This was previously needed because the indirection used to hide some unexplained lifetime errors, which it turned out were related to the `min_choice` algorithm.
Removing the indirection also solves a couple of cycle errors, large moves and makes async blocks support the `#[track_caller]` annotation.
always resolve to universal regions if possible
`RegionConstraintCollector::opportunistic_resolve_var`, which is used in canonicalization and projection logic, doesn't resolve the region var to an equal universal region. So if we have equated `'static == '1 == '2`, it doesn't resolve `'1` or `'2` to `'static`. Now it does!
Addresses review comment https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107376#discussion_r1093233687.
r? `@lcnr`
Account for binders correctly when adding default RPITIT method assumption
As of #108203, we install extra projection predicates into the param-env of a default trait method when it has return-position `impl Trait` (or is async).
The implementation didn't account for the fact that it's walking into and out of binders, so we just need to shift all the debruijn indices accordingly when constructing the projection predicates.
Fixes#108579
r? types
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108619 (Remove the option to disable `llvm-version-check`)
- #108728 (infer: fix and improve comments)
- #108731 (feat: impl better help for `.poll()` not found on `impl Future`)
- #108774 (Greatly improve the error messages when `run-make/translation` fails)
- #108805 (Update askama to 0.12 and improve whitespace control)
- #108823 (Add tracking issue for cf-protection to unstable book)
- #108855 (Custom MIR: Support `as` casts)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
feat: impl better help for `.poll()` not found on `impl Future`
Partially address #108572
I'd like to also address suggestions for generalized `Self` parameters as well. That'll be a separate PR.
Use `nuw` when calculating slice lengths from `Range`s
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
fix multiple issues when promoting type-test subject
Multiple interdependent fixes. See linked issues for a short description of each.
When Promoting a type-test `T: 'a` from within the closure back to its parent function, there are a couple pre-existing bugs and limitations. They were exposed by the recent changes to opaque types because the type-test subject (`T`) is no longer a simple ParamTy.
Commit 1:
Fixes#108635Fixes#107426
Commit 2:
Fixes#108639
Commit 3:
Fixes#107516
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107801 (const_eval: `implies_by` in `rustc_const_unstable`)
- #108750 (Fix `ObligationCtxt::sub`)
- #108780 (Add regression tests for issue 70919)
- #108786 (Check for free regions in MIR validation)
- #108790 (Do not ICE when interpreting a cast between non-monomorphic types)
- #108803 (Do not ICE when failing to normalize in ConstProp.)
- #108807 (Emit the suspicious_auto_trait_impls for negative impls as well)
- #108812 (Add regression test for #98444)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not ICE when failing to normalize in ConstProp.
There is no reason to delay a bug there, as we bubble up the failure as TooGeneric.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97728
Add regression tests for issue 70919
Desugaring DropAndReplace at MIR build (#107844) fixed#70919.
Add regressions tests, borrowed from #102078, to ensure we check for this in the future.
cc ``@Aaron1011``
const_eval: `implies_by` in `rustc_const_unstable`
Fixes#107605.
Extend support for `implies_by` (from `#[stable]` and `#[unstable]`) to `#[rustc_const_stable]` and `#[rustc_const_unstable]`.
cc ``@steffahn``
Allow using `bool` instead of `Option<()>` in diagnostics
~~Disallow the unit type for `#[help]`, `#[note]` etc, instead using `bool` to express optional annotations without a span which I believe is more intuitive.~~
~~Test output ordering has changed in a few places, where a field was of type `()` and the annotation has been moved to the struct itself. If any of these changes are an issue, this can be restricted to allowing specifically `()`, and not `Option<()>`~~
~~Actual changes here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108402/files#diff-815b1d8debfc564112bd51093791d7c3f2ee288a37a8f5c0e89c11d1f609b4c0~~
Allows using `bool` in derive diagnostics to indicate an optional subdiagnostic without a span, where previously `Option<()>` had to be used
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108244 (Add test for semicolon recovery ICE)
- #108746 (Don't project to RPITIT that has no default value)
- #108764 (Tweaks to -Zdrop-tracking-mir)
- #108770 (Improve documentation and argument naming of some TyCtxt methods)
- #108773 (x fmt: Only check modified files locally)
- #108775 (Use the correct bound vars in return type suggestion.)
- #108776 (Make `x test tidy` less noisy)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
Use `partial_cmp` to implement tuple `lt`/`le`/`ge`/`gt`
In today's implementation, `(A, B)::gt` contains calls to *both* `A::eq` *and* `A::gt`.
That's fine for primitives, but for things like `String`s it's kinda weird -- `(String, usize)::gt` has a call to both `bcmp` and `memcmp` (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/7jbbPMesf>) because when `bcmp` says the `String`s aren't equal, it turns around and calls `memcmp` to find out which one's bigger.
This PR changes the implementation to instead implement `(A, …, C, Z)::gt` using `A::partial_cmp`, `…::partial_cmp`, `C::partial_cmp`, and `Z::gt`. (And analogously for `lt`, `le`, and `ge`.) That way expensive comparisons don't need to be repeated.
Technically this is an observable change on stable, so I've marked it `needs-fcp` + `T-libs-api` and will
r? rust-lang/libs-api
I'm hoping that this will be non-controversial, however, since it's very similar to the observable changes that were made to the derives (#81384#98655) -- like those, this only changes behaviour if a type overrode behaviour in a way inconsistent with the rules for the various traits involved.
(The first commit here is #108156, adding the codegen test, which I used to make sure this doesn't regress behaviour for primitives.)
Zulip conversation about this change: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/.60.3E.60.20on.20Tuples/near/328392927>.
