This is an implementation of [RFC 1030][rfc] which adds these traits to the
prelude and additionally removes all inherent `into_iter` methods on collections
in favor of the trait implementation (which is now accessible by default).
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1030
This is technically a breaking change due to the prelude additions and removal
of inherent methods, but it is expected that essentially no code breaks in
practice.
[breaking-change]
Closes#24538
For now, words() is left in (but deprecated), and Words is a type alias for
struct SplitWhitespace.
Also cleaned up references to str.words() throughout codebase.
Closes#15628
Check for duplicate loop labels in function bodies.
See also: http://internals.rust-lang.org/t/psa-rejecting-duplicate-loop-labels/1833
The change, which we are putting in as future-proofing in preparation for future potential additions to the language (namely labeling arbitrary blocks and using those labels in borrow expressions), means that code like this will start emitting warnings:
```rust
fn main() {
{ 'a: loop { break; } }
{ 'a: loop { break; } }
}
```
To make the above code compile without warnings, write this instead:
```rust
fn main() {
{ 'a: loop { break; } }
{ 'b: loop { break; } }
}
```
Since this change is only introducing a new warnings, this change is non-breaking.
Fix#21633
For now, words() is left in (but deprecated), and Words is a type alias for
struct SplitWhitespace.
Also cleaned up references to s.words() throughout codebase.
Closes#15628
This is an implementation of [RFC 1030][rfc] which adds these traits to the
prelude and additionally removes all inherent `into_iter` methods on collections
in favor of the trait implementation (which is now accessible by default).
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1030
This is technically a breaking change due to the prelude additions and removal
of inherent methods, but it is expected that essentially no code breaks in
practice.
[breaking-change]
Closes#24538
typeck: Do high-level structural/signature checks before function body checks.
This avoids various ICEs, e.g. premature calls to cat_expr that yield the dreaded "cat_expr Errd" ICE.
However, it also means that some early error feedback is now not provided. This may be for the best, because the error feedback were were providing in some of those cases were false positives -- it was spurious feedback and a distraction from the real problem.
So it is not 100% clear whether we actually want to put this change in or not. I think its a net win, but others might disagree.
(Kudos to @arielb1 for suggesting this modification.)
(The cast from the 64-bit value to isize was using the lower 32-bits,
which led to it being treated as a large positive value rather than a
smallish negative one. The fix was to use the same bits for the upper-
and lower- 32 bits.)
closes#24434
This PR changes executes `syntax::config::strip_unconfigured_items` before `syntax::feature_gate::check_crate_macros(sess.codemap()`. As far as I know, `strip_unconfigured_items` should be independent of `check_crate_macros`.
Fixes#20596 by making `Debug` render negative zero with a `-` without affecting the behavior of `Display`.
While I was at it, I also removed some dead code from `float_to_str_bytes_common` (the one from `libcore/fmt/float.rs`, not the function of the same name in `libstd/num/strconv.rs`). It had support for different bases, and for negative numbers, but the function is internal to core and the couple places that call it (all in `libcore/fmt/mod.rs`) never use those features: They pass in `num.abs()` and base 10.
Now that the internals of `format_args!` are unstable, tests that use it
don't compile after pretty-printing (unless they also declare the necessary
feature).
We provide tools to tell what exact symbols to emit for any fn or static, but
don’t quite check if that won’t cause any issues later on. Some of the issues
include LLVM mangling our names again and our names pointing to wrong locations,
us generating dumb foreign call wrappers, linker errors, extern functions
resolving to different symbols altogether (`extern {fn fail();} fail();` in some
cases calling `fail1()`), etc.
Before the commit we had a function called `note_unique_llvm_symbol`, so it is
clear somebody was aware of the issue at some point, but the function was barely
used, mostly in irrelevant locations.
Along with working on it I took liberty to start refactoring trans/base into
a few smaller modules. The refactoring is incomplete and I hope I will find some
motivation to carry on with it.
This is possibly a [breaking-change] because it makes dumbly written code
properly invalid.
This fixes all those issues about incorrect use of #[no_mangle] being not reported/misreported/ICEd by the compiler.
NB. This PR does not attempt to tackle the parallel codegen issue that was mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/22811, but I believe it should be very straightforward in a follow up PR by modifying `trans::declare::get_defined_value` to look at all the contexts.
cc @alexcrichton @huonw @nrc because you commented on the original RFC issue.
EDIT: wow, this became much bigger than I initially intended.
Statement macros are now treated somewhat like item macros, in that a statement macro can now expand into a series of statements, rather than just a single statement.
This allows statement macros to be nested inside other kinds of macros and expand properly, where previously the expansion would only work when no nesting was present.
See:
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-stmt_macro_in_expr_macro.rs`
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-nested_stmt_macro.rs`
This changes the interface of the MacResult trait. make_stmt has become make_stmts and now returns a vector, rather than a single item. Plugin writers who were implementing MacResult will have breakage, as well as anyone using MacEager::stmt.
See:
- `src/libsyntax/ext/base.rs`
This also causes a minor difference in behavior to the diagnostics produced by certain malformed macros.
See:
- `src/test/compile-fail/macro-incomplete-parse.rs`
