Remove `#[rustc_deprecated]`
This removes `#[rustc_deprecated]` and introduces diagnostics to help users to the right direction (that being `#[deprecated]`). All uses of `#[rustc_deprecated]` have been converted. CI is expected to fail initially; this requires #95958, which includes converting `stdarch`.
I plan on following up in a short while (maybe a bootstrap cycle?) removing the diagnostics, as they're only intended to be short-term.
This used to take upwards of 5 seconds for me locally. I found that the culprit was copying the downloaded LLVM shared object:
```
[22:28:03] Install "/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ci-llvm/lib/libLLVM-14-rust-1.62.0-nightly.so" to "/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libLLVM-14-rust-1.62.0-nightly.so"
[22:28:09] c Sysroot { compiler: Compiler { stage: 1, host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) } }
```
It turned out that `install()` used full copies unconditionally. Change it to try using a hard-link before falling back to copying.
Support tool lints with the `#[expect]` attribute (RFC 2383)
This PR fixes the ICE https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94953 by making the assert for converted expectation IDs conditional.
Additionally, it moves the lint expectation check into a separate query to support rustdoc and other tools. On the way, I've also added some tests to ensure that the attribute works for Clippy and rustdoc lints.
The number of changes comes from the long test file. This may look like a monster PR, this may smell like a monster PR and this may be a monster PR, but it's a harmless monster. 🦕
---
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94953
cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
Switch sources are used by backward analysis with a custom switch int
edge effects, but are otherwise unnecessarily computed.
Delay the computation until we know that switch sources are indeed
required and avoid the computation otherwise.
Further elaborate the lack of guarantees from `Hasher`
I realized that I got too excited in #94598 by adding new methods, and forgot to do the documentation to really answer the core question in #94026.
This PR just has that doc update.
r? `@Amanieu`
Add more diagnostic items
This just adds a handful diagnostic items I noticed were missing.
Would it be worth doing this for all of the remaining types? I'm willing to do it if it'd be helpful.
Track if a where bound comes from a impl Trait desugar
With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93803 `impl Trait` function arguments get desugared to hidden where bounds. However, Clippy needs to know if a bound was originally a `impl Trait` or an actual bound. This adds a field to the `WhereBoundPredicate` struct to keep track of this information during AST->HIR lowering.
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@estebank` (as the reviewer of #93803)
Improve error for missing cmake
This PR updates the error message for a missing `cmake` to be more in line with the error message for a missing installation of `ninja`.
The original issue, (#90679), suggests that both `ninja` and `cmake` are only needed for building LLVM, so I have included the suggestion from `ninja` to set `download-ci-llvm = true` if the user would rather download LLVM. If `cmake` actually is used in other areas, I can remove that part of the message.
Fixes: #90679
Create clippy lint against unexpectedly late drop for temporaries in match scrutinee expressions
A new clippy lint for issue 93883 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93883). Relies on a new trait in `marker` (called `SignificantDrop` to enable linting), which is why this PR is for the rust-lang repo and not the clippy repo.
changelog: new lint [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #96336 (Link to correct `as_mut` in docs for `pointer::as_ref`)
- #96586 (Add aliases for std::fs::canonicalize)
- #96667 (Add regression test)
- #96671 (Remove hard links from `env::current_exe` security example)
- #96726 (Add regression and bug tests)
- #96756 (Enable compiler-docs by default for `compiler`, `codegen`, and `tools` profiles)
- #96757 (Don't constantly rebuild clippy on `x test src/tools/clippy`.)
- #96769 (Remove `adx_target_feature` feature from active features list)
- #96777 (Make the test `check-pass` not to produce a JSON file)
- #96822 (Enforce quote rule for JS source code)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make the test `check-pass` not to produce a JSON file
`run-pass` produces a JSON file when enabling save analysis.
The original ICE happened on `cargo check`, moreover **without** the `generic_const_exprs` feature, so `check-pass` should be enough.
Don't constantly rebuild clippy on `x test src/tools/clippy`.
This happened because the `SYSROOT` variable was set for `x test`, but not `x build`.
Set it consistently for both to avoid unnecessary rebuilds.
This is a very small step towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76495.
Enable compiler-docs by default for `compiler`, `codegen`, and `tools` profiles
I had this overridden locally for a while and realized just now it should probably just be a default.
Remove hard links from `env::current_exe` security example
The security example shows that `env::current_exe` will return the path used when the program was started. This is not really surprising considering how hard links work: after `ln foo bar`, the two files are _equivalent_. It is _not_ the case that `bar` is a “link” to `foo`, nor is `foo` a link to `bar`. They are simply two names for the same underlying data.
The security vulnerability linked to seems to be different: there an attacker would start a SUID binary from a directory under the control of the attacker. The binary would respawn itself by executing the program found at `/proc/self/exe` (which the attacker can control). This is a real problem. In my opinion, the example given here doesn’t really show the same problem, it just shows a misunderstanding of what hard links are.
I looked through the history a bit and found that the example was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33526. That PR actually has two commits, and the first (8478d48dad) explains the race condition at the root of the linked security vulnerability. The second commit proceeds to replace the explanation with the example we have today.
This commit reverts most of the second commit from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33526.
