chore: add some `tracing` to project loading
I wanted to see what's happening during project loading and if it could be parallelized. I'm thinking maybe, but it's not this PR :)
Try to generate more meaningful names in json converter
I just found out about rust-analyzer json converter, but I think it would be more convenient, if names were more useful, like using the names of the keys.
Let's look at some realistic arbitrary json:
```json
{
"user": {
"address": {
"street": "Main St",
"house": 3
},
"email": "example@example.com"
}
}
```
I think, new generated code is much easier to read and to edit, than the old:
```rust
// Old
struct Struct1{ house: i64, street: String }
struct Struct2{ address: Struct1, email: String }
struct Struct3{ user: Struct2 }
// New
struct Address1{ house: i64, street: String }
struct User1{ address: Address1, email: String }
struct Root1{ user: User1 }
```
Ideally, if we drop the numbers, I can see it being usable just as is (may be rename root)
```rust
struct Address{ house: i64, street: String }
struct User{ address: Address, email: String }
struct Root{ user: User }
```
Sadly, we can't just drop them, because there can be multiple fields (recursive) with the same name, and we can't just easily retroactively add numbers if the name has 2 instances due to parsing being single pass.
We could ignore the `1` and add number only if it's > 1, but I will leave this open to discussion and right now made it the simpler way
In sum, even with numbers, I think this PR still helps in readability
feat: Allow rust files to be used linkedProjects
With this, script files become more usable as the user can at least add them manually to the linked projects, allowing them to be used "on the (manual) fly" without having to open a separate vscode window that only has files open and no folder.
Also makes build scripts work for them (though no proc-macros, for some reason the dylib field is not populated in the output)
Make test harness arguments configurable and not `--nocapture`.
* Added config `runnables.extraTestBinaryArgs` to control the args.
* The default is `--show-output` rather than `--nocapture` to prevent unreadable output when 2 or more tests fail or print output at once.
* Renamed variables in `CargoTargetSpec::runnable_args()` for clarity.
Fixes#12737.
Suggested changelog info:
> New Features
>
> * add `rust-analyzer.runnables.extraTestBinaryArgs` to configure test harness options when running tests; replaces a previously hard-coded `--nocapture` option.
I'm not sure I made the right choices in vocabulary, between “binary”, “executable”, and “runnable”, and “launch” vs. “execute”, so let me know if I missed something to be consistent with in the naming and documentation.
* Added config `runnables.extraTestBinaryArgs` to control the args.
* The default is `--show-output` rather than `--nocapture` to prevent
unreadable output when 2 or more tests fail or print output at once.
* Renamed variables in `CargoTargetSpec::runnable_args()` for clarity.
Fixes <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12737>.
Instead of using `core::fmt::format` to format panic messages, which may in turn
panic too and cause recursive panics and other messy things, redirect
`panic_fmt` to `const_panic_fmt` like CTFE, which in turn goes to
`panic_display` and does the things normally. See the tests for the full
call stack.
Render matched macro arm on hover of macro calls
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/4028, its a different take on the idea. I don't like go to being changed here simply because we can't point the focus range on the name anymore as we usually do, and some editors might use this feature (and the focus range) for certain other things. We could instead add a new hover action for this to move to the arm directly (or maybe make `go to implementation` jump to the arm?)
Add CONTRIBUTING.md
I'm not great with these kinds of documents, but the main point I want to be able to raise is that feature implementations should have an issue raised first for discussion.
