Ensure separate activations only occur for assignments to locals
Ensure separate activations only occur for assignments to locals, not projections.
Fix#46746.
(I didn't make a regression test because we do not really have a good way to directly express the case that we are trying to catch, because we cannot write MIR directly.)
Outputs in InlineAsm can be read-write, so splitting it out is useful for things like Store-Store folding, as it cannot be done for a Store-AsmOutput.
This PR is intended to make no changes, just be the mechanical split of the enum. Future changes can use the split, like a MIR pass I'm working on and perhaps two-phase borrows.
Instead we are "just" careful to invoke it (which sets up a bunch of kill bits)
before we go into the code that sets up the gen bits.
That way, when the gen bits are set up, they will override any
previously set kill-bits for those reservations or activations.
High-level picture: The old `Borrows` analysis is now called
`Reservations` (implemented as a newtype wrapper around `Borrows`);
this continues to compute whether a `Rvalue::Ref` can reach a
statement without an intervening `EndRegion`. In addition, we also
track what `Place` each such `Rvalue::Ref` was immediately assigned
to in a given borrow (yay for MIR-structural properties!).
The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis then tracks the initial use of any of
those assigned `Places` for a given borrow. I.e. a borrow becomes
"active" immediately after it starts being "used" in some way. (This
is conservative in the sense that we will treat a copy `x = y;` as a
use of `y`; in principle one might further delay activation in such
cases.)
The new `ActiveBorrows` analysis needs to take the `Reservations`
results as an initial input, because the reservation state influences
the gen/kill sets for `ActiveBorrows`. In particular, a use of `a`
activates a borrow `a = &b` if and only if there exists a path (in the
control flow graph) from the borrow to that use. So we need to know if
the borrow reaches a given use to know if it really gets a gen-bit or
not.
* Incorporating the output from one dataflow analysis into the input
of another required more changes to the infrastructure than I had
expected, and even after those changes, the resulting code is still
a bit subtle.
* In particular, Since we need to know the intrablock reservation
state, we need to dynamically update a bitvector for the
reservations as we are also trying to compute the gen/kills
bitvector for the active borrows.
* The way I ended up deciding to do this (after also toying with at
least two other designs) is to put both the reservation state and
the active borrow state into a single bitvector. That is why we now
have separate (but related) `BorrowIndex` and
`ReserveOrActivateIndex`: each borrow index maps to a pair of
neighboring reservation and activation indexes.
As noted above, these changes are solely adding the active borrows
dataflow analysis (and updating the existing code to cope with the
switch from `Borrows` to `Reservations`). The code to process the
bitvector in the borrow checker currently just skips over all of the
active borrow bits.
But atop this commit, one *can* observe the analysis results by
looking at the graphviz output, e.g. via
```rust
#[rustc_mir(borrowck_graphviz_preflow="pre_two_phase.dot",
borrowck_graphviz_postflow="post_two_phase.dot")]
```
Includes doc for `FindPlaceUses`, as well as `Reservations` and
`ActiveBorrows` structs, which are wrappers are the `Borrows` struct
that dictate which flow analysis should be performed.
This is meant to ease development of multi-stage dataflow analyses
where the output from one analysis is used to initialize the state
for the next; in such a context, you cannot start with `bottom_value`
for all the bits.
If the gen/kill bits are set there, the effects of `start_block_effects`
will not be seen when using `FlowAtLocation` etc. to go over the MIR.
EverInitializedLvals is the only pass that got this wrong, but this
fixes the footgun for everyone.
We now visit just the stuff in the CFG, and we add liveness
constraints for all the random types, regions etc that appear within
rvalues and statements.
In particular, if we see a variable is DROP-LIVE, but it is not
MAYBE-INIT, then we can ignore the drop. This leavess attempt to use
more complex refinements of the idea (e.g., for subpaths or subfields)
to future work.
Region inference can create borrows for an empty region if the borrow is
dead. In that case, there's no reason to track the borrow, but because
there's no such thing as an EndRegion(ReEmpty) these borrows used to live
for the entire function.
Fixes#46161.
Also, factor out `do_mir_borrowck`, which is the code that actually
performs the MIR borrowck from within the scope of an inference context.
This change should be a pure refactoring.
`EndRegion` do not always correspond to borrow-data entries
Remove assertion that the argument to every `EndRegion` correspond to some dataflow-tracked borrow-data entry.
Fix#44828
(The comment thread on the aforementioned issue discusses why its best to just remove this assertion.)
some dataflow-tracked borrow-data entry.
Fix#44828
(The comment thread on the aforementioned issue discusses why its best
to just remove this assertion.)
