Custom MIR: Allow optional RET type annotation
This currently doesn't compile because the type of `RET` is inferred, which fails if RET is a composite type and fields are initialised separately.
```rust
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
extern crate core;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
fn fn0() -> (i32, bool) {
mir! ({
RET.0 = 0;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
})
}
```
```
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> src/lib.rs:8:9
|
8 | RET.0 = 0;
| ^^^ cannot infer type
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0282`.
```
This PR allows the user to manually specify the return type with `type RET = ...;` if required:
```rust
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
fn fn0() -> (i32, bool) {
mir! (
type RET = (i32, bool);
{
RET.0 = 0;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
}
)
}
```
The syntax is not optimal, I'm happy to see other suggestions. Ideally I wanted it to be a normal type annotation like `let RET: ...;`, but this runs into the multiple parsing options error during macro expansion, as it can be parsed as a normal `let` declaration as well.
r? ```@oli-obk``` or ```@tmiasko``` or ```@JakobDegen```
Custom MIR: Support binary and unary operations
Lower binary and unary operations directly to corresponding unchecked MIR
operations. Ultimately this might not be syntax we want, but it allows for
experimentation in the meantime.
r? ````@oli-obk```` ````@JakobDegen````
The test cases src/test/mir-opt/building/custom/consts.rs and
src/test/mir-opt/const_prop/mutable_variable_no_prop.rs are
currently failing on big-endian platforms as the binary encoding
of some constants is hard-coded in the MIR test files. Fix this
by choosing constant values that have the same encoding on big-
and little-endian platforms.
The test case src/test/mir-opt/issues/issue_75439.rs is failing
as well, but since the purpose of the test is to validate handling
of big-endian integer encodings on a little-endian platform, it does
not make much sense to run it on big-endian platforms in the first
place - we can just ignore it there.
Fixed part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105383.
