Commit Graph

201 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Crichton
f4a775639c rollup merge of #19298: nikomatsakis/unboxed-closure-parse-the-plus
Implements RFC 438.

Fixes #19092.

This is a [breaking-change]: change types like `&Foo+Send` or `&'a mut Foo+'a` to `&(Foo+Send)` and `&'a mut (Foo+'a)`, respectively.

r? @brson
2014-11-26 16:49:46 -08:00
Niko Matsakis
f4e29e7e9a Fixup various places that were doing &T+'a and do &(T+'a) 2014-11-26 11:42:06 -05:00
Aaron Turon
b299c2b57d Fallout from stabilization 2014-11-25 17:41:54 -08:00
bors
f6cb58caee auto merge of #19149 : alexcrichton/rust/issue-19091, r=aturon
This change applies the conventions to unwrap listed in [RFC 430][rfc] to rename
non-failing `unwrap` methods to `into_inner`. This is a breaking change, but all
`unwrap` methods are retained as `#[deprecated]` for the near future. To update
code rename `unwrap` method calls to `into_inner`.

[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/430
[breaking-change]

cc #19091
2014-11-25 09:21:45 +00:00
Alex Crichton
a9c1152c4b std: Add a new top-level thread_local module
This commit removes the `std::local_data` module in favor of a new
`std::thread_local` module providing thread local storage. The module provides
two variants of TLS: one which owns its contents and one which is based on
scoped references. Each implementation has pros and cons listed in the
documentation.

Both flavors have accessors through a function called `with` which yield a
reference to a closure provided. Both flavors also panic if a reference cannot
be yielded and provide a function to test whether an access would panic or not.
This is an implementation of [RFC 461][rfc] and full details can be found in
that RFC.

This is a breaking change due to the removal of the `std::local_data` module.
All users can migrate to the new thread local system like so:

    thread_local!(static FOO: Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>> = Rc::new(RefCell::new(None)))

The old `local_data` module inherently contained the `Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>>` as
an implementation detail which must now be explicitly stated by users.

[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/461
[breaking-change]
2014-11-23 23:37:16 -08:00
Alex Crichton
f1f6c1286f Rename unwrap functions to into_inner
This change applies the conventions to unwrap listed in [RFC 430][rfc] to rename
non-failing `unwrap` methods to `into_inner`. This is a breaking change, but all
`unwrap` methods are retained as `#[deprecated]` for the near future. To update
code rename `unwrap` method calls to `into_inner`.

[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/430
[breaking-change]

Closes #13159
cc #19091
2014-11-23 15:26:53 -08:00
bors
641e2a110d auto merge of #19152 : alexcrichton/rust/issue-17863, r=aturon
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 240][rfc] when applied to the standard
library. It primarily deprecates the entirety of `string::raw`, `vec::raw`,
`slice::raw`, and `str::raw` in favor of associated functions, methods, and
other free functions. The detailed renaming is:

* slice::raw::buf_as_slice => slice::from_raw_buf
* slice::raw::mut_buf_as_slice => slice::from_raw_mut_buf
* slice::shift_ptr => deprecated with no replacement
* slice::pop_ptr => deprecated with no replacement
* str::raw::from_utf8 => str::from_utf8_unchecked
* str::raw::c_str_to_static_slice => str::from_c_str
* str::raw::slice_bytes => deprecated for slice_unchecked (slight semantic diff)
* str::raw::slice_unchecked => str.slice_unchecked
* string::raw::from_parts => String::from_raw_parts
* string::raw::from_buf_len => String::from_raw_buf_len
* string::raw::from_buf => String::from_raw_buf
* string::raw::from_utf8 => String::from_utf8_unchecked
* vec::raw::from_buf => Vec::from_raw_buf

All previous functions exist in their `#[deprecated]` form, and the deprecation
messages indicate how to migrate to the newer variants.

[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0240-unsafe-api-location.md
[breaking-change]

Closes #17863
2014-11-23 05:46:52 +00:00
Alex Crichton
8ca27a633e std: Align raw modules with unsafe conventions
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 240][rfc] when applied to the standard
library. It primarily deprecates the entirety of `string::raw`, `vec::raw`,
`slice::raw`, and `str::raw` in favor of associated functions, methods, and
other free functions. The detailed renaming is:

* slice::raw::buf_as_slice => slice::with_raw_buf
* slice::raw::mut_buf_as_slice => slice::with_raw_mut_buf
* slice::shift_ptr => deprecated with no replacement
* slice::pop_ptr => deprecated with no replacement
* str::raw::from_utf8 => str::from_utf8_unchecked
* str::raw::c_str_to_static_slice => str::from_c_str
* str::raw::slice_bytes => deprecated for slice_unchecked (slight semantic diff)
* str::raw::slice_unchecked => str.slice_unchecked
* string::raw::from_parts => String::from_raw_parts
* string::raw::from_buf_len => String::from_raw_buf_len
* string::raw::from_buf => String::from_raw_buf
* string::raw::from_utf8 => String::from_utf8_unchecked
* vec::raw::from_buf => Vec::from_raw_buf

All previous functions exist in their `#[deprecated]` form, and the deprecation
messages indicate how to migrate to the newer variants.

