Improve error message when typo is made in format!
The expansion of the format! built-in macro is roughly done in two steps:
- the format expression is parsed, the arguments are parsed,
- the format expression is checked to be a string literal, code is expanded.
The problem is that the expression parser can eat too much tokens, which invalidates the parsing of the next format arguments. As the format expression check happens next, the error emitted concerns the format arguments, whereas the problem is about the format expression.
This PR contains two commits. The first one actually checks that the formatting expression is a string literal before raising any error about the formatting arguments, and the second one contains some simple heuristics which allow to suggest, when the format expression is followed by a dot instead of a comma, to suggest to replace the dot with a comma.
This pull request should fix#75492.
Note: this is my first non-doc contribution to the rust ecosystem. Feel free to make any comment about my code, or whatever. I'll be very happy to fix it :)
LLVM can't figure out in
let rem = self.len() % chunk_size;
let len = self.len() - rem;
let (fst, snd) = self.split_at(len);
and
let rem = self.len() % chunk_size;
let (fst, snd) = self.split_at(rem);
that the index passed to split_at() is smaller than the slice length and
adds a bounds check plus panic for it.
Apart from removing the overhead of the bounds check this also allows
LLVM to optimize code around the ChunksExact iterator better.
These are unsafe variants of the non-unchecked functions and don't do
any bounds checking.
For the time being these are not public and only a preparation for the
following commit. Making it public and stabilization can follow later
and be discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76014 .
Previous implementation used the `Parser::parse_expr` function in order
to extract the format expression. If the first comma following the
format expression was mistakenly replaced with a dot, then the next
format expression was eaten by the function, because it looked as a
syntactically valid expression, which resulted in incorrectly spanned
error messages.
The way the format expression is exctracted is changed: we first look at
the first available token in the first argument supplied to the
`format!` macro call. If it is a string literal, then it is promoted as
a format expression immediatly, otherwise we fall back to the original
`parse_expr`-related method.
This allows us to ensure that the parser won't consume too much tokens
when a typo is made.
A test has been created so that it is ensured that the issue is properly
fixed.
This commit removes the obsolete printer and replaces all uses of it
with `FmtPrinter`. Of the replaced uses, all but one use was in `debug!`
logging, two cases were notable:
- `MonoItem::to_string` is used in `-Z print-mono-items` and therefore
affects the output of all codegen-units tests.
- `DefPathBasedNames` was used in `librustc_codegen_llvm/type_of.rs`
with `LLVMStructCreateNamed` and that'll now get different values, but
this should result in no functional change.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
StringReader is an intornal abstraction which at the moment changes a
lot, so these unit tests cause quite a bit of friction.
Moving them to rustc_lexer and more ingerated-testing style should
make them much less annoying, hopefully without decreasing their
usefulness much.
Note that coloncolon tests are removed (it's unclear what those are
testing).
\r\n tests are removed as well, as we normalize line endings even
before lexing.
Fixes#75930
This changes the tokens seen by a proc-macro. However, ising a `#[cfg]` attribute
on a generic paramter is unusual, and combining it with a proc-macro
derive is probably even more unusual. I don't expect this to cause any
breakage.
Move almost all compiler crates to compiler/
This PR implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/336 and moves all `rustc_*` crates from `src` to the new `compiler` directory.
`librustc_foo` directories are renamed to `rustc_foo`.
`src` directories are introduced inside `rustc_*` directories to mirror the scheme already use for `library` crates.
Fix intra-doc links for cross-crate re-exports of default trait methods
The original fix for this was very simple: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58972 ignored `extern_traits` because before https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983 was fixed, they would always fail to resolve, giving spurious warnings. So the first commit just undoes that change, so extern traits are now seen by the `collect_intra_doc_links` pass. There are also some minor changes in `librustdoc/fold.rs` to avoid borrowing the `extern_traits` RefCell more than once at a time.
However, that brought up a much more thorny problem. `rustc_resolve` started giving 'error: cannot find a built-in macro with name `cfg`' when documenting `libproc_macro` (I still haven't been able to reproduce on anything smaller than the full standard library). The chain of events looked like this (thanks @eddyb for the help debugging!):
0. `x.py build --stage 1` builds the standard library and creates a sysroot
1. `cargo doc` does something like `cargo check` to create `rmeta`s for all the crates (unrelated to what was built above)
2. the `cargo check`-like `libcore-*.rmeta` is loaded as a transitive dependency *and claims ownership* of builtin macros
3. `rustdoc` later tries to resolve some path in a doc link
4. suggestion logic fires and loads "extern prelude" crates by name
5. the sysroot `libcore-*.rlib` is loaded and *fails to claim ownership* of builtin macros
`rustc_resolve` gives the error after step 5. However, `rustdoc` doesn't need suggestions at all - `resolve_str_path_error` completely discards the `ResolutionError`! The fix implemented in this PR is to skip the suggestion logic for `resolve_ast_path`: pass `record_used: false` and skip `lookup_import_candidates` when `record_used` isn't set.
It's possible that if/when https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74207 is implemented this will need a more in-depth fix which returns a `ResolutionError` from `compile_macro`, to allow rustdoc to reuse the suggestions from rustc_resolve. However, that's a much larger change and there's no need for it yet, so I haven't implemented it here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73829.
r? @GuillaumeGomez
This avoids a rare rustdoc bug where loading `core` twice caused a
'cannot find a built-in macro' error:
1. `x.py build --stage 1` builds the standard library and creates a sysroot
2. `cargo doc` does something like `cargo check` to create `rmeta`s for all the crates (unrelated to what was built above)
3. the `cargo check`-like `libcore-*.rmeta` is loaded as a transitive dependency *and claims ownership* of builtin macros
4. `rustdoc` later tries to resolve some path in a doc link
5. suggestion logic fires and loads "extern prelude" crates by name
6. the sysroot `libcore-*.rlib` is loaded and *fails to claim ownership* of builtin macros
This fixes step 5. by not running suggestion logic if this is a
speculative resolution. Additionally, it marks `resolve_ast_path` as a
speculative resolution.
`alloc::slice` uses `core::slice` functions, documentation are copied
from there and the links as well without resolution. `crate::ptr...`
cannot be resolved in `alloc::slice`, but `ptr` itself is imported in
both `alloc::slice` and `core::slice`, so we used that instead.
vars() rather than vars function
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Use [xxx()] rather than the [xxx] function
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Env text representation of function intra-doc link
Suggested by @jyn514
Link join_paths in env doc for parity
Change xxx to env::xxx for lib env doc
Add link requsted by @jyn514
Fix doc build with same link
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Fix missing intra-doc link
Fix added whitespace in doc
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Add brackets for `join_paths`
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Use unused link join_paths
Removed same link for join_paths
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Remove unsed link join_paths
Fix intra-doc links for associated constants
Previously, only associated functions would be resolved. Fixes the issues in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75969#discussion_r477898003.
I'm a little uncomfortable hard-coding the string constants, but it looks like that's how it's done elsewhere. I might make a follow-up PR at some point putting it in one place.
Not sure how to test associated types, since AFAIK there aren't any on primitives.
r? @Manishearth
