Rename two lints to comply with our lint naming convention
self_named_constructor -> self_named_constructors
append_instead_of_extend -> extend_with_drain
We don't need to `register_renamed` those lints, since I'll backport them to beta, so the old names won't hit stable.
changelog: none
(I'll adapt the changelog before merging #7498)
Add #[track_caller] for some function in core::mem.
These functions can panic for some types. This makes the panic point to the code that calls e.g. mem::uninitialized(), instead of inside the definition of mem::uninitialized.
Make const panic!("..") work in Rust 2021.
During const eval, this replaces calls to core::panicking::panic_fmt and std::panicking::being_panic_fmt with a call to a new const fn: core::panicking::const_panic_fmt. That function uses fmt::Arguments::as_str() to get the str and calls panic_str with that instead.
panic!() invocations with formatting arguments are still not accepted, as the creation of such a fmt::Arguments cannot be done in constant functions right now.
r? `@RalfJung`
Create `QuerySideEffects` and use it for diagnostics
The code for saving and loading diagnostics during execution is generalized to handle a new `QuerySideEffects` struct. Currently, this struct just holds diagnostics - in a follow-up PR, I plan to add support for storing attriutes marked as used during query execution.
This is a pure refactor, with no intended behavior changes.
Remove unsound TrustedRandomAccess implementations
Removes the implementations that depend on the user-definable trait `Copy`.
Fixes#85873 in the most straightforward way.
<hr>
_Edit:_ This PR now contains additional trait infrastructure to avoid performance regressions around in-place collect, see the discussion in this thread starting from the codegen test failure at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85874#issuecomment-872327577.
With this PR, `TrustedRandomAccess` gains additional documentation that specifically allows for and specifies the safety conditions around subtype coercions – those coercions can happen in safe Rust code with the `Zip` API’s usage of `TrustedRandomAccess`. This PR introduces a new supertrait of `TrustedRandomAccess`(currently named `TrustedRandomAccessNoCoerce`) that _doesn’t allow_ such coercions, which means it can be still be useful for optimizing cases such as in-place collect where no iterator is handed out to a user (who could do coercions) after a `get_unchecked` call; the benefit of the supertrait is that it doesn’t come with the additional safety conditions around supertraits either, so it can be implemented for more types than `TrustedRandomAccess`.
The `TrustedRandomAccess` implementations for `vec::IntoIter`, `vec_deque::IntoIter`, and `array::IntoIter` are removed as they don’t conform with the newly documented safety conditions, this way unsoundness is removed. But this PR in turn (re-)adds a `TrustedRandomAccessNoCoerce` implementation for `vec::IntoIter` to avoid performance regressions from stable in a case of in-place collecting of `Vec`s [the above-mentioned codegen test failure]. Re-introducing the (currently nightly+beta-only) impls for `VecDeque`’s and `[T; N]`’s iterators is technically possible, but goes beyond the scope of this PR (i.e. it can happen in a future PR).
The examples added in #60396 used a "clever" post-increment hack,
unrelated to the actual point of the examples. That hack was found
[confusing] in the users forum, and #81811 already changed the `Vec`
example to use a more direct iterator. This commit changes `String` and
`VecDeque` in the same way for consistency.
[confusing]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/help-understand-strange-expression/62858
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #81050 (Stabilize core::task::ready!)
- #81363 (Remove P: Unpin bound on impl Future for Pin)
- #86839 (Add doc aliases to fs.rs)
- #87435 (fix example code for E0617)
- #87451 (Add support for tuple struct field documentation)
- #87491 (Integrate context into the memorial to Anna)
- #87521 (Add long explanation for E0498)
- #87527 (Don't run MIR unsafeck at all when using `-Zthir-unsafeck`)
- #87550 (Add `CI_ONLY_WHEN_CHANNEL` and run `x86_64-gnu-stable` only on nightly)
- #87565 (Use backticks when referring to `core::future::Ready` in panic message)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Integrate context into the memorial to Anna
This came up after I reviewed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87298, but I didn't propose this in time before that PR was merged.
If y'all feel this is too much churn on the file, no worries, feel free to close, but I felt this was a more fitting integration of the memorial into the test suite.
