fn is_useful , more skeletons
Specify a lifetime on pattern references
impl PatStack
fill impl Matrix
PatStack::pop_head_constructor
Index-based approach
struct PatCtxt
fields construction fn Fields::wildcards
split wildcard
fn Constructor::is_covered_by_any(..)
fn Matrix::specialize_constructor(..)
impl Usefulness
Initial work on witness construction
Reorganize files
Replace match checking diagnostic
Handle types of expanded patterns
unit match checking go brrr
8952: add support of impl block for doctest into runnables r=matklad a=bnjjj
close#6356
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
8866: Update salsa r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This updates salsa to include https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/265, and removes all cancellation-related code from rust-analyzer
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9060: feat: Diagnose unimplemented built-in macros r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
A number of built-in attribute macros are unsupported, I thought it might be useful to put a diagnostic on their definition in libcore. Not sure.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9051: Fix incorrect setting descriptions r=lnicola a=sclu1034
Descriptions for diagnostic warning hint and info display were swapped.
Fixes#8485.
Co-authored-by: Lucas Schwiderski <lucas@lschwiderski.de>
9027: feat: Attribute completion is context aware r=Veykril a=Veykril
This splits off the `lint` and `derive` completions into their own submodules of `attribute`.
The idea is to create a lazy global hashmap that maps `SyntaxKind` to attribute names(`&[&str]`) in which we index with the syntax kind of the "thing" we are attributing giving us the attributes back that are valid for this kind. Then we use this name to do a binary search on the attribute list to fetch and build the corresponding completion item.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
9040: Don't label derive macros with their banged_name r=Veykril a=Veykril
cc https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7072#issuecomment-850396203
This doesn't fix it non builtin derives yet I think cause of a FIXME somewhere that doesn't categorize proc-macro derives as derives yet
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