[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0240-unsafe-api-location.md
[breaking-change]

Closes #17863
2014-11-22 09:36:56 -08:00
Aaron Turon
b3d4379042 Fallout from new termination semantics 2014-11-20 17:19:24 -08:00
Aaron Turon
6987ad22e4 Make most of std::rt private
Previously, the entire runtime API surface was publicly exposed, but
that is neither necessary nor desirable. This commit hides most of the
module, using librustrt directly as needed. The arrangement will need to
be revisited when rustrt is pulled into std.

[breaking-change]
2014-11-20 17:19:24 -08:00
Aaron Turon
40c78ab037 Fallout from libgreen and libnative removal 2014-11-20 17:19:24 -08:00
Aaron Turon
ad022b1a1b Remove Runtime trait
This commit removes most of the remaining runtime infrastructure related
to the green/native split. In particular, it removes the `Runtime` trait
and instead inlines the native implementation.

Closes #17325

[breaking-change]
2014-11-20 17:19:13 -08:00
jxv
33f8a82c02 librustrt: check for mips+linux config in stack_overflow 2014-11-18 09:24:11 -08:00
Steven Fackler
3dcd215740 Switch to purely namespaced enums
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as
their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to
refer to the new locations:

```
pub enum Foo {
    A,
    B
}

fn main() {
    let a = A;
}
```
=>
```
pub use self::Foo::{A, B};

pub enum Foo {
    A,
    B
}

fn main() {
    let a = A;
}
```
or
```
pub enum Foo {
    A,
    B
}

fn main() {
    let a = Foo::A;
}
```

[breaking-change]
2014-11-17 07:35:51 -08:00
Nick Cameron
ca08540a00 Fix fallout from coercion removal 2014-11-17 22:41:33 +13:00
bors
1e4e55aebc auto merge of #18880 : barosl/rust/doc-fail-to-panic, r=alexcrichton
I found some occurrences of "failure" and "fails" in the documentation. I changed them to "panics" if it means a task panic. Otherwise I left it as is, or changed it to "errors" to clearly distinguish them.

Also, I made a minor fix that is breaking the layout of a module page. "Example" is shown in an irrelevant place from the following page: http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/index.html
2014-11-14 18:17:28 +00:00
Alex Crichton
065e39bb2f Register new snapshots 2014-11-12 12:17:55 -08:00
Barosl Lee
8bf77fa786 Fix remaining documentation to reflect fail!() -> panic!()
Throughout the docs, "failure" was replaced with "panics" if it means a
task panic. Otherwise, it remained as is, or changed to "errors" to
clearly differentiate it from a task panic.
2014-11-12 03:36:09 +09:00
Aaron Turon
fa94fdad3e Runtime removal: fully remove rtio
This patch cleans up the remnants of the runtime IO interface.

Because this eliminates APIs in `libnative` and `librustrt`, it is a:

[breaking-change]

This functionality is likely to be available publicly, in some form,
from `std` in the future.
2014-11-08 20:40:39 -08:00
Aaron Turon
0f98e75b69 Runtime removal: refactor process
This patch continues the runtime removal by moving and refactoring the
process implementation into the new `sys` module.

Because this eliminates APIs in `libnative` and `librustrt`, it is a:

[breaking-change]

This functionality is likely to be available publicly, in some form,
from `std` in the future.
2014-11-08 20:40:39 -08:00
Aaron Turon
d34b1b0ca9 Runtime removal: refactor pipes and networking
This patch continues the runtime removal by moving pipe and
networking-related code into `sys`.

Because this eliminates APIs in `libnative` and `librustrt`, it is a:

[breaking-change]

This functionality is likely to be available publicly, in some form,
from `std` in the future.
2014-11-08 20:40:38 -08:00
Aaron Turon
0c1e1ff1e3 Runtime removal: refactor fs
This moves the filesystem implementation from libnative into the new
`sys` modules, refactoring along the way and hooking into `std::io::fs`.

Because this eliminates APIs in `libnative` and `librustrt`, it is a:

[breaking-change]

This functionality is likely to be available publicly, in some form,
from `std` in the future.
2014-11-08 20:40:38 -08:00
Aaron Turon
16470cf01b Remove signal handling.
Since signal handling was only implemented through librustuv, which is
now gone, there's no reason to even provide the API.

