This makes code more readale and concise,
moving all format arguments like `format!("{}", foo)`
into the more compact `format!("{foo}")` form.
The change was automatically created with, so there are far less change
of an accidental typo.
```
cargo clippy --fix -- -A clippy::all -W clippy::uninlined_format_args
```
feat: Add an option to hide adjustment hints outside of `unsafe` blocks and functions
As the title suggests: this PR adds an option (namely `rust-analyzer.inlayHints.expressionAdjustmentHints.hideOutsideUnsafe`) that allows to hide adjustment hints outside of `unsafe` blocks and functions:
Requested by `@BoxyUwU` <3
11445: Upstream inlay hints r=lnicola a=lnicola
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/2797
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3394 (since now resolve the hints for the range given only, not for the whole document. We don't actually resolve anything due to [hard requirement](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/11445#issuecomment-1035227434) on label being immutable. Any further heavy actions could go to the `resolve` method that's now available via the official Code API for hints)
Based on `@SomeoneToIgnore's` branch, with a couple of updates:
- I squashed, more or less successfully, the commits on that branch
- downloading the `.d.ts` no longer works, but you can get it manually from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/vscode/release/1.64/src/vscode-dts/vscode.proposed.inlayHints.d.ts
- you might need to pass `--enable-proposed-api matklad.rust-analyzer`
- if I'm reading the definition right, `InlayHintKind` needs to be serialized as a number, not string
- this doesn't work anyway -- the client-side gets the hints, but they don't display
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
10423: Internal: refactor for mdbook plugin r=Veykril a=HKalbasi
This PR is for upstreaming changes that I made for mdbook plugin. Changes are adding inlay hints to `StaticIndex` and changing some functions for working around privacy of crates.
Aside this, is it okay if I bring the plugin in tree? It is a simple binary crate. I feel it will better maintained here and become resistant to api changes.
Co-authored-by: hamidreza kalbasi <hamidrezakalbasi@protonmail.com>
This renames `descend_into_macros` to `descend_into_macros_single` and `descend_into_macros_many` into `descend_into_macros`.
However, this does not touch a function in `SemanticsImpl` of same name.
