opener to the book. But as #25918 has shown, the example I use
here has some issues. The good news is that Rust makes heap allocation
syntatically expensive, but the bad news is that that means showing
equivalent programs from Rust and other languages is difficult. After
thinking about it, I'm not sure this section is pulling its weight, and
since it has problems, I'd rather just pull it than try to re-write it
right now. I think the book is fine without it.
FIxes#25918
Reword "Writing the logic" paragraph to prevent `unwrap` being confused for a macro (and other small changes to improve the flow of the paragraph).
cc @steveklabnik
I did some preliminary editing work with No Starch on the first chapter of the book, and here's some of the results. We're going to want to return to this later when @brson etc's new rustup work is done, so this is mostly just a first pass.
But, we agreed that having separate chapters for each of this bit of intro is a bit excessive. So let's move all of this intro stuff into one chapter.
I'd appreciate a careful review of this, as there was also some confusion about some things, which resulted in me taking one huge markdown file apart and splitting it back up, as well as some editor issues, so I _think_ this looks good, but double checking things matters!
/cc @aturon
I read this section a few times before even having a guess what
was meant, then consulted IRC for confirmation. It may be that I
was thick-headed, but I think this is a useful addition.
I read this section a few times before even having a guess what
was meant, then consulted IRC for confirmation. It may be that I
was thick-headed, but I think this is a useful addition.