[breaking-change]
2014-11-08 20:40:38 -08:00
Alex Crichton
8a25e071e8 rollup merge of #18605 : Gankro/collect-fruit 2014-11-06 13:29:31 -08:00
Alexis Beingessner
eec145be3f Fallout from collection conventions 2014-11-06 12:26:08 -05:00
Aaron Turon
cfafc1b737 Prelude: rename and consolidate extension traits
This commit renames a number of extension traits for slices and string
slices, now that they have been refactored for DST. In many cases,
multiple extension traits could now be consolidated. Further
consolidation will be possible with generalized where clauses.

The renamings are consistent with the [new `-Prelude`
suffix](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/344). There are probably
a few more candidates for being renamed this way, but that is left for
API stabilization of the relevant modules.

Because this renames traits, it is a:

[breaking-change]

However, I do not expect any code that currently uses the standard
library to actually break.

Closes #17917
2014-11-06 08:03:18 -08:00
Jorge Aparicio
1e5f311d16 Fix fallout of DSTifying PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord 2014-11-05 20:12:14 -05:00
Eduard Burtescu
56dbf3d122 Register snapshots. 2014-11-05 12:55:58 +02:00
Alexis Beingessner
112c8a966f refactor libcollections as part of collection reform
* Moves multi-collection files into their own directory, and splits them into seperate files
* Changes exports so that each collection has its own module
* Adds underscores to public modules and filenames to match standard naming conventions

(that is, treemap::{TreeMap, TreeSet} => tree_map::TreeMap, tree_set::TreeSet)

* Renames PriorityQueue to BinaryHeap
* Renames SmallIntMap to VecMap
* Miscellanious fallout fixes

[breaking-change]
2014-11-02 18:58:11 -05:00
Daniel Micay
fea985a0b5 bubble up out-of-memory errors from liballoc
This makes the low-level allocation API suitable for use cases where
out-of-memory conditions need to be handled.

Closes #18292

[breaking-change]
2014-11-01 19:23:20 -04:00
bors
39f90aead4 auto merge of #18474 : alexcrichton/rust/no-more-traits, r=aturon
As part of the collections reform RFC, this commit removes all collections
traits in favor of inherent methods on collections themselves. All methods
should continue to be available on all collections.

This is a breaking change with all of the collections traits being removed and
no longer being in the prelude. In order to update old code you should move the
trait implementations to inherent implementations directly on the type itself.

Note that some traits had default methods which will also need to be implemented
to maintain backwards compatibility.

[breaking-change]
cc #18424
2014-11-01 20:21:47 +00:00
Alex Crichton
21ac985af4 collections: Remove all collections traits
As part of the collections reform RFC, this commit removes all collections
traits in favor of inherent methods on collections themselves. All methods
should continue to be available on all collections.

This is a breaking change with all of the collections traits being removed and
no longer being in the prelude. In order to update old code you should move the
trait implementations to inherent implementations directly on the type itself.

Note that some traits had default methods which will also need to be implemented
to maintain backwards compatibility.

[breaking-change]
cc #18424
2014-11-01 11:37:04 -07:00
Jorge Aparicio
dd9dda7a1c DSTify ToCStr 2014-10-31 10:09:15 -05:00
Alex Crichton
00975e041d rollup merge of #18398 : aturon/lint-conventions-2
Conflicts:
	src/libcollections/slice.rs
	src/libcore/failure.rs
	src/libsyntax/parse/token.rs
	src/test/debuginfo/basic-types-mut-globals.rs
	src/test/debuginfo/simple-struct.rs
	src/test/debuginfo/trait-pointers.rs
2014-10-30 17:37:22 -07:00
Manish Goregaokar
13d19bbf10 Rename rust_fail to rust_panic 2014-10-30 05:09:50 +05:30
Steve Klabnik
6ac7fc73f5 Update infrastructure for fail -> panic
This includes updating the language items and marking what needs to
change after a snapshot.

If you do not use the standard library, the language items you need to
implement have changed. For example:

```rust
 #[lang = "fail_fmt"] fn fail_fmt() -> ! { loop {} }
```

is now

```rust
 #[lang = "panic_fmt"] fn panic_fmt() -> ! { loop {} }
```

Related, lesser-implemented language items `fail` and
`fail_bounds_check` have become `panic` and `panic_bounds_check`, as
well. These are implemented by `libcore`, so it is unlikely (though
possible!) that these two renamings will affect you.

[breaking-change]

Fix test suite
2014-10-29 16:06:13 -04:00
Steve Klabnik
7828c3dd28 Rename fail! to panic!
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221

The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.

Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.

We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.

To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:

    grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'

You can of course also do this by hand.