CC ``@boringcactus.``
Add support for tuple struct field documentation
Fixes #42615.
This is #80320 updated to new codebase and with added tests.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83255.
cc ```@camelid``` (since you were involved on the original PR).
r? ```@jyn514```
Remove P: Unpin bound on impl Future for Pin
We can safely produce a `Pin<&mut P::Target>` without moving out of the `Pin` by using `Pin::as_mut` directly.
The `Unpin` bound was originally added in #56939 following the recommendation of ``@withoutboats`` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55766#issue-378417538
That comment does not give explicit justification for why the bound should be added. The relevant context was:
> [ ] Remove `impl<P> Unpin for Pin<P>`
>
> This impl is not justified by our standard justification for unpin impls: there is no pointer direction between `Pin<P>` and `P`. Its usefulness is covered by the impls for pointers themselves.
>
> This futures impl (link to the impl changed in this PR) will need to change to add a `P: Unpin` bound.
The decision to remove the unconditional impl of `Unpin for Pin` is sound (these days there is just an auto-impl for when `P: Unpin`). But, I think the decision to also add the `Unpin` bound for `impl Future` may have been unnecessary. Or if that's not the case, I'd be very interested to have the argument for why written down somewhere. The bound _appears_ to not be needed, as demonstrated by the change requiring no unsafe code and by the existence of `Pin::as_mut`.
Stabilize core::task::ready!
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70922_
This PR stabilizes the `task::ready!` macro. Similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80886, this PR was waiting on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74355 to be fixed.
The `task::ready!` API has existed in the futures ecosystem for several years, and was added on nightly last year in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70817. The motivation for this macro is the same as it was back then: virtually every single manual future implementation makes use of this; so much so that it's one of the few things included in the [futures-core](https://docs.rs/futures-core/0.3.12/futures_core) library.
r? ``@tmandry``
cc/ ``@rust-lang/wg-async-foundations`` ``@rust-lang/libs``
## Example
```rust
use core::task::{Context, Poll};
use core::future::Future;
use core::pin::Pin;
async fn get_num() -> usize {
42
}
pub fn do_poll(cx: &mut Context<'_>) -> Poll<()> {
let mut f = get_num();
let f = unsafe { Pin::new_unchecked(&mut f) };
let num = ready!(f.poll(cx));
// ... use num
Poll::Ready(())
}
```
During const eval, this replaces calls to core::panicking::panic_fmt and
std::panicking::being_panic_fmt with a call to a new const fn:
core::panicking::const_panic_fmt. That function uses
fmt::Arguments::as_str() to get the str and calls panic_str with that
instead.
panic!() invocations with formatting arguments are still not accepted,
as the creation of such a fmt::Arguments cannot be done in constant
functions right now.
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #7279 (Adapting the lint list to Clippy's new metadata format)
- #7298 (Switch CI to new metadata collection)
- #7420 (Update lint documentation to use markdown headlines)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
changelog: rollup
Update lint documentation to use markdown headlines
This PR updates all lint documentation to use markdown headlines. It additionally removed the *Known problems* section for lints without any problems. I've double-checked all automatic replacements, but a second pair of eyes is definitely appreciated!
I wasn't sure when you wanted to switch to the new metadata collection tomorrow, I therefore prepared this PR today. And that's it this is a standalone PR to keep the other related PRs reviewable.
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995`
cc: #7172
Note: This should be merged with the other metadata collection related PRs.
Switch CI to new metadata collection
r? `@xFrednet`
Things we have to keep in mind:
- This removes the template files and the scripts used for deployment from the checkout. This was added in #5517. I don't think we ever needed those there. Not sure though.
- ~~As a result, we can't remove the python scripts yet. We have to wait until this hits a stable Clippy release.~~ I'll just break the next stable deploy and do it by hand once.
- This should be merged together with #7279. Me and `@xFrednet` will coordinate the switch
- ...?
I still have to try out some things:
- [x] Is it worth caching? Yes
- [x] ~~Is it worth to do a release build?~~ Nope
- [x] Does it actually work? With a few changes, yes
- [ ] ...?
changelog: Clippy now uses a lint to generate its documentation 🎉
