Paper over privacy issues with Deref by changing field names.
Types that implement Deref can cause weird error messages due to their
private fields conflicting with a field of the type they deref to, e.g.,
previously
struct Foo { x: int }
let a: Arc<Foo> = ...;
println!("{}", a.x);
would complain the the `x` field of `Arc` was private (since Arc has a
private field called `x`) rather than just ignoring it.
This patch doesn't fix that issue, but does mean one would have to write
`a._ptr` to hit the same error message, which seems far less
common. (This patch `_`-prefixes all private fields of
`Deref`-implementing types.)
cc #12808
Types that implement Deref can cause weird error messages due to their
private fields conflicting with a field of the type they deref to, e.g.,
previously
struct Foo { x: int }
let a: Arc<Foo> = ...;
println!("{}", a.x);
would complain the the `x` field of `Arc` was private (since Arc has a
private field called `x`) rather than just ignoring it.
This patch doesn't fix that issue, but does mean one would have to write
`a._ptr` to hit the same error message, which seems far less
common. (This patch `_`-prefixes all private fields of
`Deref`-implementing types.)
cc #12808
The span on a inner doc-comment would point to the next token, e.g. the span for the `a` line points to the `b` line, and the span of `b` points to the `fn`.
```rust
//! a
//! b
fn bar() {}
```
This mostly involved frobbing imports between realstd, realcore, and the core
being test. Some of the imports are a little counterintuitive, but it mainly
focuses around libcore's types not implementing Show while libstd's types
implement Show.
fail!() used to require owned strings but can handle static strings
now. Also, it can pass its arguments to fmt!() on its own, no need for
the caller to call fmt!() itself.
Also fixed the docstring on `TC_ONCE_CLOSURE` (was accidentally the same as `TC_MUTABLE`) and shifted the `TC_EMPTY_ENUM` bit left by one since whatever previously used that bit has been removed.
Closes#3083.
This takes a similar approach to #5797 where a set is present on the `tcx` of used mutable definitions. Everything is by default warned about, and analyses must explicitly add mutable definitions to this set so they're not warned about.
Most of this was pretty straightforward, although there was one caveat that I ran into when implementing it. Apparently when the old modes are used (or maybe `legacy_modes`, I'm not sure) some different code paths are taken to cause spurious warnings to be issued which shouldn't be issued. I'm not really sure how modes even worked, so I was having a lot of trouble tracking this down. I figured that because they're a legacy thing that I'd just de-mode the compiler so that the warnings wouldn't be a problem anymore (or at least for the compiler).
Other than that, the entire compiler compiles without warnings of unused mutable variables. To prevent bad warnings, #5965 should be landed (which in turn is waiting on #5963) before landing this. I figured I'd stick it out for review anyway though.
use core::cell;
fn main() {
let x = cell::Cell(Some(~"foo"));
let y = x.value.get_ref().get_ref();
do x.with_mut_ref |z| { *z = None; }
println(*y) // boom!
}
For bootstrapping purposes, this commit does not remove all uses of
the keyword "pure" -- doing so would cause the compiler to no longer
bootstrap due to some syntax extensions ("deriving" in particular).
Instead, it makes the compiler ignore "pure". Post-snapshot, we can
remove "pure" from the language.
There are quite a few (~100) borrow check errors that were essentially
all the result of mutable fields or partial borrows of `@mut`. Per
discussions with Niko I think we want to allow partial borrows of
`@mut` but detect obvious footguns. We should also improve the error
message when `@mut` is erroneously reborrowed.
