internal: Migrate assists to the structured snippet API, part 3
Continuing from #15231
Migrates the following assists:
- `add_missing_match_arms`
- `fix_visibility`
- `promote_local_to_const`
The `add_missing_match_arms` changes are best reviewed commit-by-commit since they're relatively big changes compared to the rest of the commits.
`clone_for_update` is relatively cheap in comparison, since making a
node require parsing an entire source text
Adds a test to make sure that it doesn't crash when multiple uses are
present.
Skip building subtrees for builtin derives
This is a waste of resources, we go from node to subtree just to go from subtree to node in the expander impl. We can skip the subtree building and only build the tokenmap instead.
internal: Migrate more assists to use the structured snippet API
Continuing from #14979
Migrates the following assists:
- `generate_derive`
- `wrap_return_type_in_result`
- `generate_delegate_methods`
As a bonus, `generate_delegate_methods` now generates the function and impl block at the correct indentation 🎉.
`does_not_fill_wildcard_with_wildcard`
and `does_not_fill_wildcard_with_partial_wildcard_and_wildcard`
both made no modifications to the code,
which is a problem for mutable ast porting as it generates a best-effort
minimal set of text edits,
and assists require at least one text edit.
# Overview
Extracting a match arm value that has type unit into a function, when a
comma already follows the match arm value, results in an invalid (syntax
error) semicolon added between the newly generated function's generated
call and the comma.
# Example
Running this extraction
```rust
fn main() {
match () {
_ => $0()$0,
};
}
```
would lead to
```rust
fn main() {
match () {
_ => fun_name();,
};
}
fn fun_name() {
}
```
# Issue / Fix details
This happens because when there is no comma, rust-analyzer would simply
add the comma and wouldn't even try to evaluate whether it needs to add
a semicolon. But when the comma is there, it proceeds to evaluate
whether it needs to add a semicolon and it looks like the evaluation
logic erroneously ignores the possibility that we're in a match arm.
IIUC it never makes sense to add a semicolon when we're extracting from
a match arm value, so I've adjusted the logic to always decide against
adding a semicolon when we're in a match arm
Can actually split out adding the functions from getting the impl to
update or create thanks to being able to refer to the impl ast node.
FIXME Context:
Unfortunately we can't adjust the indentation of the newly added function
inside of `ast::AssocItemList::add_item` since for some reason the `todo!()`
placeholder generated by `add_missing_impl_members` and
`replace_derive_with_manual_impl` gets indented weirdly.
Implement recursion in mir interpreter without recursion
This enables interpreting functions with deep stack + profiling. I also applied some changes to make it faster based on the profiling result.
Unify getter and setter assists
This PR combines what previously have been two different files into a single file. I want to talk about the reasons why I did this. The issue that prompted this PR ( and before I forget : this pr fixes#15080 ) mentions an interesting behavior. We combine these two assists into an assist group and the order in which the assists are listed in this group changes depending on the text range of the selected area. The reason for that is that VSCode prioritizes actions that have a bigger impact in a smaller area and until now generate setter assist was only possible to be invoked for a single field whereas you could generate multiple getters for the getter assist. So I used the latter's infra to make former applicable to multiple fields, hence the unification. So this PR solves in essence
1. Make `generate setter` applicable to multiple fields
2. Provide a consistent order of the said assists in listing.
Don't show `unresolved-field` diagnostic for missing names
I don't think reporting ``"no field `[missing name]` on type `SomeType`"`` makes much sense because it's a syntax error rather than a semantic error. We already report a syntax error for it and I find it sufficient.
