Extend `explicit_iter_loop` and `explicit_into_iter_loop`
fixes#1518
Some included cleanups
* Split `for_loop` test into different files for each lint (partially).
* Move handling of some `into_iter` cases from `explicit_into_iter`.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`explicit_iter_loop`]: Now also handles types that implement `IntoIterator`.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
changelog: Sugg: [`explicit_into_iter_loop`]: The suggestion now works on mutable references.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `needless_if` lint
first off: Sorry about the large diff. Seems a ton of tests do this (understandably so).
this is basically everything I wanted in #10868, while it doesn't lint *all* unnecessary empty blocks, it lints needless if statements; which are basically the crux of the issue (for me) anyway. I've committed code that includes this far too many times 😅 hopefully clippy can help me out soon
closes#10868
changelog: New lint [`needless_if`]
handle exponent without digits in `numeric_literal`
Fixes#10912
The numeric literal util module didn't check for exponents with no digits.
So:
384cf37612/clippy_utils/src/numeric_literal.rs (L163-L168)
`exponent` here would be the empty string, which passed the `!= "0"` check (when it shouldn't have, it should probably be treated as if the user wrote `E0`), then later fails when counting the digits and subtracting one (0 - 1 = overflow).
Also, interestingly I can't even write a test for this because exponents with no digits is some kind of error by itself and `cargo dev fmt` fails on it.
changelog: [`unreadable_literal`]: don't (debug) ICE on numeric literal with empty exponent
Direct towards late passes in `cargo dev new_lint`
changelog: none
This would be the tooling part of #9311
- `--pass late` is now the default
- It prints a message recommending the use of a late pass if you choose `--pass early`
Fix `diverging_sub_expression` not checking body of block
Fixes#10776
This also adds a warning to the test `ui/never_loop.rs`, not sure if this is correct or not.
changelog: [`diverging_sub_expression`]: Fix false negatives with body of block
Uplift `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint.
## `undropped_manually_drops`
(warn-by-default)
The `undropped_manually_drops` lint check for calls to `std::mem::drop` with a value of `std::mem::ManuallyDrop` which doesn't drop.
### Example
```rust
struct S;
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
```
### Explanation
`ManuallyDrop` does not drop it's inner value so calling `std::mem::drop` will not drop the inner value of the `ManuallyDrop` either.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting an clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` into rustc
[`unnecessary_to_owned`]: check that the adjusted type matches target
Fixes#10033.
Before this change, the lint would assume that removing the `.to_string()` in `f(&x.to_string())` would be ok if x is of some type that implements `Deref<Target = str>` and `f` takes a `&str`.
This turns out to not actually be ok if the `to_string` call is some method that exists on `x` directly, which happens if it implements `Display`/`ToString` itself.
changelog: [`unnecessary_to_owned`]: only lint if the adjusted receiver type actually matches
Ignore more pointer types in `unnecessary_cast`
Spotted this because
e2c655b4c0/tests/ui/suspicious_to_owned.rs (L9-L10)
currently fails on `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` as `c_char` is `u8` there
The current implementation checks for `as alias`, `as _`. This adds things like
- `as *const alias`
- `as *const cfg_dependant`
- `as *const _`
changelog: none
[`redundant_closure`]: special case inclusive ranges
Fixes#10684.
`x..=y` ranges need a bit of special handling in this lint because it desugars to a call to the lang item `RangeInclusiveNew`, where the callee span would be the same as the range expression itself, so the suggestion looked a bit weird. It now correctly suggests `RangeInclusive::new`.
changelog: [`redundant_closure`]: special case `RangeInclusive`
