Remove redundant `expect_local()` call
The field `owner` of `HirId` is `LocalDefId` and `hir_id.owner.to_def_id().expect_local()` is redundant. I wonder they were introduced in some rustups.
changelog: none
No lint with `cfg!` and fix sugg for macro in `needless_bool` lint
Don't lint if `cfg!` macro is one of the operand.
Fix suggestion when the span originated from a macro, using `hir_with_macro_callsite`.
Fixes: #3973
changelog: none
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #77984 (Compute proper module parent during resolution)
- #78085 (MIR validation should check `SwitchInt` values are valid for the type)
- #78208 (replace `#[allow_internal_unstable]` with `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` for `const fn`s)
- #78209 (Update `compiler_builtins` to 0.1.36)
- #78276 (Bump backtrace-rs to enable Mach-O support on iOS.)
- #78320 (Link to cargo's `build-std` feature instead of `xargo` in custom target docs)
- #78322 (BTreeMap: stop mistaking node::MIN_LEN for a node level constraint)
- #78326 (Split out statement attributes changes from #78306)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
New lint: manual-range-contains
This fixes#1110, at least for the contains-suggesting part.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: new lint: manual-range-contains
Add lint for `&mut Mutex::lock`
Fixes#1765
changelog: Add lint [`mut_mutex_lock`] for `&mut Mutex::lock` and suggests using `&mut Mutex::get_mut` instead.
Update empty_loop documentation/message.
Originally part of #6161, but now this PR only deals with `std` crates
This change:
- Updates the `std` message .
- Updates the docs to mention how the busy loops should be fixed
- Gives examples of how to do this for `no_std` targets
- Updates the tests/stderr files to test this change.
changelog: Update `empty_loop` lint documentation
Split out statement attributes changes from #78306
This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).
This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.
---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
Split out statement attributes changes from #78306
This is the same as PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78306, but `unused_doc_comments` is modified to explicitly ignore statement items (which preserves the current behavior).
This shouldn't have any user-visible effects, so it can be landed without lang team discussion.
---------
When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they
activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it.
This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example,
the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for
`#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed
the warning.
```rust
trait Foo {
#[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first();
#[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second();
}
```
However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes
only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind`
(e.g. `Item`).
Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the
`HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`.
As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on
item statements.
This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert
(non-proc-macro) attributes on statements:
* The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for
`StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind`
variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro
which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item
statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for
item statements.
* The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when
invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint
attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to
sibiling attributes on an item statement.
For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item
statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn
where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306
BTreeMap: stop mistaking node::MIN_LEN for a node level constraint
Correcting #77612 that fell into the trap of assuming that node::MIN_LEN is an imposed minimum everywhere, and trying to make it much more clear it is an offered minimum at the node level.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Link to cargo's `build-std` feature instead of `xargo` in custom target docs
The `xargo` tool is in maintenance mode since 2018 and the `build-std` feature of cargo already works reasonably well for most use cases.
Bump backtrace-rs to enable Mach-O support on iOS.
Related to rust-lang/backtrace-rs#378. Fixes backtraces on iOS that were missing in Rust v1.47.0 after switching to gimli because it only enabled Mach-O support on macOS.
Update `compiler_builtins` to 0.1.36
So, the libc build with cargo's `build-std` feature emits a lot of warnings like:
```
warning: a method with this name may be added to the standard library in the future
--> /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/compiler_builtins-0.1.35/src/int/udiv.rs:98:23
|
98 | q = n << (<$ty>::BITS - sr);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
...
268 | udivmod_inner!(n, d, rem, u128)
| ------------------------------- in this macro invocation
|
= warning: once this method is added to the standard library, the ambiguity may cause an error or change in behavior!
= note: for more information, see issue #48919 <rust-lang/rust/issues/48919>
= help: call with fully qualified syntax `Int::BITS(...)` to keep using the current method
= help: add `#![feature(int_bits_const)]` to the crate attributes to enable `num::<impl u128>::BITS`
= note: this warning originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
(You can find the full log in https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/runs/1283695796?check_suite_focus=true for example.)
