Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #110333 (rustc_metadata: Split `children` into multiple tables)
- #110501 (rustdoc: fix ICE from rustc_resolve and librustdoc parse divergence)
- #110608 (Specialize some `io::Read` and `io::Write` methods for `VecDeque<u8>` and `&[u8]`)
- #110632 (Panic instead of truncating if the incremental on-disk cache is too big)
- #110633 (More `mem::take` in `library`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Ensure mir_drops_elaborated_and_const_checked when requiring codegen.
mir_drops_elaborated_and_const_checked may emit errors while codegen has started, and the compiler would exit leaving object code files around.
Found by `@cuviper` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109731
By placing the stdout in a CDATA block we avoid almost all escaping, as
there's only two byte sequences you can't sneak into a CDATA and you can
handle that with some only slightly regrettable CDATA-splitting. I've
done this in at least two other implementations of the junit xml format
over the years and it's always worked out. The only quirk new to this
(for me) is smuggling newlines as 
 to avoid literal newlines in the
output.
`provide_sorted_batch` in core is incorrectly marked with
`#[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]` which prevents core
from building with the cfg enabled.
Nothing in core allocates memory including this function, so
the `cfg` gate is incorrect.
Deduplicate unreachable blocks, for real this time
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106428 (in particular 41eda69516) we noticed that inlining `unreachable_unchecked` can produce duplicate unreachable blocks. So we improved two MIR optimizations: `SimplifyCfg` was given a simplify to deduplicate unreachable blocks, then `InstCombine` was given a combiner to deduplicate switch targets that point at the same block. The problem is that change doesn't actually work.
Our current pass order is
```
SimplifyCfg (does nothing relevant to this situation)
Inline (produces multiple unreachable blocks)
InstCombine (doesn't do anything here, oops)
SimplifyCfg (produces the duplicate SwitchTargets that InstCombine is looking for)
```
So in here, I have factored out the specific function from `InstCombine` and placed it inside the simplify that produces the case it is looking for. This should ensure that it runs in the scenario it was designed for.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110551
r? `@cjgillot`
Panic instead of truncating if the incremental on-disk cache is too big
It seems _unlikely_ that anyone would hit this truncation, but if this `as` does actually truncate, that seems incredibly bad.
Specialize some `io::Read` and `io::Write` methods for `VecDeque<u8>` and `&[u8]`
This improves implementation of:
- `<&[u8]>::read_to_string`
- `VecDeque<u8>::read_to_end`
- `VecDeque<u8>::read_to_string`
- `VecDeque<u8>::write_vectored`
rustc_metadata: Split `children` into multiple tables
instead of merging everything into a single bag.
If it's acceptable from performance point of view, then it's more clear to keep this stuff organized more in accordance with its use.
instead of merging everything into a single bag.
If it's acceptable from performance point of view, then it's more clear to keep this stuff organized more in accordance with its use.
Added byte position range for `proc_macro::Span`
Currently, the [`Debug`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/proc_macro/struct.Span.html#impl-Debug-for-Span) implementation for [`proc_macro::Span`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/proc_macro/struct.Span.html#) calls the debug function implemented in the trait implementation of `server::Span` for the type `Rustc` in the `rustc-expand` crate.
The current implementation, of the referenced function, looks something like this:
```rust
fn debug(&mut self, span: Self::Span) -> String {
if self.ecx.ecfg.span_debug {
format!("{:?}", span)
} else {
format!("{:?} bytes({}..{})", span.ctxt(), span.lo().0, span.hi().0)
}
}
```
It returns the byte position of the [`Span`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/proc_macro/struct.Span.html#) as an interpolated string.
Because this is currently the only way to get a spans position in the file, I might lead someone, who is interested in this information, to parsing this interpolated string back into a range of bytes, which I think is a very non-rusty way.
The proposed `position()`, method implemented in this PR, gives the ability to directly get this info.
It returns a [`std::ops::Range`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/struct.Range.html#) wrapping the lowest and highest byte of the [`Span`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/proc_macro/struct.Span.html#).
I put it behind the `proc_macro_span` feature flag because many of the other functions that have a similar footprint also are annotated with it, I don't actually know if this is right.
It would be great if somebody could take a look at this, thank you very much in advanced.