[breaking-change]
2014-10-29 11:43:07 -04:00
Aaron Turon
e0ad0fcb95 Update code with new lint names 2014-10-28 08:54:21 -07:00
Daniel Micay
2bc4d3ec23 get rid of libc_heap::{malloc_raw, realloc_raw}
The C standard library functions should be used directly. The quirky
NULL / zero-size allocation workaround is no longer necessary and was
adding an extra branch to the allocator code path in a build without
jemalloc. This is a small step towards liballoc being compatible with
handling OOM errors instead of aborting (#18292).

[breaking-change]
2014-10-25 14:12:19 -04:00
Daniel Micay
6f253bd49e rm unnecessary libc allocator usage 2014-10-25 12:33:27 -04:00
John Kåre Alsaker
70cef9474a Print stack overflow messages for Windows, Linux and OS X
Fixes #17562
2014-10-24 14:36:29 +02:00
Julian Orth
4765bb9cb8 Use strlen in CString::len 2014-10-21 08:12:50 +02:00
Alex Crichton
9d5d97b55d Remove a large amount of deprecated functionality
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount
of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that
only old deprecated functionality was removed.

This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking
change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how
to migrate code forward if it still needs migration.

[breaking-change]
2014-10-19 12:59:40 -07:00
Luqman Aden
ce6226e6c9 libnative: Remove all uses of {:?}. 2014-10-16 11:15:35 -04:00
NODA, Kai
f27ad3d3e9 Clean up rustc warnings.
compiletest: compact "linux" "macos" etc.as "unix".
liballoc: remove a superfluous "use".
libcollections: remove invocations of deprecated methods in favor of
    their suggested replacements and use "_" for a loop counter.
libcoretest: remove invocations of deprecated methods;  also add
    "allow(deprecated)" for testing a deprecated method itself.
libglob: use "cfg_attr".
libgraphviz: add a test for one of data constructors.
libgreen: remove a superfluous "use".
libnum: "allow(type_overflow)" for type cast into u8 in a test code.
librustc: names of static variables should be in upper case.
libserialize: v[i] instead of get().
libstd/ascii: to_lowercase() instead of to_lower().
libstd/bitflags: modify AnotherSetOfFlags to use i8 as its backend.
    It will serve better for testing various aspects of bitflags!.
libstd/collections: "allow(deprecated)" for testing a deprecated
    method itself.
libstd/io: remove invocations of deprecated methods and superfluous "use".
    Also add #[test] where it was missing.
libstd/num: introduce a helper function to effectively remove
    invocations of a deprecated method.
libstd/path and rand: remove invocations of deprecated methods and
    superfluous "use".
libstd/task and libsync/comm: "allow(deprecated)" for testing
    a deprecated method itself.
libsync/deque: remove superfluous "unsafe".
libsync/mutex and once: names of static variables should be in upper case.
libterm: introduce a helper function to effectively remove
    invocations of a deprecated method.

We still see a few warnings about using obsoleted native::task::spawn()
in the test modules for libsync.  I'm not sure how I should replace them
with std::task::TaksBuilder and native::task::NativeTaskBuilder
(dependency to libstd?)

Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
2014-10-13 14:16:22 +08:00
Alex Crichton
dae48a07f3 Register new snapshots
Also convert a number of `static mut` to just a plain old `static` and remove
some unsafe blocks.
2014-10-10 22:09:49 -07:00
bors
45797a0765 auto merge of #17037 : kmcallister/rust/no-stack-check, r=thestinger
r? @brson 

Fixes #16980.
2014-10-10 07:52:00 +00:00
bors
f9fc49c06e auto merge of #17853 : alexcrichton/rust/issue-17718, r=pcwalton
This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of
global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old
`static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a
`const`.

The semantics of these three kinds of globals are:

* A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants
  are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined
  at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well,
  constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a
  modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant
  itself.

  Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior
  mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but
  they should in general not come up too often.

* A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any
  references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory
  location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`.
  This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static`
  concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a
  future extension not implemented at this time.

* A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references
  to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`.

This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated
accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is:

* Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a
  memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the
  matched-on-`static` to a `const`.

      static FOO: uint = 4;
      match n {
          FOO => { /* ... */ }
          _ => { /* ... */ }
      }

  change this code to:

      const FOO: uint = 4;
      match n {
          FOO => { /* ... */ }
          _ => { /* ... */ }
      }

* Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being
  able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could
  possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a
  constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other
  statics by address, however.

* Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths.
  This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead.

[breaking-change]
Closes #17718 

[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
2014-10-10 00:07:08 +00:00
Alex Crichton
0b517117b3 Test fixes and rebase conflicts 2014-10-09 16:36:07 -07:00
Keegan McAllister
db3bd23467 Rename the no_split_stack attribute to no_stack_check
The old name is misleading as we haven't had segmented stacks in quite some
time. But we still recognize it, with a deprecation warning.
2014-10-09 14:24:36 -07:00