0.1.36 contains https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/332 so this version should remove this warning.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/issues/1942
replace `#[allow_internal_unstable]` with `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` for `const fn`s
`#[allow_internal_unstable]` is currently used to side-step feature gate and stability checks.
While it was originally only meant to be used only on macros, its use was expanded to `const fn`s.
This pr adds stricter checks for the usage of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` (only on macros) and introduces the `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` attribute for usage on `const fn`s.
This pr does not change any of the functionality associated with the use of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` on macros or the usage of `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` (instead of `#[allow_internal_unstable]`) on `const fn`s (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69399#issuecomment-712911540).
Note: The check for `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` currently only validates that the attribute is used on a function, because I don't know how I would check if the function is a `const fn` at the place of the check. I therefore openend this as a 'draft pull request'.
Closesrust-lang/rust#69399
r? @oli-obk
Compute proper module parent during resolution
Fixes#75982
The direct parent of a module may not be a module
(e.g. `const _: () = { #[path = "foo.rs"] mod foo; };`).
To find the parent of a module for purposes of resolution, we need to
walk up the tree until we hit a module or a crate root.
Add new lint for undropped ManuallyDrop values
Adds a new lint for the following code:
```rust
struct S;
impl Drop for S {
fn drop(&mut self) {
println!("drip drop");
}
}
fn main() {
// This will not drop the `S`!!!
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
unsafe {
// This will.
std::mem::ManuallyDrop::drop(&mut std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
}
}
```
The inner value of a `ManuallyDrop` will not be dropped unless the proper, unsafe drop function is called on it. This lint makes sure that a user does not accidently use the wrong function and forget to drop a `ManuallyDrop` value.
Fixes#5581.
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: none
perf: buffer SipHasher128
This is an attempt to improve Siphasher128 performance by buffering input. Although it reduces instruction count, I'm not confident the effect on wall times, or lack-thereof, is worth the change.
---
Additional notes not reflected in source comments:
* Implementation choices were guided by a combination of results from rustc-perf and micro-benchmarks, mostly the former.
* ~~I tried a couple of different struct layouts that might be more cache friendly with no obvious effect.~~ Update: a particular struct layout was chosen, but it's not critical to performance. See comments in source and discussion below.
* I suspect that buffering would be important to a SIMD-accelerated algorithm, but from what I've read and my own tests, SipHash does not seem very amenable to SIMD acceleration, at least by SSE.
Add lint for holding RefCell Ref across an await
Fixes#6008
This introduces the lint await_holding_refcell_ref. For async functions, we iterate
over all types in generator_interior_types and look for `core::cell::Ref` or `core::cell::RefMut`. If we find one then we emit a lint.
Heavily cribs from: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/5439
changelog: introduce the await_holding_refcell_ref lint
fix def collector for impl trait
fixes#77329
We now consistently make `impl Trait` a hir owner, requiring some special casing for synthetic generic params.
r? `@eddyb`
Upgrade to measureme 9.0.0
I believe I did this correctly but there's still a reference to `measureme@0.7.1` coming from `rustc-ap-rustc_data_structures` and I'm not sure how to resolve that.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
We'll also need to deploy the new version of the tools on perf.rlo.
stop promoting union field accesses in 'const'
Turns out that promotion of union field accesses is the only difference between "promotion in `const`/`static` bodies" and "explicit promotion". So if we can remove this, we have finally achieved what I thought to already be the case -- that the bodies of `const`/`static` initializers behave the same as explicit promotion contexts.
The reason we do not want to promote union field accesses is that they can introduce UB, i.e., they can go wrong. We want to [minimize the ways promoteds can fail to evaluate](https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/53). Also this change makes things more consistent overall, removing a special case that was added without much consideration (as far as I can tell).
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
